The Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and XP-Endo Finisher on Post-operative Pain after Endodontic Retreatment on Patients (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.10536Keywords:
Endodontic retreatment, Navitip, Pain, Ultra X, XP-endo finisherAbstract
AIM: To evaluate the effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation or XP-Endo Finisher on postoperative pain in patients with underextended filling in previously endodontically treated mandibular first molar teeth requiring endodontic retreatment using visual analog scale (VAS) scale at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 h, and 7 daytime intervals.
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with mandibular first molars which need endodontic retreatment were randomly allocated into one of three separate groups (n = 26); NaviTip group (control), XP-Endo Finisher group, or Ultra X group. Data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: XP-Endo Finisher agitation and ultrasonic agitation as a final irrigation protocol showed significantly lower pain values than the control group, but there was no significant difference in pain values between the experimental groups.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that agitation techniques used during endodontic retreatment decreased the incidence and intensity of post-operative pain.Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Bate AL, Ford TR. Histologic investigation of root canal-treated teeth with apical periodontitis: A retrospective study from twenty-four patients. J Endod. 2009;35(4):493-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.014 PMid:19345793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.014
Pedullà E, Abiad RS, Conte G, Khan K, Lazaridis K, Rapisarda E, et al. Retreatability of two hydraulic calcium silicate-based root canal sealers using rotary instrumentation with supplementary irrigant agitation protocols: A laboratory-based micro-computed tomographic analysis. Int Endod J. 2019;52(9):1377-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13132 PMid:31025364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13132
Saad AY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri NH. Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of Gutta-Percha during root canal retreatment. J Endod. 2007;33(1):38-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.012 PMid:17185127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.012
Khaord P, Amin A, Shah MB, Uthappa R, Raj N, Kachalia T, et al. Effectiveness of different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of mesial root canals of permanent mandibular first molar: A scanning electron microscopic study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(4):321-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.159742 PMid:26180419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.159742
ElAfify NA, Hashem AA, Kamel WH, Abdel Hafiz ES. The influence of three root canal irrigation methods on post-operative pain “Randomized Clinical Trial”. Future Dent J. 2022;7(2):79-83. https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.7021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.7021
Sarıyılmaz E, Keskin C. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using xp-endo finisher, endoactivator, passive ultrasonic irrigation or syringe irrigation. Meandros Med Dent J. 2018;19(2):127-–31. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.24008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.24008
Chubb DW. A review of the prognostic value of irrigation on root canal treatment success. Aust Endod J. 2019;45(1):5-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12348 PMid:30980478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12348
Bernardes RA, Duarte MA, Vivan RR, Alcalde MP, Vasconcelos BC, Bramante CM. Comparison of three retreatment techniques with ultrasonic activation in flattened canals using micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J. 2016;49(9):890-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12522 PMid:26280904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12522
Azim AA, Aksel H, Jefferson MM, Huang GT. Comparison of sodium hypochlorite extrusion by five irrigation systems using an artificial root socket model and a quantitative chemical method. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):1055-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2187-y PMid:28748298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2187-y
Yılmaz K, Tüfenkçi P, Adıgüzel M. The effects of QMix and EndoActivator on postoperative pain in mandibular molars with nonvital pulps: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(11):4173-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02856-6 PMid:30815731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02856-6
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146 PMid:17695343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Elnaghy AM, Mandorah A, Elsaka SE. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: A comparative study. Odontology. 2017;105(2):178-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0251-8 PMid:27206916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0251-8
Berman LH, Hargreaves KM. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2020.
