Comparison of Results from Inpatient and Outpatient Treatment of Tuberculosis in Republic of Macedonia

Authors

  • Ljiljana Simonovska Institute for Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje
  • Biljana Ilievska-Popovska Institute for Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2015.050

Keywords:

, tuberculosis, outcome, sputum conversion, cured, died, Republic of Macedonia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The successful treatment of patients with active tuberculosis is one of the priorities in the Tuberculosis Control Programs.

AIM: The aim was to establish whether there was a statistically significant difference in the treatment outcome in patients with tuberculosis who began their initial treatment phase and/or pursued it as inpatient, as opposed to patients with tuberculosis who underwent their entire treatment regime as outpatient. Moreover, our goal was to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference in the outcome from the treatment between patients with tuberculosis who were hospitalized up to one month, two months, or more than two months.

MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study includes 355 patients, divided into two groups. The first group, which consists of 219 patients, began their initial treatment phase as inpatient, and then they continued the treatment as outpatient. The second group, 136 patients, underwent their entire treatment as outpatient. The treatment outcome is determined with every patient (cured, treatment completed, treatment default, treatment failed, died, treatment in progress). For the statistical data analysis and for establishing the significance of the findings regarding the differences between the two groups we used the Pearson Chi-Square Test and the Yates Corrected Test.

RESULTS: The statistical analysis with the Pearson Chi-Square Test showed that the treatment outcome does not significantly depend on the model of treatment (p = 0.31). The statistical data analysis showed that there is no statistically significant difference in the achievement of conversion of the bacterial result of the sputum at the end of the initial phase of treatment regarding the studied groups (p = 0.89). The statistical data analysis showed that the length of inpatient treatment affects the outcome of the treatment and that the difference is statistically highly significant (p < 0.00005).

CONCLUSION: There are no statistically significant differences in the sputum conversion and the treatment outcome among inpatient/outpatient with tuberculosis or outpatient only; however, the length of inpatient treatment is statistically significant regarding its effect on the treatment outcome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Taylor Z, Marks SM, Rios Burrows NM, Weis SE, Stricof RL, Miller B. Causes and costs of hospitalization of tuberculosis patients in the United States. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000;4 (10):931-939.

Nardell E, Dharmadhikari A. Turning off the spigot: Reducing drug-resistant tuberculosis transmission in resource-limited settings. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;1c(10):1233-1243.

Addington WW, Albert RK, Bass JB,Jr, Catlin BJ, Loudon RG, Seggerson J, et al. Non-drug issues related to the treatment of tuberculosis. Chest. 1985;87(2 Suppl):125S-127S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.87.2_Supplement.125S

World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002. An Expanded DOTS Framework for Effective Tuberculosis Control. WHO/CDS/TB/2002.297.

Kaplan Robert.S. and Porter Michael E. How to solve the cost crisis in health care, Harvard business review, September 2011.

Wobeser W. Yuan L. Outcome of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment in the tertiary care settings-Toronto 1992/93, CMAJ. 1999: 160(6):789-94.

Caminero JA. IUATLD, 2003.

Bassili A, Fitzpatrick C, Qadeer E, Fatima R, Floyd K, Jaramillo E. A systematic review of the effectiveness of hospital-and ambulatory-based management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89(2):271-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.13-0004

Perrechi MC, Ribeiro SA. Outcomes of tuberculosis treatment among inpatients and outpatients in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2011;37(6):783-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132011000600012

Published

2015-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Simonovska L, Ilievska-Popovska B. Comparison of Results from Inpatient and Outpatient Treatment of Tuberculosis in Republic of Macedonia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2015 Apr. 30 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];3(2):337-40. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2015.050

Issue

Section

E - Public Health