The Impact of the Depth of Embryo Replacement into the Uterine Cavity under Transabdominal Ultrasound Guidance on In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Outcome

Authors

  • Mitko Ivanovski Clinical Hospital Acibadem Sistina, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Skupi 5A, Skopje 1000
  • Slavjanka Popovska PZU "S. Popovska", Skopje 1000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2013.008

Keywords:

depth of embryo replacement, endometrium, ultrasound, in vitro fertilization, pregnancy rate.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to determine the importance of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity (upper or lower half endometrial cavity) on the implantation clinical pregnancy rates.

Material and Methods: In this prospective observational were included 160 patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation followed by IVF/ICSI and embryo transfer. On the day of embryo transfer under direct transabdominal ultrasound guidance, the transfer catheter was advanced to a defined distance from the uterine fundus, up to the point estimated for transfer: 10 ± 2.5 mm (Group A) and 15 ± 2.5 mm (Group B).

Results: In total, 160 patients, aged 24-42 years were included in the study. Overall clinical pregnancy rate were 41.2%. Analysis of our results demonstrated that pregnancy rate is significantly influenced by transfer distance from the fundus where the  pregnancy rate decreases from 48.7% in group B to 34.5%  in group A (p<0.05). There was not significantly difference in abortion rate between the two groups.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our results suggest that depth of embryo replacement inside the uterine cavity may influence the pregnancy rates and should be considered as an important factor to improve the success of IVF cycles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Edwards, R.G. Clinical approaches to increasing uterine receptivity during human implantation. Hum. Reprod., 1995; 10 (Suppl. 2): 60–66.

Goudas, V.T., Hammitt, D.G., Damario, M.A., Session, D.R., Singh, A.P. and Dumesic, D.A. Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril.1998; 70, 878–882.

Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J and Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer—can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contractions? Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 1540–1546.

Lesny P, Killick SR, Robinson J, Raven G, Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer and junctional zone contractions: is it safe to use a tenaculum? Hum Reprod. 1999; 14:2367– 2370.

Schoolcraft WB, Surrey ES and Gardner DK. Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76: 863–870.

Mansour RT and Aboulghar MA. Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1149–1153.

Buckett WM. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80:1037–1041.

Levi Setti PE, Albani E, Cavagna M, Bulletti C, Colombo GV and Negri L. The impact of embryo transfer on implantation—a review. Placenta 24 (Suppl B). 2003: 20–26.

Mirkin S, Jones EL, Mayer JF, Stadtmauer L, Gibbons WE and Oehninger S. Impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on performance and outcome of transcervical uterine embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003; 20: 318–322.

Sallam HN and Sadek SS. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80: 1042–1046.

Strickler RC, Christianson C, Crane JP, Curato A, Knight AB and Yang V. Ultrasound guidance for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1985; 43: 54–61.

Woolcott R, Stanger J. Potentially important variables identified by transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 963–6.

Hurley VA, Osborn JC, Leoni MA, Leeton J. Ultrasound guided embryo transfer: a controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 1991; 55:559–62.

Al-Shawaf T, Dave R, Harper J. Transfer of embryos into the uterus, how much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates? J Assiss Reprod Genet; 1993; 10:31–6.

Kan AK, Abdalla HI, Gafar AH. Embryo transfer: ultrasound guided versus clinical touch. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14:1259–61.

Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A. The echoguide embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results. Acta Eur Fertil. 1995; 26:113–5.

Coroleu B, Carreras O, Veiga A, Martell A, Martinez F, Belil I, Hereter L and Barri PN. Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 616–620.

Wood EG, Batzer F, Go KJ, Gutmann J, Corson SL. Ultrasound guided soft catheter embryo transfer will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod.2000; 15:107–12.

Tang OS, Ng EH, So WW. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2001;11:2310–5.

Kovasc GT. What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization? Human Reprod. 1999;14: 590– 92

Salha OH, Lamb VK, Balen AH. Apostal survey of embryo transfer practice in UK. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:686–90.

Leeton J, Trounson A, Jessup D,Wood C. The technique of human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1982; 38:156–61.

Kojima K, Nomiyama M, Kumamoto T, Matsumoto Y, Iwasaka T . Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy and implantation rates after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2001;16: 2578–82.

Naaktgeboren N, Broers FC, Heijnsbroek I. Hard to believe, hardly discussed, nevertheless very important for the IVF/ICSI results: embryo transfer technique can double or halve the pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12:149.

Nazari A, Askari HA, Check JH and O, Shaughnessy A. Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancy in in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1993; 60: 919–921.

Pacchiarotti A, Mohamed AM, Micara G, Tranquilli D, Linari A, Aspinola S, Cesare A. The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007; 24: 189-193

Roselund B, Sjoblom P, Hillensjo T. Pregnancy outcome related to the site of embryo deposition in the uterus. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996; 12:511–3.

Waterstone J, Curson R, Parsons J. Embryo transfer to low uterine cavity.Lancet. 1991;337:1413.

