Effect of Air Abrasion on Delayed Dentin Sealing Post-operative Sensitivity for Indirect Resin Composite Restorations

F .M. Ahmed; M. S.  Farag; M. F.  Haridi; A. F. Abo Elezz; A. F. Ghoniem

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2023.11478

Authors

F .M. Ahmed Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-7222
M. S. Farag Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
M. F. Haridi Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-1557
A. F. Abo Elezz Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
A. F. Ghoniem Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11478

Keywords:

Air abrasion, aluminium oxide, surface treatment, Visual Analog Scale, Postoperative sensitivity, Delayed dentin sealing, VAS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are several treatment options available to reduce the post-operative sensitivity (POS) of indirect resin composite restorations.

AIM: This study was to evaluate the effect of air abrasion on delayed dentin sealing POS for indirect resin composite restorations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients between the ages of 18 and 30 were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, with 14 teeth (n = 14) in each group. Following the collection of baseline pre- operative data, the diagnosis of caries was made based on the clinical examination and radiographic examination, and all cavities were prepared. Group one (G1) prepared cavities were exposed to airborne particles before the selective etch technique was used without the use of cementation, and the selective etch technique was used. In the second group (G2), air abrasion during cementation. The visual analog scale was used to evaluate POS at baseline, 1 day after cavity preparation (T1), 1 week after indirect composite restoration cementation (T2), 3 months (T3), and 12 months (T4).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of distribution parameters first, and then, for non-parametric distributions, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to assess the interaction between different variables. The Mann–Whitney U-test was then used to compare the two groups.

RESULTS: Despite air abrasion’s effect, there was no statistically significant change in scores between the G1 and G2 groups. POS was highest at T1, then T2, T3, and T4. Statistically, these differences were significant (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between T2, T3, and T4 with or without air abrasion.

CONCLUSION: The delayed dentin sealing POS is unaffected by air abrasion during indirect resin restorations’ cementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconcini S, Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: A 3-year study. Quintessence Int. 2008;39(1):65-71. PMid:18551219

De Cássia Silva Duquia R, Osinaga PW, Demarco FF, de V Habekost L, Conceição EN. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: In vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite. Oper Dent. 2006;31(6):682-7. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-132 PMid:17153977

Duarte S Jr., de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)00073-0 PMid:19573687

Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: Sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod. 1986;12(10):453-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80198-4 PMid:3465849

Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Postcementation hypersensitivity: Scientific data versus dentists’ perceptions. J Prosthodont. 2003;12(2):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00010-X PMid:12964679

Camps J, Déjou J, Rémusat M, About I. Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations. Dent Mater. 2000;16(6):432-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00041-5 PMid:10967193

Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, et al. Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass- ionomer adhesive. Dent Mater. 2001;17(5):445-55. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00003-3 PMid:11445212

Landuyt KV, Munck JD, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Meerbeek BV. Bonding to dentin: Smear layer and the process of hybridization. In: Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 89-122.

Huang CT, Kim J, Arce C, Lawson NC. Intraoral air abrasion: A review of devices, materials, evidence, and clinical applications in restorative dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2019;40(8):508-13. PMid:31478697

Mujdeci A, Gokay O. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength of four restorative materials to enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(3):245-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.007 PMid:15343159

De Souza-Zaroni WC, Delfino CS, Ciccone-Nogueira JC, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Effect of cavity preparation method on microtensile bond strength of a self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant to enamel. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(10):2003-9. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3121-7 PMid:17558478

Nikaido T, Kataumi M, Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Bond strengths of resin to enamel and dentin treated with low-pressure air abrasion. Oper Dent. 1996;21(5):218-24. PMid:9484176

Roeder LB, Berry EA 3rd, You C, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 1995;20(5):186-90. PMid:8710697

Los SA, Barkmeier WW. Effects of dentin air abrasion with aluminum oxide and hydroxyapatite on adhesive bond strength. Oper Dent. 1994;19(5):169-75. PMid:8700756

