Experience of Vacuum-Assisted Closure in the Surgical Treatment of Malignant Skin Tumors after Skin Grafting

Authors

  • Sergii Korovin Department of Skin and Soft Tissue Tumors, National Cancer Institute of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5409-5194
  • Vasyl Ostafiichuk Department of Skin and Soft Tissue Tumors, National Cancer Institute of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Serhii Diedkov Department of Skin and Soft Tissue Tumors, National Cancer Institute of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Mariia Kukushkina Department of Skin and Soft Tissue Tumors, National Cancer Institute of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9197-9776

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.11046

Keywords:

Skin tumors, Grafts, Vacuum-assisted closure

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skin grafts may be used to reconstruct large skin defects after the excision of malignant skin tumors. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) leads closer approximation of the free flap.

AIM: The objective of this study was to estimate the engraftment of grafts using VAC and explore factors influencing this process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 31 patients with skin cancers after a wide tumor excision. The wound defects were closed using a split-thickness skin graft and the VAC dressing.

RESULTS: Complete and partial engraftment was observed in 17 (54.8 %) and 14 (45.2%) cases, respectively. The mean area of the wound defects among patients with complete engraftment was 24.3 ± 20.6 cm2, while that of the group with partial engraftments was 56.5 ± 58.8 cm2 (p = 0.0017). In the complete engraftment group, the average number of days with the VAC dressing was 7.2 ± 0.44 days, versus 6.9 ± 0.27 days in the partial engraftment group (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION: VAC dressing after skin grafting in the surgical management of malignant skin tumors provided good results. The area of the wound defect and the average number of days with VAC dressing is significant factors influencing the outcomes of skin grafting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Swetter SM, Tsao H, Bichakjian CK, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Elder DE, Gershenwald JE, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad of Dermatol. 2019;80(1):208-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.055 PMid:30392755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.055

Peris K, Fargnoli MC, Garbe C, Kaufmann R, Bastholt L, Seguin NB, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2019;118:10-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.003 PMid:31288208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.003

Yin Y, Zhang R, Li S, Guo J, Hou Z, Zhang Y. Negative-pressure therapy versus conventional therapy on split-thickness skin graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;50:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.020 PMid:29292216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.020

Downloads

Published

2022-11-26

How to Cite

1.
Korovin S, Ostafiichuk V, Diedkov S, Kukushkina M. Experience of Vacuum-Assisted Closure in the Surgical Treatment of Malignant Skin Tumors after Skin Grafting. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 26 [cited 2024 Nov. 12];10(B):2520-2. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/11046