Evaluation of Three Bridging Tricorticocancellous Bone Grafts in the Treatment of Old Non-uniting Fractured Humerus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.10089Keywords:
Humeral fractures, Bridging tricorticocancellous bone graft, Dynamic compression plateAbstract
Background: Nonunion of humeral shaft fracture after conservative treatments or frequent failed surgical treatment of bone healing exemplify the difficulties in managing a bone defect or severely damaged individuals. Aim of the study: The present study was undertaken to evaluate three bridging tricoticocancellous bone grafts in the treatment of old non-uniting fractured humerus. Materials and Methods: From June 2014 to December 2019, three bridging tricoticocancellous bone grafts were used to treat non-union humeral shaft fractures using dynamic compression plates at Sulaimani Teaching Hospital in Iraq. Results: Sixteen patients, 11 males, and 5 females, varying in age from 28 to 64 years old (mean age 41) were recruited for the study. Six patients had previously undergone conservative treatment, and ten patients had previously undergone surgical treatment, such as open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws or various intramedullary nails. Four out of ten patients had previously received bone transplants in conjunction with internal fixation. The nonunion lasted between 2 and 4 years (a mean of 3 years). In patients who were treated by recanalization of the medullary canal healing rate of a non-uniting fractured shaft, humerus reached 100% in all 16 patients, indicating improvements in both bone healing and functional index outcomes. The satisfaction rate score was in 15 patients (93.75%). Also, the function score was excellent in 15 patients (93.75%), while the movement score was in 14 patients (87.5%). The union rate, angular deformity, and limb shortening were used to evaluate bone results. Conclusion: When using the technique of medullary recanalization opening the bone canal, and fixation by dynamic compression plate for old non-uniting fractured shaft humerus patients, the findings confirm that three bridging tricoticocancellous bone grafts are superior in healing and union, improved arm function, and a high satisfaction rate as achieved.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Van Houwelingen A, McKee MD. Management and complications of humeral shaft fractures. Univ Toronto Med J. 2004;81(2):96-102.
Igbigbi PS, Manda K. Epidemiology of humeral fractures in Malawi. Int Orthop. 2004;28(6):338-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0596-4 PMid:15580500
Scheerlinck T, Handelberg F. Functional outcome after intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: Comparison between retrograde Marchetti-vicenzi and unreamed AO antegrade nailing. J Trauma. 2002;52(1):60-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200201000-00012 PMid:11791053
Tytherleigh-Strong G, Walls N, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(2):249-53. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b2.8113 PMid:9546454
Mills L, Tsang J, Hopper G, Keenan G, Simpson AH. The multifactorial aetiology of fracture nonunion and the importance of searching for latent infection. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(10):512-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0138 PMid:27784669
Wenisch S, Trinkaus K, Hild A, Hose D, Herde K, Heiss C, et al. Human reaming debris: A source of multipotent stem cells. Bone. 2005;36(1):74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.09.019 PMid:15664005
Moghaddam A, Ermisch C, Schmidmaier G. Non-union current treatment concept. Shafa Orthop J. 2016;3(1):e4546. https://doi.org/10.17795/soj-4546
Leiblein M, Verboket R, Marzi I, Wagner N, Nau C. Nonunions of the humerus-treatment concepts and results of the last five years. Chin J Traumatol. 2019;22(4):187-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.04.002 PMid:31109830
Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T. Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2007;31(3):391-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0200-1 PMid:16900354
Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ. Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: Intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(3):162-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200003000-00002 PMid:10791665
Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Compression plating versus hackethal nailing in closed humeral shaft fractures failing nonoperative reduction. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(3):194-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199506000-00003 PMid:7623170
Tomic S, Bumbaširevic M, Lešic A, Mitkovic M, Atkinson HD. Ilizarov frame fixation without bone graft for atrophic humeral shaft nonunion: 28 Patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(8):549-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/Bot.0b013e31814612c8 PMid:17805022
McKee MD, Miranda MA, Riemer BL, Blasier RB, Redmond BJ, Sims SH, et al. Management of humeral nonunion after the failure of locking intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(7):492-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199610000-00008 PMid:8892150
Berkes MB, Little MT, Lazaro LE, Cymerman RM, Pardee NC, Helfet DL, et al. Intramedullary allograft fibula as a reduction and fixation tool for treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures with diaphyseal extension. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(3):e56-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829a346d PMid:24561540
Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D. Fracture healing: The diamond concept. Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 4):S3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(08)70003-2 PMid:18224731
Ward EF, Savoie FH, Hughes JL. Fractures of the diaphyseal humerus. In: Skeletal Trauma: Fractures, Dislocations, and Ligamentous Injuries. Vol. 2. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1992. p. 1523-47.
