Assessing Percentage of Touched Surfaces and Changes in Cross-sectional Area in Oval Shaped Root Canals after XP-endo Shaper, IRaCe and HyFlex CM Instrumentation Using AutoCAD Software

Pola  Bekheit; Mohamed  Rabie; Hayam Y. Hassan

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2023.11643

Authors

Pola Bekheit Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8476-4914
Mohamed Rabie Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
Hayam Y. Hassan Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-3541

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11643

Keywords:

Oval shaped root canals, XP-endo Shaper, IRaCe,, HyFlex CM,, AutoCAD

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to calculate the percentage of touched surfaces and changes in the cross-sectional area of oval-shaped root canals after preparation using (XP-endo Shaper, IRace, and HyFlex CM) rotary systems using AutoCAD software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars were collected and divided into three main groups according to the rotary system used (n = 20). Each tooth was impeded in a resin block, coded, sectioned, and photographed under a stereomicroscope, before and after instrumentation. Microphotographs were analyzed using AutoCAD software. Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the mean percentage of the touched surface and mean cross- sectional area between the groups and tooth segments, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for pair-wise comparisons.

RESULTS: The percentage of touched canal walls was significantly different between IRace group and each of XP-endo Shaper and HyFlex CM groups (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was recorded for the mean change in the cross-sectional areas of the root canal between IRace group and both HyFlex CM and XP-endo Shaper groups, respectively (p < 0.001). For all groups, there was a significant difference in the change in the cross- sectional area between all segments (coronal, middle, and apical).

CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the XP-endo Shaper and HyFlex CM files had a higher cutting efficiency and maintained better root stability than the IRaCe system by preserving the dentin of the oval root canal. This was observed at all the canal levels in the coronal, middle, and apical segments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

Author Biographies

Pola Bekheit , Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

Resident Dentist, Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

Hayam Y. Hassan, Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

Professor, Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

References

Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J. 2003;36(3):218-24. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00646.x PMid:12657148

Eid G, Amin S. Changes in diameter, cross-sectional area, and extent of canal-wall touching on using 3 instrumentation techniques in long-oval canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:688-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.007 PMid:21862367

Khoshbin E, Shokri A, Donyavi Z, Shahriari S, Salehimehr G, Farhadian M, et al. Comparison of the root canal debridement ability of two single file systems with a conventional multiple rotary system in long oval-shaped root canals: In vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(8):e939-44. http://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52977 PMid:28936281

Nangia D, Nawal RR, Yadav S, Talwar S. Influence of final apical width on smear layer removal efficacy of Xp endo finisher and endodontic needle: An ex vivo study. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(1):18-22. https://doi.org/10.14744%2Feej.2019.58076 PMid:32342033

Arvaniti IS, Khabbaz MG. Influence of root canal taper on its cleanliness: A scanning electron microscopic study. Endod J.

;37(6):871-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.025 PMid:21787508

Liang Y, Yue L. Evolution and development: Engine-driven endodontic rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14(1):12. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-021-00154-0 PMid:35181648

Habib A, Taha M, Farah E. Methodologies used in quality assessment of root canal preparation techniques. J. Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2015;10(2):123-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2014.11.002

Musale PK, Jain KR, Kothare SS. Comparative assessment of dentin removal following hand and rotary instrumentation in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(1):80-6. http://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_210_18 PMid:30804312

Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Torsional resistance of XP-endo shaper at body temperature compared with several nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2018;51(5):572-6. http://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12815 PMid:28700083

Versiani MA, Carvalho KK, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Sousa-Neto MD. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo shaper, iRaCe, and edge file systems in long oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2018;44(3):489-95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.008 PMid:29273492

Ba-Hattab RA, Pahncke D. Shaping ability of superelastic and controlled memory nickel-titanium file systems: An in vitro study. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:6050234. http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6050234 PMid:30275832

Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: Its significance in research design and methods to achieve it. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(6):684-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.014 PMid:21320892

Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):3-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00129.x

Wu MK, Wesselink PR. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J. 2001;34(2):137-41. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00361.x PMid:11307262

Sandhya R, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Assessment of root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in the Indian population using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(2):169-73. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.66626 PMid:20657082

Shah DY, Wadekar SI, Dadpe AM, Jadhav GR, Choudhary LJ, Kalra DD. Canal transportation and centering ability of protaper and self-adjusting file system in long oval canals: An ex-vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(2):105-9. http://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212234 PMid:28855757

Azim AA, Piasecki L, da Silva Neto UX, Cruz A, Azim K. XP shaper, a novel adaptive core rotary instrument: Micro- computed tomographic analysis of its shaping abilities. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1532-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.022 PMid:28735789

Boreak NM, Inamdar MN, Khan S, Merdad KA, Jabali A, Albar N, et al. Evaluation of the root canal cross-sectional morphology in maxillary and mandibular premolars in Saudi sub population. Saudi Endod J. 2022;12:17-24.