Malkoc MA, Taşdemir ST, Ozturk AN, Ozturk B, Berk G. Effects of laser and acid etching and air abrasion on mineral content of dentin. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(1):21-7. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0751-7 PMid:20084534

Sauro S, Watson TF, Thompson I. Dentine desensitization induced by prophylactic and air-polishing procedures: An in vitro dentine permeability and confocal microscopy study. J Dent. 2010;38(5):411-22. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.010 PMid:20132859

Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200-7. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583 PMid:23295957

Hu J, Zhu Q. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on preventive treatment for post cementation hypersensitivity. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(1):49-52. PMid:20234892

Dillenburg AL, Soares CG, Paranhos MP, Spohr AM, Loguercio AD, Burnett LH Jr. Microtensile bond strength of prehybridized dentin: Storage time and surface treatment effects. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(3):231-7. PMid:19603587

Farhadifard H, Rezaei-Soufi L, Farhadian M, Shokouhi P. Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to old composite. Biomater Res. 2020;24(1):20. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-020-00199-y PMid:33292632

Burrow MF, Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Messer HH. Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite--a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2009;34(6):648-55. http://doi.org/10.2341/08-098-C PMid:19953773

Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally invasive operative care. I. Minimal intervention and concepts for minimally invasive cavity preparations. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(1):7-16. PMid:11317386

Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: A new concept for operative dentistry. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(8):527-33. PMid:11203973

Medina AD, de Paula AB, de Fucio SB, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(6):672-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402012000600008 PMid:23338259

Nandini S. Indirect resin composites. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):184-94. http://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73377 PMid:21217945

Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent. 2007;35(12):897-902. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.002 PMid:17977638

Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(2):71-9. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0201-z PMid:12740693

Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.011 PMid:27452342

Hannig M, Femerling T. Influence of air-abrasion treatment on the interfacial bond between composite and dentin. Oper Dent. 1998;23(5):258-65. PMid:9863447

Canay S, Kocadereli I, Ak”ca E. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(1):15-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70243-5 PMid:10629515

Berry EA 3rd, Ward M. Bond strength of resin composite to air- abraded enamel. Quintessence Int. 1995;26(8):559-62. PMid:8602432

Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 1998;26(7):555-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00042-0 PMid:9754743

Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self- etch adhesive: Effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(12):1621-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0109 PMid:14719760

Gordan VV, Mjör IA. Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer. Oper Dent. 2002;27(6):543-8.

Sahin C, Cehreli ZC, Yenigul M, Dayangac B. In vitro permeability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives used for immediate dentin sealing. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(3):401-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-217 PMid:22673465

West NX, Sanz M, Lussi A, Bartlett D, Bouchard P, Bourgeois D. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: A European population-based cross-sectional study. J Dent. 2013;41(10):841-51. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.017 PMid:23911597

Antunes LA, Pedro RL, Vieira AS, Maia LC. Effectiveness of high speed instrument and air abrasion on different dental substrates. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22(3):235-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242008000300008 PMid:18949309

Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Dibb RP, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pécora JD. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er: YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent. 2001;26(5):491-7. PMid:11551014

Nikaido T, Yoda A, Foxton RM, Tagami J. A resin coating technique to achieve minimal intervention in indirect resin composites: A clinical report. Int Chin J Dent. 2003;3:62-8.

Fu B, Hannig M. Effects of air abrasion and acid etching on the microleakage of preventive Class I resin restorations: An in vitro study. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(3):143-8. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00391.x PMid:10825871

Ivanović V, Savić-Stanković T, Karadzić B, Ilić J, Santini A, Beljić-lvanović K. Postoperative sensitivity associated with low shrinkage versus conventional composites. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2013;141(7-8):447-53. http://doi.org/10.2298/sarh1308447i PMid:24073549

Manchorova NA, Vladimirov SB, Donencheva ZK, Drashkovich IS, Kozhuharov PZ, Manolov SK, et al. A study of post-operative sensitivity in class I and class II restorations with self-etching adhesive and nanofilled composite. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2006;48(2):63-9. PMid:17408079