Pugh DM, McKee MD. Advances in the management of humeral nonunion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(1):48-59. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200301000-00007 PMid:12699371
Seebach C, Henrich D, Meier S, Nau C, Bonig H, Marzi I. Safety and feasibility of cell-based therapy of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells in plate-stabilized proximal humeral fractures in humans. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1066-7 PMid:2786890
Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U, Heiss C, Alt V. Diaphyseal long bone nonunions-types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop. 2018;42(2):247-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3734-5 PMid:29273837
Heckman JD, McKee M, McQueen MM, Ricci W, Tornetta P 3rd. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014.
Kontakis GM, Papadokostakis GM, Alpantaki K, Chlouverakis G, Hadjipavlou AG, Giannoudis PV. Intramedullary nailing for non-union of the humeral diaphysis: A review. Injury. 2006;37(10):953-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.050 PMid:16777105
Jupiter JB. Complex non-union of the humeral diaphysis. Treatment with a medial approach, an anterior plate, and a vascularized fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(5):701-7. PMid:2355031
Padhye KP, Kulkarni VS, Kulkarni GS, Kulkarni MG, Kulkarni S, Kulkarni R, et al. Plating, nailing, external fixation, and fibular strut grafting for non-union of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013;21(3):327-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901302100313 PMid:24366794
Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(6):347-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0 PMid:22958838
Calori GM, Mazza EL, Mazzola S, Colombo A, Giardina F, Romanò F, et al. Non-unions. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017;14(2):186-8. https://doi.org/10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.186 PMid:29263731
Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, Rybak Z. Stem cells: Past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5 PMid:30808416
Henrich D, Seebach C, Sterlepper E, Tauchmann C, Marzi I, Frank J. RIA reamings and hip aspirate: A comparative evaluation of osteoprogenitor and endothelial progenitor cells. Injury. 2010;41(Suppl 2):S62-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(10)70012-7 PMid:21144931
Denies E, NijS S, Sermon A, Broos P. Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of plating and intramedullary nailing. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(6):735-42. PMid:21302570
Wali MG, Baba AN, Latoo IA, Bhat NA, Baba OK, Sharma S. Internal fixation of shaft humerus fractures by dynamic compression plate or interlocking intramedullary nail: A prospective, randomised study. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014;9(3):133-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-014-0204-0 PMid:25408496
Segonds JM, Alnot JY, Masmejean E. Aseptic non-union of humeral shaft fractures treated by plating and bone grafting. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003;89(2):107-14. PMid:12844054
Bernard de Dompsure R, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P. Uninfected nonunion of the humeral diaphysis: Review of 21 patients treated with shingling, compression plate, and autologous bone graft. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(2):139-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2010.02.003 PMid:20417912
Singh AK, Arun GR, Narsaria N, Srivastava A. Treatment of non-union of humerus diaphyseal fractures: A prospective study comparing interlocking nail and locking compression plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(7):947-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1973-0 PMid:24853958
Hierholzer C, Sama D, Toro JB, Peterson M, Helfet DL. Plate fixation of ununited humeral shaft fractures: Effect of type of bone graft on healing. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(7):1442-7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00332 PMid:16818968
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmed Alkhuzai (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0