Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation versus Anatomical Repair with Hamstrings of the ACL – A Clinical Data Comparison Study


  • Dritan Todhe Department of Orthopedic, University Trauma Hospital, Tirana, Albania
  • Rezart Çipi Department of Orthopedic, University Trauma Hospital, Tirana, Albania
  • Alban Hysenaj Department of Orthopedic, University Trauma Hospital, Tirana, Albania



ACL repair, Internal brace, Anatomical repair


AIM: Investigation into the clinical results of internal brace ligament augmentation technique compared to the simple anatomical repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

METHODS: From May 2016 to November 2019, 128 patients underwent an operation using the internal brace technique. During the same time, 104 patients were operated on using the simple anatomical ACL repair. The mean age was 22.5-year-old for the first group and 26.8-year- old for the second one. The minimum follow-up was 24 months. All the patients performed an X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging. Two hypotheses were raised to assess the superiority of the internal brace technique versus the anatomical one in the early post-operative phase and the rehabilitation one.

RESULTS: The mean operation time was 71 (65–75) min for the internal brace (IB) and 62 (55–65) for the anatomical. We had two post-operative infected knees in the first group (IB) and no infection in the second one. The clinical stability test results were much better in the IB group using the KT 1000. The rehabilitation phase showed a superior IB technique. The return to sport-time of the sportsmen was 6 months for the first group and 7–8 months for the anatomical. All the IB-operated patients found physiotherapy significantly easier than the anatomical ones.

CONCLUSIONS: IB-technique performs better clinical outcomes than the anatomical repair. The presence of a foreign body (Ultrabraid) inside the knee may be a risk factor contributing toward the elevated infection rate. The IB technique costs are significantly more expensive compared to the anatomical but the low physiotherapy costs compensate for the final result.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block


Schindler OS. The story of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Perioper Pract. 2012;22(4):163-71. PMid:22720509 DOI:

Migonney V. History of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Prosthesis, Chapter Two. LBPS/CSPBAT, Institut Galilée, Université Paris 13 Sorbonne Paris Cité, 99 Avenue Jean Baptiste Clément 93430 Villetaneuse. Available from: [Last accessed on 2022 Jul 05].

Kopf S, Fu FH, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ. Transtibial ACL reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels anatomically in vivo 3D CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(11):2200-7. PMid:22210518 DOI:

Golan EJ, Meredith SJ, Nakamura T, Rothrauff BB, Fu FH. Anatomic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: Concept, indication and its efficacy. Ann Jt. 2019;4:9. DOI:

Timothy Hosea. ACL Reconstruction: Techniques and Avoiding Pitfalls, Life in Motion. Available from: https://www.uoanj.com1-855-uoa-docs [Last accessed on 2022 Jul 01].

Grifstad T, Foss OA, Engebretsen L, Lind M, Forssblad M, Albrektsen G, et al. Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: A registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2319-28. PMid:25201444 DOI:

Van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FU. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(2):258-68. PMid:20141990 DOI:

Van Eck CF, Martins CA, Vyas SM, Celentano U, van Dijk CN, Fu FH. Femoral intercondylar notch shape and dimensions in ACL-injured patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(9):1257-62. PMid:20390246 DOI:

Wilson WT, Hopper GP, Byrne PA, MacKay GM. Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace ligament augmentation. Surg Technol Int. 2016;29:273-8. PMid:27728954 DOI:

Van Eck CF, Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM. Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: A meta-analysis of physical examinations with and without anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(8):1895-903. PMid:23085822 DOI:

Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP. Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: A meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(5):267-88. PMid:16715828 DOI:

Musahl V, Ayeni OR, Citak M, Irrgang JJ, Pearle AD, Wickiewicz TL. The influence of bony morphology on the magnitude of the pivot shift. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(9):1232-8. PMid:20376621 DOI:

Neuman P, Kostogiannis I, Friden T, Roos H, Dahlberg LE, Englund M. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury--a prospective cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(3):284-90. PMid:18771938 DOI:

Shelbourne KD, Nitz P. Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(3):292-9. PMid:2372081 DOI:




How to Cite

Todhe D, Çipi R, Hysenaj A. Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation versus Anatomical Repair with Hamstrings of the ACL – A Clinical Data Comparison Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 10 [cited 2023 Mar. 31];10(A):1649-52. Available from:



Sports Medicine