Anjaneyulu K, Nivedhitha MS. Influence of calcium hydroxide on the post-treatment pain in Endodontics: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(3):200-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131775 PMid:24944439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131775
Sipavičiūtė E, Manelienė R. Pain and flare-up after endodontic treatment procedures. Stomatologija. 2014;16(1):25-30. PMid:24824057
Garg N, Garg A. Textbook of Endodontics. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/10910
Visconti RP, Tortamano IP, Buscariolo IA. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of mepivacaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2016;42(9):1314-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.015 PMid:27475099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.015
Hepsenoglu YE, Eyuboglu TF, Özcan M. Postoperative pain intensity after single- versus two-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment: A randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2018;44(9):1339-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.05.017 PMid:30054099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.05.017
Comparin D, Moreira EJ, Souza EM, De-Deus G, Arias A, Silva EJ. Postoperative pain after endodontic retreatment using rotary or reciprocating instruments: A randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1084-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.010 PMid:28477995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.010
Al Rahabi M. Rethinking postoperative pain after nonsurgical root canal treatment : Understanding, prevention, and management-review. Acta Sci Dent Sci. 2018;2(9):40-5.
Ince B, Ercan E, Dalli M, Dulgergil CT, Zorba YO, Colak H. Incidence of postoperative pain after single-and multi-visit endodontic treatment in teeth with vital and non-vital pulp. Eur J Dent. 2009;3(4):273-9. PMid:19826598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697444
Eldin MM, Roshdy NN, Fouda MY. A comparative assessment of the effect of pretreatment dexamethasone versus placebo on post-endodontic pain and success of inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A blinded randomized clinical trial therapeutic study. Acta Sci Dent Sci. 2020;4(5):60-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31080/ASDS.2020.04.0836
Alves FR, Andrade-Junior CV, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Rôças IN, Versiani MA, et al. Adjunctive steps for disinfection of the mandibular molar root canal system: A correlative bacteriologic, micro-computed tomography, and cryopulverization approach. J Endod. 2016;42(11):1667-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.003 PMid:27641947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.003
Azim AA, Aksel H, Zhuang T, Mashtare T, Babu JP, Huang GT. Efficacy of 4 irrigation protocols in killing bacteria colonized in dentinal tubules examined by a novel confocal laser scanning microscope analysis. J Endod. 2016;42(6):928-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.009 PMid:27130334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.009
Layton G, Wu WI, Selvaganapathy PR, Friedman S, Kishen A. Fluid dynamics and biofilm removal generated by syringedelivered and 2 ultrasonic-assisted irrigation methods: A novel experimental approach. J Endod. 2015;41(6):884-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.027 PMid:25749254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.027
van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2007;40(6):415-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x PMid:17442017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x
Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985;11(11):472-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80220-X PMid:3868692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80220-X
Romualdo PC, de Oliveira KM, Nemezio MA, Küchler EC, Silva RA, Nelson-Filho P, et al. Does apical negative pressure prevent the apical extrusion of debris and irrigant compared with conventional irrigation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Endod J. 2017;43(3):129-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12162 PMid:28150896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12162
Carvalho MC, Zuolo ML, Arruda-Vasconcelos R, Marinho AC, Louzada LM, Francisco PA, et al. Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher in the reduction of bacterial load in oval-shaped root canals. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e021. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0021 PMid:31508722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0021
Xin Y, Yang J, Song KY. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;37(1):48-52. https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2019.01.009 PMid:30854818
Nangia D, Nawal RR, Yadav S, Talwar S. Influence of final apical width on smear layer removal efficacy of Xp endo finisher and endodontic needle: An Ex vivo study. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(1):18-22. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.58076 PMid:32342033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.58076
Gündoğar M, Sezgin GP, Kaplan SS, Özyürek H, Uslu G, Özyürek T. Postoperative pain after different irrigation activation techniques: A randomized, clinical trial. Odontology. 2021;109(2):385-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00553-5 PMid:32915346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00553-5
Yusufoglu SI, Keskin NB, Saricam E, Bozkurt DA. Comparison of apical debris extrusion using EDDY, passive ultrasonic activation and photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming irrigation activation devices. Aust Endod J. 2020;46(3):400-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12429 PMid:32881182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12429
FDSXF [Brochure]. La FDSA. Chaux-de-Fonds. Availabe from: https://pdf.medicalexpo.com/pdf/fkg-dentaire/ xp-endofinisher/72216-182285.html.
