Comparative Evaluation of Different SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Point-of-Care Antigen Tests with SARS-CoV-2 PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.10335Keywords:
SARS-CoV-2, Point of care, Rapid antigen tests, SARS-CoV-2 PCR, COVID-19Abstract
BACKGROUND: Detection of positive 2019-nCoV nucleic acids by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR)-based assays performed on the upper and lower respiratory samples remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests can offer a faster (15–30 min) and less expensive way to diagnose active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection than nucleic acid amplification tests.
AIM: Hence, the present study aimed to compare and evaluate the results of different SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests with SARS-CoV-2 PCR as a reference method.
METHODS: Sixty-five nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected from attendees of the Reference Laboratory of Egyptian university hospitals. The samples were placed in viral transport medium for RNA extraction. The remaining part of the suspension was stored at −70°C until use for COVID-19 antigen testing. All samples were processed for the COVID-19 Ag rapid test and RT-PCR simultaneously.
RESULTS: RT-PCR assay revealed 46 (70.8%) positive samples and 19 (29.2%) negative samples for COVID-19. All eight rapid antigen assays indicated specificity and positive predictive value of 100% each. As for the other parameters, the sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy ranged from 43.8 to 93.8, 33.3 to 90, and 60 to 96, respectively. Biozak exhibited the best performance with the highest sensitivities 91.3, 81.8, and 93.75, respectively, while Viro and Standard Q were the worst among the tested kits with sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy of 50, 33.3, and 60 each. Regarding the relationship between the viral load of COVID-19 detected by RT-PCR and the results of the eight rapid antigen tests (RAT), we deduced that the higher the viral load, the better the sensitivity observed.
CONCLUSION: The RATs used, in our study, exhibited heterogeneous diagnostic performance, where some of them showed very promising results in comparison to the reference RT-PCR assay.Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Payne S. Family coronaviridae. Viruses. 2017;6:149-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803109-4.00017-9 PMid:7149805
Afar Y, Fauquier N, Anwar S, Hosen MJ. SARS-CoV-2: A new dimension to our understanding of coronaviruses. Int Microbial. 2020;24(1):19-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-020-00152-y PMid:33231780
Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727-33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 PMid:31978945
Cucinotta D, Vanilla M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Act Biomed. 2020;91(1):157-60. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397 PMid:32191675
Ismail G, Mustafa M, Abdelghaffar H, Halim R, Omar N, Fahim N. Current status and a future perspective of COVID19 in Egypt: Egyptian reference laboratory experience. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2021;15(3):1257-65. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.15.3.15
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7 PMid:3200714
Plebani M, Laposata M, Lippi G. A manifesto for the future of laboratory medicine professionals. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;489:49-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.11.021 PMid:30445032
Eftekhari A, Alipour M, Chodari L, Dizaj S, Ardalan M, Samiei M, et al. A Comprehensive review of detection methods for SARSCoV-2. Microorg. 2021;9(2):232. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020232 PMid:33499379
Alpdagtas S, Ilhan E, Uysal E, Sengor M, Ustundag CB, Gunduz O. Evaluation of current diagnostic methods for COVID-19. APL Bioeng. 2020;4(4):041506. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0021554 PMid:33305162
Carter L, Garner L, Smoot J, Li Y, Zhou Q, Saveson C, et al. Assay techniques and test development for COVID-19 diagnosis. ACS Cent Sci. 2020;6(5):591-605. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00501 PMid:32382657
Liu W, Liu L, Kou G, Zheng Y, Ding Y, Ni W, et al. Evaluation of nucleocapsid and spike protein-based ELISAs for detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(6):e00461-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00461-20 PMid:32229605
Kujawski S, Wong K, Collins J, Epstein L, Killerby M, Midgley C, et al. Clinical and virologic characteristics of the first 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):861-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0877-5 PMid:32327757
Dankova Z, Novakova E, Skerenova M, Holubekova V, Lucansky V, Dvorska D, et al. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection by rapid antigen and by three commercial RT-qPCR tests: A study from Martin University hospital in Slovakia. Intern J Env R Public H. 2021;18:7037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137037 PMid:34280974
World Health Organization. (2021). Antigen-detection in the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Interim Guidance. (No. WHO/2019-nCoV/Antigen_Detection/2021.1). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345948.
Ambrosi C, Prezioso C, Checconi P, Scribano D, Sarshar M, Capannari M, et al. SARS-CoV-2: Comparative analysis of different RNA extraction methods. J Virol Methods. 2021;287:114008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114008 PMid:33160015
Sung H, Roh K, Hong K, Seong M, Ryoo N, Kim H, et al. COVID-19 molecular testing in Korea: Practical essentials and answers from experts based on experiences of emergency use authorization assays. Ann Lab Med. 2020;40:439-47. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.6.439 PMid:32539299
Hur K, Park K, Lim Y, Jeong Y, Sung H, Kim M. Evaluation of four commercial kits for SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction approved by emergency-useauthorization in Korea. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00521 PMid:32903503
Harrington A, Cox B, Snowdon J, Bakst J, Ley E, Grajales P, et al. Comparison of abbott ID-NOW and abbott m2000 Methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs from symptomatic patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(8):e00798-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00798-20 PMid:32327448
Sethuraman N, Jeremiah SS, Ryo A. Interpreting diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2249-51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.8259 PMid:32374370
Chu V, Schwartz N, Donnelly M, Chuey M, Soto R, Yousaf A, et al. Comparison of home antigen testing with RT-PCR and viral culture during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. JAMA Intern Med. 2022; 33:e221827. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1827 PMid:35486394
Peña M, Ampuero M, Garcés C, Gaggero A, García P, Velasquez M, et al. Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;107:201-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.087 PMid:33945868
Routsias J, Mavrouli M, Tsoplou P, Dioikitopoulou K, Tsakris A. Diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) for SARS-CoV-2 and their efficacy in monitoring the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients. Scien Rep. 2021;11(1):22863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02197-z PMid:34819567
Landaas E, Storm M, Tollånes M, Barlinn R, Kran A, Bragstad K, et al. Diagnostic performance of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in a large, Norwegian cohort. J Clin Virol. 2021;137:104789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104789 PMid:33736946
Basu A, Zinger T, Inglima K, Woo KM, Atie O, Yurasits L, et al. Performance of abbott ID-NOW COVID-19 rapid nucleic acid amplification test using nasopharyngeal swabs transported in viral transport media and dry nasal swabs in a New York city academic institution. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(8):e01136-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01136-20.e01136-20 PMid:32471894
Chaimayo C, Kaewnaphan B, Tanlieng N, Athipanyasilp N, Sirijatuphat R, Chayakulkeeree M, et al. Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand. Virol J. 2020;17(1):177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01452-5 PMid:33187528
Kawasuji H, Takegoshi Y, Kaneda M, Ueno A, Miyajima Y, Kawago K, et al. Transmissibility of COVID-19 depends on the viral load around onset in adult and symptomatic patients. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0243597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243597 PMid:33296437
Jegerlehner S, Suter-Riniker F, Jent P, Bittel P, Nagler M. Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in reallife clinical settings. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;109:118-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.010 PMid:34242764
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ghada Ismail, Dalia H. Abdelhamid, Rania Abdel Halim, Marwa Salah Mostafa, Hossam Abdelghaffar, Noha Alaa Eldin Fahim, Ahmed Elshafei, Menna Asker, Nashwa Naguib Omar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
