Recent Advances in Material and Geometrical Modelling in Dental Applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.254Keywords:
dental materials, geometric modelling, metallic alloys, composites, ceramics and nanomaterialsAbstract
This article touched, in brief, the recent advances in dental materials and geometric modelling in dental applications. Most common categories of dental materials as metallic alloys, composites, ceramics and nanomaterials were briefly demonstrated. Nanotechnology improved the quality of dental biomaterials. This new technology improves many existing materials properties, also, to introduce new materials with superior properties that covered a wide range of applications in dentistry. Geometric modelling was discussed as a concept and examples within this article. The geometric modelling with engineering Computer-Aided-Design (CAD) system(s) is highly satisfactory for further analysis or Computer-Aided-Manufacturing (CAM) processes. The geometric modelling extracted from Computed-Tomography (CT) images (or its similar techniques) for the sake of CAM also reached a sufficient level of accuracy, while, obtaining efficient solid modelling without huge efforts on body surfaces, faces, and gaps healing is still doubtable. This article is merely a compilation of knowledge learned from lectures, workshops, books, and journal articles, articles from the internet, dental forum, and scientific groups' discussions.Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials, Ninth Edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, UK. 2008.
El-Anwar MI, El-Zawahry MM, El-Mofty MS. Load transfer on dental implants and surrounding bones. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2012; 6(3): 551-60.
Zaazou M, El-Anwar M, El-Zawahry M, Abou Elnaga M. The effect of post materials on stress distribution on endodontically treated lower first premolar: finite element analysis study. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2012; 6(12): 492-498.
El-Anwar MI, Mandorah AO, Yousief SA, Soliman TA, Abd El-Wahab TM. A Finite Element Study on: Mechanical Behavior of Reciprocating Dental Files. Braz J Oral Sci. 2015; 14(1):52-59. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a11
AbdelAzim A, Zaki A, El-Anwar M. Single molar restoration: wide implant versus two conventional. Implant Tribune, Dental Tribune United Kingdom Edition. 2014; 4(1): 12-14.
El-Anwar MI, Tamam RA, Fawzy UM, Yousief SA. The effect of luting cement type and thickness on stress distribution in upper premolar implant restored with metal ceramic crowns. Tanta Dental Journal. 2015; 12:48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2015.01.004
Tolba ET, El-Sayed EM, Radi AM, EI-Anwar MI. Development and verification of computed tomography-based finite element model for the L5 vertebral body. Journal of Biophysics and Biomedical Sciences. 2008; 1(2): 63-68.
Wei S, Pallavi L. Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering –a review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2002; 67:85-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00116-X
Waskewicz VJ, Ostrowski GA, Parks JS. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution transmitted from a fixed prosthesis attached to osseointegrated implants. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9(4): 405-411.
Eley BM. The future of dental amalgam: A review of the literature. 2. Mercury exposure in dental practice. Br Dent J. 1997; 182: 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809370 PMid:9154707
Mclean JW. Alternatives to Amalgam Alloys: 1. Br Dent J. 1984; 157: 432–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805511 PMid:6241477
Saunders SA. Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part 1: Focus on nanocomposite restoratives and biomimetics. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2009; 1:47–61. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S7722 PMid:23674905 PMCid:PMC3652345
Wickson F. Narratives of nature and nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008; 3:313–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.140 PMid:18654532
Ozak ST, Ozkan P. Nanotechnology and dentistry. Eur J Dent. 2013; 7:145–151. PMid:23408486 PMCid:PMC3571524
Schwitalla A, Muller W.D. PEEK Dental implants: a review of the literature. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2013; 41(6):743-749. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002 PMid:21905892
Jensen S. Patent: Dental implant using a polymeric post. US 8342842 B2, 2013.
Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Matinlinna J.P, Siddiqui F, Nassani M.Z, Baroudi K. Nanomodified PEEK dental implants: bioactive composites and surface modification - a review. International journal of dentistry. 2015; 381759:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/381759 PMid:26495000 PMCid:PMC4606406
Sarot JR, Contar CMM, da Cruz ACC. Ricardo de Souza M. Evaluation of the stress distribution in cfr-peek dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2010; 21:2079-2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4084-7
Obeid AS, Alkhodary MA, Omran MH, Abdelwahab EM. The basal polymeric PEEK dental implant restoring a missing molar: a case study validated with finite element analysis. International journal of advanced dental and medical sciences. 2015; 1(2):50-56.
Nanci A. Ten Cate's Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function; Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA; London, UK, 2012. PMCid:PMC3373187
Zafar MS, Ahmed N. Nano-mechanical evaluation of dental hard tissues using indentation technique. World Appl Sci J. 2013; 28:1393–1399.
Zafar MS, Ahmed N. Nanomechanical characterization of exfoliated and retained deciduous incisors. Technol Health Care. 2014; 22:785–793. PMid:25134963
Bhavikatti SK, Bhavikatti SK, Bhardwaj S, Bhardwaj S, Prabhuji ML, Prabhuji ML. Current applications of nanotechnology in dentistry: a review. General dentistry. 2014; 62(4):72-7. PMid:24983175
Kelly JR, Rungruanganunt P, Hunter B, Vailati F. Development of a clinically validated bulk failure test for ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104:228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60129-1
Saunders EM. Hand instrumentation in root canal preparation. Endod Top. 2005; 10:163-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00127.x
Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988; 14: 346-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013; 39:163-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.005 PMid:23321225
Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000; 33:297-310. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00339.x PMid:11307203
El-Anwar MI, Yousief SA, Kataia E, Abd El-Wahab TM. Finite Element Study on Continuous Rotating Versus Reciprocating Nickel Titanium Instruments. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27(4):436-441. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600480 PMid:27652707
Abd El-Wahab TM. Thesis: Cyclic fatigue resistance and finite element analysis of continuous versus reciprocating motion of three different rotary Nickel-Titanium instruments. Mansoura University, 2015.
Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod. 2003; 29:15-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200301000-00005 PMid:12540212
Martini K, Poweil GH. Geometric modeling requirements for structural design. Engineering with Computers. 1990; 6: 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200241
Kim HJ, Seo YD, Youn SK. Isogeometric analysis for trimmed CAD surfaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2009; 198(37-40):2982-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.05.004
http://biomedical.materialise.com/mimics
Singh A, Gupta A, Yadav A, Chaturvedi TP, Bhatnagar A, Singh BP. Immediate placement of implant in fresh extraction socket with early loading. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012; 3:S219-S222. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.101099 PMid:23230368 PMCid:PMC3514938
Pirkera W, Kocherb A. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implants placed into single-rooted extraction sockets: 2-year follow-up of a clinical study. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2009; 38(11):1127-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.008 PMid:19665354
Borgonovo AE, Fabbri A, Vavassori V, Censi R, Maiorana C. Multiple teeth replacement with endosseous one-piece yttrium-stabilized zirconia dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17(6):e981-7. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18194 PMid:22926479 PMCid:PMC3505720
Pozzi A, Gargari M, Barlattani A. CAD/CAM Technologies in the surgical and prosthetic treatment of the edentulous patient with biomymetic individualized approach. Oral & Implantology - Anno I – N, 1/2008
http://www.delcam.com/solutions/dental/
http://envisiontec.com/3dent-3sp-3d-printer-for-dental-model-production/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
