Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine-Induced Caudal Block in Children: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.024Keywords:
Caudal block, Children, Magnesium, DexmedetomidineAbstract
Background:
Caudal block remains fundamental in pediatric anesthetic practice. It is very useful in a wide range of surgical procedures and has proved to have a remarkable safety record, But one of the major limitations of the single-injection technique is the relatively short duration of postoperative analgesia .Prolongation of caudal analgesia using single-shot technique has been achieved by the addition of various adjuvant.
objectives:
The aim of this work is to compare magnesium and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine-induced caudal block in children undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery.
Study design: Randomized double blind trial
Settings: pediatric OR of a tertiary care center
Methods
A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial included 36 children, aged between 1 and 7 years, scheduled for lower limb orthopedic surgery. Patients received general anesthesia in addition to caudal block. Patients were divided into three groups: Dexmedetomidine group (n=12): received 0.5 mL/Kg bupivacaine + 2 mcg/Kg dexmedetomidine, Magnesium group (n=12): received 0.5 mL/Kg bupivacaine + 50 mg magnesium, and control group (n=12): received 0.5 mL/Kg bupivacaine + normal saline. Patients were compared according to: duration of analgesia, pain scores, sedation scores, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate.
Results
Both magnesium group and dexmedetomidine group showed better analgesic profile (duration of analgesia and pain scores) compared to the control group without significant difference between the two former groups. Dexmedetomidine group showed higher sedation score, lower mean arterial pressure and lower heart rate compared to other groups.
limitations: 1- It is a single center study. 2- We used single dose for each drugs. 3- We performed as single shot caudal block; thus, we could not extrapolate our findings in continuous blocks.
Conclusions
Both magnesium (50mg) and dexmedetomidine (2 mcg/Kg) improved the analgesic profile of bupivacaine-induced caudal block in children. Dexmedetomidine administration was accompanied with higher sedation score and negative hemodynamic profile.
Keywords
Caudal block, children, Magnesium, Dexmedetomidine.
BACKGROUND: Caudal block remains fundamental in pediatric anaesthetic practice. It is very useful in a wide range of surgical procedures and has proved to have a remarkable safety record, But one of the major limitations of the single-injection technique is the relatively short duration of postoperative analgesia. Prolongation of caudal analgesia using single-shot technique has been achieved by the addition of various adjuvant.
AIM: This work aims to compare magnesium and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine-induced caudal block in children undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind trial.
SETTINGS: Pediatric or of a tertiary care centre.
METHODS: A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial included 36 children, aged between 1 and 7 years, scheduled for lower limb orthopaedic surgery. Patients received general anaesthesia in addition to the caudal block. Patients were divided into three groups: Dexmedetomidine group (n = 12): received 0.5 mL/Kg bupivacaine + 2 mcg/Kg dexmedetomidine, Magnesium group (n = 12): received 0.5 mL/Kg bupivacaine + 50 mg magnesium, and control group (n = 12): received 0.5 mL/Kg bupivacaine + normal saline. Patients were compared according to the duration of analgesia, pain scores, sedation scores, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate.
RESULTS: Both magnesium group and dexmedetomidine group showed better analgesic profile (duration of analgesia and pain scores) compared to the control group without significant difference between the two former groups. Dexmedetomidine group showed higher sedation score, lower mean arterial pressure and lower heart rate compared to other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Both magnesium (50 mg) and dexmedetomidine (2 mcg/Kg) improved the analgesic profile of bupivacaine-induced caudal block in children. Dexmedetomidine administration was accompanied with higher sedation score and negative hemodynamic profile.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Ansermino M, Basu R, Vandebeek C, Montgomery C. Nonopioid additives to local anaesthetics for caudal blockade in children: a systematic review. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003; 13:561–573. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01048.x PMid:12950855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01048.x
Marhofer P, Brummett CM. Safety and efficiency of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to local anesthetics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016; 29:632–637. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000364 PMid:27258154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000364
Farag E, Argalious M, Abd-Elsayed A, Ebrahim Z, Doyle DJ. The use of dexmedetomidine in anesthesia and intensive care: a review. Curr Pharm Des. 2012; 18:6257–6265. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161212803832272 PMid:22762468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/138161212803832272
Trifa M, Tumin D, Tobias JD. Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct for caudal anesthesia and analgesia in children. Minerva anestesiologica. 2018; 84(7):836-47. PMid:29479931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12523-5
Kawakami H, Mihara T, Nakamura N, Ka K, Goto T. Effect of magnesium added to local anesthetics for caudal anesthesia on postoperative pain in pediatric surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0190354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190354 PMid:29293586 PMCid:PMC5749796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190354
Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997; 23:293–297. PMid:9220806
Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J. 1974; 2:656–659. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656 PMid:4835444 PMCid:PMC1613102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656
Fyneface-Ogan S, Mato CN, Tobin M. A comparative study between caudal bupivacaine and bupivacaine co-administered with neostigmine for postoperative analgesia in children. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2014; 21:51–56. PMid:24887252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-1936.163686
Wu H-H, Wang H-T, Jin J-J, Cui G-B, Zhou K-C, Chen Y, Chen GZ, Dong YL, Wang W . Does dexmedetomidine as a neuraxial adjuvant facilitate better anesthesia and analgesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e93114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093114 PMid:24671181 PMCid:PMC3966844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093114
Lönnqvist P-A. Alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists as adjuncts to Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Children--is there a mechanism of action and should we use them? Paediatr Anaesth. 2012; 22:421–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03821.x PMid:22486904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03821.x
Abdulatif M, Fawzy M, Nassar H, Hasanin A, Ollaek M, Mohamed H. The effects of perineural dexmedetomidine on the pharmacodynamic profile of femoral nerve block: a dose-finding randomised, controlled, double-blind study. Anaesthesia. 2016; 71:1177–1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13603 PMid:27611039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13603
Anttila M, Penttilä J, Helminen A, Vuorilehto L, Scheinin H. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after extravascular doses in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003; 56:691–693. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01944.x PMid:14616431 PMCid:PMC1884292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01944.x
Dyck JB, Maze M, Haack C, Vuorilehto L, Shafer SL. The pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects of intravenous and intramuscular dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in adult human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993; 78:813–820. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199305000-00002 PMid:8098190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199305000-00002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Hagar Hassanein Refaee, amel Amel Hanafy Abo Elela, Maha Gamil Hanna, Mai Ahmed Ali, Amira Mohamed El Khateeb
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0