Effect of Luting Cements On the Bond Strength to Turkom-Cera All-Ceramic Material

Authors

  • Bandar M. A. Al–Makramani College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan
  • Abdul A. A. Razak Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, Kuala Lumpur
  • Mohamed I. Abu–Hassan Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam
  • Fuad A. Al–Sanabani College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Prosthetic Dental Sciences, Jazan
  • Fahad M. Albakri Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Advanced Education General Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Riyadh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.111

Keywords:

Shear bond strength, Luting cement, All – ceramic, Adhesion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The selection of the appropriate luting cement is a key factor for achieving a strong bond between prepared teeth and dental restorations.

AIM: To evaluate the shear bond strength of Zinc phosphate cement Elite, glass ionomer cement Fuji I, resin-modified glass ionomer cement Fuji Plus and resin luting cement Panavia-F to Turkom-Cera all-ceramic material.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Turkom-Cera was used to form discs 10mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness (n = 40). The ceramic discs were wet ground, air - particle abraded with 50 - μm aluminium oxide particles and randomly divided into four groups (n = 10). The luting cement was bonded to Turkom-Cera discs as per manufacturer instructions. The shear bond strengths were determined using the universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were analysed using the tests One Way ANOVA, the nonparametric Kruskal - Wallis test and Mann - Whitney Post hoc test.

RESULTS: The shear bond strength of the Elite, Fuji I, Fuji Plus and Panavia F groups were: 0.92 ± 0.42, 2.04 ± 0.78, 4.37 ± 1.18, and 16.42 ± 3.38 MPa, respectively. There was the statistically significant difference between the four luting cement tested (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: the phosphate-containing resin cement Panavia-F exhibited shear bond strength value significantly higher than all materials tested.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Lad PP, Kamath M, Tarale K, Kusugal PB. Practical clinical considerations of luting cement: A review. Journal of International Oral Health. 2014; 6:116-20. PMid:24653615 PMCid:PMC3959149

Zareen SA, Usman JAM, Haribabu R. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of ThreeDifferent Luting Cements toward Ceramic and Dentin for AllCeramic Restorations: An in vitro Study. J Orofac Res. 2013; 3:86-9.

Bakshi Y, Ahuja N. Luting agents used in dentistry: A review of literature. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res. 2016; 4:46-50.

Hill EE. Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51:643-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.002 PMid:17586148

Awliya W, Oden A, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME. Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998; 56: 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163598422992 PMid:9537728

Blatz MB, Vonderheide M, Conejo J. The Effect of Resin Bonding on Long-Term Success of High-Strength Ceramics. J Dent Res. 2018; 97:132-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517729134 PMid:28876966

Özcan M. Evaluation of alternative intraoral repair techniques for fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30: 194-203. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01037.x PMid:12535148

Al-Makramani BMA, Razak AAA, Abu-Hassan MI. Evaluation of load at fracture of Procera AllCeram copings using different luting cements. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17:120-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00270.x PMid:18047490

Al-Makramani BM, Razak AA, Abu-Hassan MI. Comparison of the Load at Fracture of Turkomâ€Cera to Procera AllCeram and Inâ€Ceram Allâ€Ceramic Restorations. J Prosthodont. 2009; 18:484-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00467.x PMid:19694015

Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations: recommendations for success. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142(Suppl 2):20S-4S. PMid:21454837

Odén A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 450-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70010-1

Odman P, Andersson B. Procera Allceram crowns followed for 5 to 10.5 years: a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 504-9. PMid:12066695

Malament KA, Socransky SS. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years: Part I. Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70231-3

Burke FJT, Fleming GJ, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent. 2002; 4: 7-22. PMid:12071631

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50 PMid:12644802

Al-Makramani BM, Razak AA, Abu-Hassan MI. Effect of luting cements on the compressive strength of Turkom-Cera all-ceramic copings. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008; 9:33-40. PMid:18264523

Razak AAA, Abu-Hassan MI, AL-Makramani BMA, AL-Sanabani FA, AL-Shami IZ, Almansour HM. Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength to Turkom-Cera All-Ceramic Material. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17:920-25. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1954 PMid:27965501

International Standards Organization. ISO standard. 11405:2003. Dental materials – testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva: ISO/TS, 2003.

Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 265-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027 PMid:15343162

Mitchell CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast fullcoverage crowns. Dent Mater. 2000; 16: 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00009-9

Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int. 1996; 27: 203-9. PMid:9063235

Özcan M, Alkumru HN, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14:335-9. PMid:11508088

Begazo CC, de Boer HD, Kleverlaan CJ, van Waas MA, Feilzer AJ. Shear bond strength of different types of luting cements to an aluminum oxide-reinforced glass ceramic core material. Dent Mater. 2004; 20:901-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.011 PMid:15501317

Sengun A, Ozer F, Unlu N, Ozturk B. Shear bond strengths of tooth fragments reattached or restored. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30:82-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00978.x PMid:12485389

Thurmond J, Barkmeier W, Wildweding M. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72:355-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3

Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer HC. Long-term bond between dualpolymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 211-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.012 PMid:16494937

Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements: marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 347-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00093-2

Uno S, Tanaka T, Kawamoto C, Konishi J, Sano H. Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin and Cavity Adaptation of Cerec 2 Inlay Restoration. Am J Dent. 2000; 13:59-63. PMid:11764827

Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of five different all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11:602-9. PMid:10023224

Øilo G. Adhesive bonding of dental luting cements; influence of surface treatment. Acta Odontol Scand. 1978; 36:263-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357809029076 PMid:362798

Richardson DW, Tao L, Pashley DH. Bond strengths of luting cements to potassium oxalate-treated dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63:418-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90230-A

Prestipino V, Ingber A, Kravitz J. Clinical and laboratory considerations in the use of a new All-Ceramic restorative system. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998; 10:567-75. PMid:9728137

Ayyildiz S, Emir F, Pak Tunc E, Sen D. Shear bond strength of various luting cements to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. Appl Adhes Sci. 2015; 3:128–37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40563-015-0039-z

Published

2018-03-09

How to Cite

1.
Al–Makramani BMA, Razak AAA, Abu–Hassan MI, Al–Sanabani FA, Albakri FM. Effect of Luting Cements On the Bond Strength to Turkom-Cera All-Ceramic Material. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018 Mar. 9 [cited 2024 Apr. 18];6(3):548-53. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2018.111

Issue

Section

D - Dental Sciences