Veeck L. The morphological assessment of human oocytes and early concepti. In: Keel BA, Webster BW, eds. Handbook of the laboratory diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1990:353-69.

Veeck L. The morphological assessment of human oocytes and early concepti. In: Keel BA, Webster BW, eds. Handbook of the laboratory diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1990:353-69.

Steptoe, P.C. and Edwards, R. Reimplantation of a human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancy. Lancet. 1976; 1: 880 -882.

Naaktgeboren, N., Dieben, S., Heijnsbroek, I., Verburg, H. and Van der Westerlaken, L. Embryo transfer, easier said than done. Abstracts of the 16th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility and 54th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA, S352. 1998

Leong M, Leung C, Tucker M, Wong C and Chan H. Ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer. J in Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer. 1986; 3: 383–385.

Coroleu B, Barri PN, Carreras O, Martinez F, Parriego M, Hereter L, Parera N, Veiga A and Balasch J. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17:341–346.

Ivanovski M. Comparison of ultrasound guided embryo transfer and previous failed blind embryo transfer in IVF cycles. XVIII FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Book of abstracts. 2006: 160.

Matorras R, Urquijo E, Mendoza R, Corcostegui B, Exposito A and Rodriguez-Escudero FJ. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17:1762–1766.

Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Prapa S and Vlassis G. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 1904–1908.

Sallam HN, Agameya AF, Rahman AF, Ezzeldin F and Sallam AN. Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1767–1772.

Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Martinez-Salazar J, Landazabal A, Requena A, Remohi J and Simon C. Transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not increase pregnancy rates in oocyte recipients. Fertil Steril. 2002; 78,534–539.

Krampl E, Zegermacher G, Eichler C, Obruca A, Strohmer H and Feichtinger W. Air in the uterine cavity after embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1995; 63: 366–370.

Meldrum DR, Chetkowski R, Steingold KA, de Ziegler D, Cedars MI and Hamilton M. Evolution of a highly successful in vitro fertilization embryo transfer program.Fertil Steril. 1987; 64: 382–389.

Frankfurter D, Silva CP, Mota F, Trimarchi JB and Keefe D. The transfer point is a novel measure of embryo placement. Fertil Steril . 2003; 79, 1416–1421

Lesny P, Killick SR, Robinson J, Titterington J, Maguiness SD. Case report: ectopic pregnancy after transmyometrial embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1999; 72:357 –359.

Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J and Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer and uterine junctional zone contractions. Hum Reprod Update. 1999; 5: 87–88.

Van de Pas MMC, Weima S, Looman CWN and Broekmans FJM. The use of fixed distance embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI equalizes the success rates among physicians. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 774–780.

Pope CS, Cook EKD, Arny M, Novak A and Grow DR (2004) Influence of embryo transfer depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81: 51–58.

Franco JG Jr, Martins AM, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Felipe V, Contart P,Pontes A, Oliveira JB. Best site for embryo transfer: the upper or lower half of endometrial cavity? Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1785-1790.

Oliveira JB, Martins AM, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Felipe V, Contart P, Pontes A and Franco Junior JG. Increased implantation and pregnancy rates obtained by placing the tip of the transfer catheter in the central area of the endometrial cavity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004; 9: 435–441.

Gergely RZ, DeUgarte CM, Danzer H, Surrey M, Hill D, DeCherney AH. Three dimensional/four dimensional ultrasoundguided embryo transfer using the maximal implantation potential point. Fertility and Sterility. 2005;84: 500-503.

Fanchin, R., Righini, C., Olivennes, F., Taylor, S., Ziegler de, D. and Frydman, R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after inâ€vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 1998; 13: 1986–1974.

Poindexter AN, Thompson DJ, Gibbons WE, Findley WE, Dodson MG, Young RL. Residual embryos in failed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1986; 46: 262– 267.

Schulman JD. Delayed expulsion of transfer fluid after IVF/ET. Lancet. 1986; 1:44.

Azem F, Yaron Y, Botchan A. Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization –embryo transfer (IVF/ET): the possible role of the ET technique. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993; 10:302– 304.

Zouves C, Erenus M, Gomel V. Tubal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a role for proximal occlusion or salpingectomy after failed distal tubal surgery. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56: 691–695.

Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Amin YM. Dummy embryo transfer using methylene blue. Hum Reprod. 1994; 9: 1257–1259.

Knutzen V, Stratton CJ, Sher G, McNamee PI, Huang TT, Soto- Albors C . Mock embryo transfer in early luteal phase, the cycle before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer a descriptive study. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57:156– 162.

Biervliet FP, Lesny P, Maguiness SD, Robinson J, Killick SR. Transmyometrial embryo transfer and junctional zone contractions. Hum Reprod; 2002; 17:347– 350.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-15

How to Cite

1.
Ivanovski M, Popovska S. The Impact of the Depth of Embryo Replacement into the Uterine Cavity under Transabdominal Ultrasound Guidance on In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Outcome. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2013 Dec. 15 [cited 2021 Apr. 16];1(1):38-44. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2013.008

Issue

Section

B - Clinical Sciences