3D FEA study on: Implant Threading Role on Selection of Implant and Crown Materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.331Keywords:
Dental implant, Finite Element Analysis, PEEK, PEKK, Titanium.Abstract
AIM: This study deeply investigates the effect of dental implant threading and material selection on the mandibular bone under two different crown materials (Translucent Zirconia and Porcelain fused to metal).
METHODS: Two different designs of single piece dental implants were supporting dummy crown above simplified bone geometry in two finite element models. Models components were created by general-purpose CAD/CAM engineering package and then assembled inside ANSYS before meshing and assigning materials. Compressive loading of 100 N and 45º oblique loading of 50 N were tested.
RESULTS: Twenty-four case studies were analysed, and their results were compared. Micro thread reduces implant maximum Von Mises stress by about 50 to 70% than regular thread one. Oblique loading of 50 N will produce 4 to 5 times more maximum Von Mises values on implant body than 100 N vertical loading. Zero or negligible effect on the cortical bone was recorded when exchanging the tested crown material. Although titanium implant can also reduce cortical bone, Von Mises stress by 50 to 100% in comparison to reinforced PEKK (poly ether-ketone-ketone) or PEEK (poly-ether-ether-ketone).
CONCLUSIONS: Reinforced PEKK and PEEK implants can represent a good alternative to titanium implants. Zirconia crown distributes the applied load better than Porcelain fused to a metal one. Regardless of the implant material, an implant with the micro thread has superior behaviour in comparison to a regular one. Zirconia crown above titanium implant with the micro thread may represent the best option for patient bone.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
http://es.championsimplants.com/champions/champions-implants/champions-win-peek.
Schwitalla A, Müller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39(6): 743-749. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002 PMid:21905892
Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007; 28:4845–4869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 PMid:17686513 PMCid:PMC2040108
Liao K. Performance characterization and modeling of a composite hip prosthesis. Exp Tech. 1994; 18:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.1994.tb00303.x
Maharaj GR, Jamison RD. Intraoperative impact: characterization and laboratory simulation on composite hip prostheses. In: Composite materials for implant applications in the human body: characterization and testing. ASTM International, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP15546S PMCid:PMC2002118
Kelsey DJ, Springer GS, Goodman SB. Composite implant for bone replacement. J Compos Mater. 1997; 31:1593–1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839703101603
Corvelli AA, Biermann PJ, Roberts JC. Design, analysis and fabrication of a composite segmental bone replacement implant. J Adv Mater. 1997; 28:2–8.
Hanasono MM, Goel N, DeMonte F. Calvarial reconstruction with polyetheretherketone implants. Ann Plast Surg. 2009; 62:653–655. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318184abc7 PMid:19461279
El-Anwar MI. Simple technique to build complex 3D solid models. In: Proceeding of 19th international conference on computer Theory and Applications (ICCTA 2009), 2009:17-19.
Sarot JR, Contar CM, Da Cruz AC, de Souza Magini R. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2010; 21(7):2079-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4084-7
El-Anwar MI, El-Zawahry MM, El-Mofty MS. Load transfer on dental implants and surrounding bones. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2012; 6: 551-60.
Kohnke P. ANSYS mechanical APDL theory reference. Canonsburg, PA, USA: ANSYS Inc., 2013.
El-Anwar MI, El-Mofty MS, Awad AH, El-Sheikh SA, El-Zawahry MM. The effect of using different crown and implant materials on bone stress distribution: a finite element study. Egypt J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 5:58-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OMX.0000444266.10130.4c
El-Anwar MI, El-Zawahry MM. A three dimensional finite element study on dental implant design. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 2011; 9(1):77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2011.05.007
EL-Anwar MI, EL- Zawahry MM, Nassani MZ, Ibraheem EM, ElGabry HS. New implant selection criterion based on implant design. European Journal of Dentistry. 2017; 11(3):186-181. PMid:28729790 PMCid:PMC5502562
Cicciu M, Bramanti E, Matacena G, Guglielmino E, Risitano G. FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014; 7:817–25. PMid:24955150 PMCid:PMC4057829
El-Zawahry MM, El-Anwar MI, Elragi A, Jandali R. Studying the influence of different implant designs subjected to various loading types on bone stress distribution. Egypt Med J Natl Res Cent. 2009; 8:23–7.
Ahmad M. Al-Thobity, BDS, MD Ahmad Kutkut, DDS, MS Khalid Almas, BDS, MSc. Microthreaded Implants and Crestal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2017; 43(2):157-166. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00170 PMid:27870921
Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15:15-46. PMid:10697938
Şahin S, Cehreli MC, Yalçın E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses—a review. Journal of dentistry. 2002; 30(7-8):271-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00065-9
Lan TH, Liu PH, Chou MM, Lee HE. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses in implant prostheses. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2016; 115(1):76-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.021 PMid:26412004
Güngör MB, DDS, PhD and Handan Yılmaz, DDS, PhD. Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116:346-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.022 PMid:27063944
Koch FP, Weng D, Krämer S, Biesterfeld S, Jahnâ€Eimermacher A, Wagner W. Osseointegration of oneâ€piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2010; 21(3):350-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01832.x PMid:20074240
Schwitalla A, Müller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2013; 39(6):743-9. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002 PMid:21905892
Zhao M, An M, Wang Q, Liu X, Lai W, Zhao X, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells in response to bioinert implant material titanium and polyetheretherketone. J Proteomics. 2012; 75:3560–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.03.033 PMid:22504627
Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ, Kim SK, Kwon HB, Kim MJ. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of polyâ€etherâ€etherâ€ketone dental implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2012; 100(4):1044-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32669 PMid:22331553
Sarot JR, Contar CMM, da Cruz ACC, de Souza Magini R. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010; 21:2079–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4084-7 PMid:20464460
Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2016; 60(1):12-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 PMid:26520679
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
