A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.116Keywords:
dual cure resin, glass Ionomer, orthodontic band, band cementation, solubilityAbstract
AIM: To test the solubility of dual cure resin modified resin cement in a food simulating solution and the shear bond strength compared to conventional Glass ionomer cement.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: The materials tested were self-adhesive dual cure resin modified cement and Glass Ionomer (GIC). Twenty Teflon moulds were divided into two groups of tens. The first group was injected and packed with the modified resin cement, the second group was packed with GIC. To test the solubility, each mould was weighed before and after being placed in an analytical reagent for 30 days. The solubility was measured as the difference between the initial and final drying mass. To measure the Shear bond strength, 20 freshly extracted wisdom teeth were equally divided into two groups and embedded in self-cure acrylic resin. Four mm sections of stainless steel bands were cemented to the exposed buccal surfaces of teeth under a constant load of 500 g. Shear bond strength was measured using a computer controlled materials testing machine and the load required to deband the samples was recorded in Newtons.
RESULTS: GIC showed significantly higher mean weight loss and an insignificant lower Shear bond strength, compared to dual cure resin Cement.
CONCLUSION: It was found that dual cure resin modified cement was less soluble than glass ionomer cement and of comparable bond strength rendering it more useful clinically for orthodontic band cementation.Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Ramazanzadeh B A, Merati M, Shafaee H, Dogon L, Sohrabi K. In vitro evaluation of an experimental method for bonding of orthodontic brackets with self-adhesive resin cements. European J Gen Dent. 2013; 2 (3): 264-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.116018 PMid:24163808 PMCid:PMC3806483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.116018
Hattar S, Hatamleh M M, Sawair F, Al-Rabab'ahl M. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to tooth structure. The Saudi Dental Journal. (2015) in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.006 PMid:26082572 PMCid:PMC4459118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.006
Türker S A, Uzunoğlu E, Yılmaz Z. Effects of dentin moisture on the push-out bond strength of a fiber post luted with different self-adhesive resin cements. Restorative dentistry and endodontic. 2013; 38(4) 234-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.4.234
Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Kinuta S, Nishida H, Miyamae M, Yatani H. Mechanical properties of new self-adhesive resin-based cement. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2010; 54: 59–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2009.09.004 PMid:19879828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2009.09.004
Millet DT, Kamahli K, McColl J. Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs. conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation. Angle Orthod. 1998;68(4):345-350.
Ghanim A. Water sorption and solubility of different commercially available dental cements. (An in vitro study). Babylon medical journal. 2010; 7(4).
Manish A, Timothy FF, Douglas R. A Comparison of Shear-Peel Band Strengths of 5 Orthodontic Cements. The Angle Orthodontist. 2000; 70(4): 308-316.
Yap AUJ, Tan DTT, Goh BKC, Kuah HG, Goh M. Effect of food simulating liquids on the flexure strength of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. J Oper Dent. 2000;25: 202-208.
Abdelrahman AM, Amin AM, Sharawy AM. Effect of food simulating liquids on fracture toughness of nano-hybrid composite with different resin matrix formulations. Cairo: Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, 2012. [Dissertation]
Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, Mario F, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu CK, de Oliveira Carrilho MR. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dental Materials. 2006;22(10):973-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020 PMid:16405987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020
Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M, Ortiz AJ, Canteras M. A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Cement and Two Orthodontic Resin Adhesive Systems. Angle Orthod. 2004;75:109–113.
De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2004;20:963–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002 PMid:15501325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2007;23:71–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002 PMid:16426673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002
Keyf F, Tuna S H, Sen M, Safrany A. Water Sorption and Solubility of Different Luting and Restorative Dental Cements. Turk J Med Sci. 2007; 37 (1): 47-55.e
Al-Shekhli A Abdul Wahab R. Solubility of four dental luting cements. J Int Dent Med Res. 2010;3: (3), pp. 104-107.
Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 1999; 15: 71- 79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00016-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00016-0
Toledanoa M, Osorioa R, Osorioa E, Fuentessa V, Pratib C, Garcıa-Godoyc F. Sorption and solubility of resin based restorative dental materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2003;31:43–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00083-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00083-0
Wison AD. Specification test for the solubility and disintegration of dental cements: a critical evaluation of its meaning. J Dent Res. 1976;55(5):721-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345760550050401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345760550050401
Macorra JC, Praides G. Conventional and adhesive luting cements. Clin Oral Invest. 2002; 6: 198-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0184-1 PMid:12483233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0184-1
Al-Wahab ZN. An evaluation of the effect of different solutions on the microhardness of aesthetic restoration. MDJ. 2011;8(2).
Chieffi N, Chersoni S, Papacchini F, Vano M, Goracci C, Davidson C L, Tay F R, Ferrari M. The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. Dent Mater. 2007;23, 159–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.006 PMid:16494935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.006
Duarte Jr S, Botta AC, Meire M, Sadan A. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100, 203–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60179-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60179-1
El-Guindy J, Selim M, El-Agroudi M. Alternative pretreatment modalities with a self-adhesive system to promote dentin/alloy shear bond strength. J Prosthodont. 2010;19, 205–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00541.x PMid:20040029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00541.x
Al-Saleh M, El-Mowafy O. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets with new self-adhesive resin cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:528-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.027 PMid:20362914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.027
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
