Impact of Post-operative Radiological Parameters on Total Knee Arthroplasty Functional Outcome

Authors

  • Karim Turki Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Main Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-2890
  • Achraf Abdennadher Medicine University of Tunis, Tunis el Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
  • Youssef Mallat Medicine University of Tunis, Tunis el Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
  • Rabie Ayari Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Main Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-0022
  • Ramy Triki Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Main Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
  • Khalil Amri Medicine University of Tunis, Tunis el Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11360

Keywords:

Knee osteoarthritis, Total knee arthroplasty, Goniometry, functional outcome

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is effective in treating end-stage osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, 20% of patients remain unsatisfied with the outcome at 1 year.

AIM: The aim of our study was to identify the radiological parameters influencing the functional result and patient’s quality of life (QOL).

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent primary TKA between 2015 and 2019. Standard radiographs were used to assess alignment parameters, patellar height, and implant size. Knee function was assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the QOL through the “Sfax modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC).”

RESULTS: One hundred and twenty cases were analyzed. The results in terms of alignment showed on average: an overall alignment of 2.41° varus, a coronal orientation of the femoral component of 5.49° of valgus, a coronal orientation of the tibial component of 2.16° of varus, a flexion of the femoral component of 0.7°, and a tibial slope of 2.6° with posterior orientation. We identified 19 cases of Patella baja (PB) and seven cases of pseudo PB. We identified 18 cases of oversizing of the femoral implant and six cases of undersizing. The tibial implant was oversized in ten cases and undersized in three cases. Global alignment of the limb and coronal alignment of the tibial component significantly influenced KSS and WOMAC scores. There was also a significant association between patellar height, knee function, and QOL. Femoral component size and overhang of the tibial component showed a significant influence only on WOMAC score.

CONCLUSION: Standard radiography can be effective and reliable to evaluate TKAs. According to our results, we may suggest a checklist aiming to optimize knee function and patient’s QOL. It should include mechanical alignment of the limb, coronal alignment of tibial component, prevention of iatrogenic patellar tendon shortening, and precision in implant size choice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Steinhaus ME, Christ AB, Cross MB. Total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: Support for a foregone conclusion? HSS J. 2017;13(2):207-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9558-4 PMid:28690473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9558-4

Shan L, Shan B, Suzuki A, Nouh F, Saxena A. Intermediate and long-term quality of life after total knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(2):156-68. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00372 PMid:25609443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00372

De Cassai A, Boscolo A, Tonetti T, Ban I, Ori C. Assignment of ASA-physical status relates to anesthesiologists’ experience: A survey-based national-study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(1):53-9. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.d.18.00224 PMid:30424587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.d.18.00224

Emrani PS, Katz JN, Kessler CL, Reichmann WM, Wright EA, McAlindon TE, et al. Joint space narrowing and Kellgren- Lawrence progression in knee osteoarthritis: An analytic literature synthesis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(8):873-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.004 PMid:18280757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.004

Sheehy L, Felson D, Zhang Y, Niu J, Lam YM, Segal N, et al. Does measurement of the anatomic axis consistently predict hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) for knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis of long limb radiographs from the multicenter osteoarthritis (MOST) study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19(1):58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2010.09.011 PMid:20950695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2010.09.011

Ewald FC. The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12. PMid:2805502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198911000-00003

Lum ZC, Saiz AM, Pereira GC, Meehan JP. Patella baja in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(8):316-23. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00422 PMid:31934927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00422

Blackburne JS, Peel TE. A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1977;59(2):241-2. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.59B2.873986 PMid:873986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.59B2.873986

Grelsamer RP. Patella baja after total knee arthroplasty: Is it really patella baja? J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(1):66-9. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.28728 PMid:11805927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.28728

Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(1):50-3. https: doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.12432 PMid:11837832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.0840050

Benazzo F, Ghiara M, Rossi SM, Pruneri E, Tiwari V, Perelli S. Clinical and radiological analysis of a personalized total knee arthroplasty system design. Int Orthop. 2019;43(5):1113-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4095-4 PMid:30128671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4095-4

Giesinger JM, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Behrend H, Giesinger K. WOMAC, EQ-5D and knee society score thresholds for treatment success after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(12):2154-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.012 PMid:26160647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.012

Guermazi M, Poiraudeau S, Yahia M, Mezganni M, Fermanian J, Elleuch MH, et al. Translation, adaptation and validation of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) for an Arab population: The Sfax modified WOMAC. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12(6):459-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.006 PMid:15135142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.006

Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(4):560-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018 PMid:18534397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018

Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG, Husted H, Troelsen A. What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop. 2014;85(5):480-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.940573 PMid:25036719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.940573

Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(4):570-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.002 PMid:18534396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.002