Al-Nahlawi T, Hatab TA, Alrazak MA, Al-Abdullah A. Effect of intracanal cryotherapy and negative irrigation technique on postendodontic pain. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(12):990-6. PMid:27965485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1969
Živković S, Nešković J, Jovanović-Medojević M, Popović-Bajić M, Živković-Sandić M. XP-endo finisher: A new solution for smear layer removal. Stomatoloski Glasnik Srbije. 2019;62(3):122-9. https://doi.org/10.1515/sdj-2015-0013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sdj-2015-0013
Bao P, Shen Y, Lin J, Haapasalo M. In vitro efficacy of XP-endo finisher with 2 different protocols on biofilm removal from apical root canals. J Endod. 2017;43(2):321-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.021 PMid:27939826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.021
Ashraf Y, Khalaf A, Hashem AA, Kamel WH, Badr MM. Postoperative pain after different root canal irrigant activation methods; (Randomized Clinical Trial). Future Dent J. 2021;7(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.7011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.7011
Kfir A, Moza-Levi R, Herteanu M, Weissman A, Wigler R. Apical extrusion of debris during the preparation of oval root canals: A comparative study between a full-sequence SAF system and a rotary file system supplemented by XP-endo finisher file. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):707-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2144-9 PMid:28608053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2144-9
Azimian S, Bakhtiar H, Azimi S, Esnaashari E. In vitro effect of XP-Endo finisher on the amount of residual debris and smear layer on the root canal walls. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16(3):179-84. PMid:31040874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.255740
De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, de Siqueira Zuolo A, Perez R, Carvalho MS, Souza EM, et al. Micro-CT comparison of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation as final irrigation protocols on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris from oval shaped-canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(7):3087-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2729-y PMid:30417226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2729-y
Singh RD, Khatter R, Bal RK, Bal CS. Intracanal medications versus placebo in reducing postoperative endodontic pain--a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(1):25-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302039 PMid:23657409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302039
Elsaka S, Hussein W, Hashem A, Soliman A. The effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation or xp-endo finisher on post-operative pain in patients with necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial). Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022;10(D):197-204. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9222
Holland R, Filho JE, Cintra LT, Queiroz IO, Estrela C. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(5):465-76. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464 PMid:29069143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464
Shetty VP, Naik BD, Pachlag AK, Yeli MM. Comparative evaluation of the amount of debris extruded apically using conventional syringe, passive ultrasonic irrigation and EndoIrrigator Plus system: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(6):411-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_200_17 PMid:29430092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_200_17
Khalap ND, Kokate S, Hegde V. Ultrasonic versus sonic activation of the final irrigant in root canals instrumented with rotary/reciprocating files: An in-vitro scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(4):368-72. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.186451 PMid:27563189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.186451
Middha M, Sangwan P, Tewari S, Duhan J. Effect of continuous ultrasonic irrigation on postoperative pain in mandibular molars with nonvital pulps: A randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2017;50(6):522-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12666 PMid:27248848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12666
Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J. 2015;41(2):78-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12076 PMid:25195661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12076
Konstantinidi E, Psimma Z, Chávez de Paz LE, Boutsioukis C. Apical negative pressure irrigation versus syringe irrigation: A systematic review of cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system. Int Endod J. 2017;50(11):1034-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12725 PMid:27898180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12725
Estevez R, Conde AJ, de Pablo OV, de la Torre F, Rossi-Fedele G, Cisneros R. Effect of passive ultrasonic activation on organic tissue dissolution from simulated grooves in root canals using sodium hypochlorite with or without surfactants and EDTA. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1161-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.041 PMid:28416316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.041
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmed Ashraf, Wael Hussein, Ahmed Hashem, Amgad Soliman (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0