Rassir R, van de Bunt F, Sierevelt IN, Nolte PA. The value of postoperative prosthesis alignment and patellar height measurements on standard X-rays after total knee arthroplasty: Does it relate to knee function after 5 years? Knee. 2019;26(1):213-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2018.09.014 PMid:30467023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2018.09.014

Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000148578.22729.0e PMid:15534515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000148578.22729.0e

Gao ZX, Long NJ, Zhang SY, Yu W, Dai YX, Xiao C. Comparison of kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(6):1567-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12826 PMid:33099892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12826

Young SW, Sullivan NP, Walker ML, Holland S, Bayan A, Farrington B. No difference in 5-year clinical or radiographic outcomes between kinematic and mechanical alignment in TKA: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(6):1271-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001150 PMid:32039955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001150

Hadi M, Barlow T, Ahmed I, Dunbar M, McCulloch P, Griffin D. Does malalignment affect patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2790-4 PMid:27516939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2790-4

Murphy M, Journeaux S, Hides J, Russell T. Does flexion of the femoral implant in total knee arthroplasty increase knee flexion: A randomised controlled trial. Knee. 2014;21(1):257-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.028 PMid:23183371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.028

Singh G, Tan JH, Sng BY, Awiszus F, Lohmann CH, Nathan SS.

Restoring the anatomical tibial slope and limb axis may maximise post-operative flexion in posterior-stabilised total knee replacements. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(10):1354-8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31477 PMid:24078531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31477

Behrend H, Graulich T, Gerlach R, Spross C, Ladurner A. Blackburne-peel ratio predicts patients’ outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(5):1562-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5016-1 PMid:29881887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5016-1

Kazemi SM, Besheli LD, Eajazi A, Sajadi MR, Okhovatpoor MA, Zanganeh RF, et al. Pseudo-patella baja after total knee arthroplasty. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17(5):CR292-6. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.881770 PMid:21525812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.881770

Chonko DJ, Lombardi AV Jr., Berend KR. Patella baja and total knee arthroplasty (TKA): Etiology, diagnosis, and management. Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:231-8. PMid:15455331

Noyes FR, Wojtys EM, Marshall MT. The early diagnosis and treatment of developmental patella infera syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;265:241-52. PMid:2009665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199104000-00028

Weale AE, Murray DW, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE. The length of the patellar tendon after unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(5):790-5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b5.9590 PMid:10530838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.0810790

Flören M, Davis J, Peterson MG, Laskin RS. A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 Suppl 2): 51-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.008 PMid:17823016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.008

Arabori M, Matsui N, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Doita M, Kurosaka M, et al. Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate- retaining and posterior stabilized TKA. J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop. 2008;13(1):46-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1191-5 PMid:18274855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1191-5

Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM. In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:107-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199610000-00015 PMid:8895626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199610000-00015

Banks S, Bellemans J, Nozaki H, Whiteside LA, Harman M, Hodge WA. Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:131-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000063121.39522.19 PMid:12771823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000063121.39522.19

Koh YG, Son J, Kwon OR, Kwon SK, Kang KT. Effect of post- cam design for normal knee joint kinematic, ligament, and quadriceps force in patient-specific posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty by using finite element analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2438980. htttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2438980 PMid:30327775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2438980

Barnes CL, Scott RD. Popliteus tendon dysfunction following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10(4):543-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80159-7 PMid:8523017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80159-7

Lo CS, Wang SJ, Wu SS. Knee stiffness on extension caused by an oversized femoral component after total knee arthroplasty: A report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(6):804-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00331-0 PMid:14513459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00331-0

McArthur J, Makrides P, Thangarajah T, Brooks S. Tibial component overhang in total knee replacement: Incidence and functional outcomes. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78(2):199-202. PMid:22696990

Bonnin MP, Schmidt A, Basiglini L, Bossard N, Dantony E. Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after

TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2314-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2443-x PMid:23404515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2443-x

Liu C, Zhao G, Chen K, Lyu J, Chen J, Shi J, et al. Tibial component coverage affects tibial bone resorption and patient- reported outcome measures for patients following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02250-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02250-7

Nielsen CS, Nebergall A, Huddleston J, Kallemose T, Malchau H, Troelsen A. Medial overhang of the tibial component is associated with higher risk of inferior knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score pain after knee Replacement. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1394-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.027 PMid:29452971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.027

Davies AP. Rating systems for total knee replacement. Knee. 2002;9(4):261-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0160(02)00095-9 PMid:12424032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00095-9

Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB. Validity and responsiveness of the knee society clinical rating system in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;83(12):1856-64. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200112000-00014 PMid:11741066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200112000-00014

Downloads

Published

2023-01-24

How to Cite

1.
Turki K, Abdennadher A, Mallat Y, Ayari R, Triki R, Amri K. Impact of Post-operative Radiological Parameters on Total Knee Arthroplasty Functional Outcome. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 24 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];11(B):432-8. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/11360