Al-Ali SM, Saeed MH, Almjali F. Assessment of three root canal preparation techniques on root canal geometry using micro-computed tomography: In vitro study. Saudi Endod J. 2012;2:29-35.

Alfadley A, Alrajhi A, Alissa H, Alzeghaibi F, Hamadah L, Alfouzan K, et al. Shaping ability of XP Endo shaper file in curved root canal models. Int J Dent. 2020;2020:4687045. http://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4687045 PMid:32148503

Razumova S, Brago A, Howijieh A, Barakat H, Manvelyan, Kozlova Y. An in vitro evaluation study of the geometric changes of root canal preparation and the quality of endodontic treatment. Int J Dent. 2020;2020:8883704. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8883704 PMid:32849874

Weiger R, ElAyouti A, Löst C. Efficiency of hand and rotary instrumentsinshapingovalrootcanals.JEndod.2002;28(8):580-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200208000-00004 PMid:12184418

Velozo C, Prado VF, Sousa IS, Albuquerque MB, Montenegro L, Silva S, et al. Scope of Preparation of oval and long-oval root canals: A review of the literature. ScientificWorldJournal. 2021;2021:5330776. http://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5330776 PMid:34475808

Paqué F, Balmer M, Attin T, Peters O. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2010;36(4):703-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.020 PMid:20307747

Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges R. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Enod. 1987;13(5):243-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(87)80099-7 PMid:3473181

Chauhan NS, Saraswat N, Parashar A, Sandu KS, Jhajharia K, Rabadiya N. Comparison of the effect for fracture resistance of different coronally extended post length with two different post materials. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9(2):144-51. http://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_334_18 PMid:31058064

Mokashi P, Shah J, Chandrasekhar P, Kulkarni G, Podar R, Singh S. Comparison of the penetration depth of five root canal sealers: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24:199-203. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_364_19 PMid:34759590

De Vasconcelos RA, Murphy S, Carvalho CA, Govindjee RG, Govindjee S, Peters OA. Evidence for reduced fatigue resistance of contemporary rotary instruments exposed to body temperature. J Endod. 2016;42(5):782-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.025 PMid:26993574

Hamed SA, Shabayek S, Hassan HY. Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):660. http://doi.org/10.1186/ s12903-022-02690-5 PMid:36585632

Günday M, Sazak H, Garip Y. A comparative study of three different rootcanal curvature measurement techniques and measuring the canal access angle in curved canals. J Endod. 2005;31(11):796-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000158232.77240.01 PMid:16249721

Kim HC, Kwak S, Cheung G, Ko D, Chung S, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod. 2012;38(4):541-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.014 PMid:22414846

Al-Manei KK, Al-Hadlaq SM. Evaluation of the root canal shaping ability of two rotary nickel-titanium systems. Int Endod J. 2014;47(10):974-9. http://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12243 PMid:24387043

Cabanillas C, Monterde M, Pallarés A, Aranda S, Montes R. Assessment using AutoCAD software of the preparation of dentin walls in root canals produced by 4 different endodontic instrument systems. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:517203. http://doi.org/10.1155/2015/517203 PMid:26664361

Hassan HY, Ragab MH, Issa NO, Elshaboury EI, Negm AM. Pulp volume changes after root canal preparation with three single nickel titanium files using cone beam computed tomography: A Randomized clinical trial. Egypt Dent J. 2022;68:3895-903. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2022.143734.2143

Peters OA, Gluskin AK, Weiss RA, Han JT. An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of novel Hyflex nickel- titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2012;45(11):1027-34. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02067.x PMid:22563821

Saber SE, Nagy MM, Schafer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, IRaCe and HyFlex CM rotary NiTi files in severly curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2015;48(2):131-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12291 PMid:24697590

Pasternak-Júnior B, Sousa-Neto MD, Silva RG. Canal transportation and centring ability of RaCe rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2009;42(6):499-506. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01536.x PMid:19298575

Lacerda MF, Alves M, Pérez A, Provenzano J, Neves M, Pires F, et al. Cleaning and shaping oval canals with 3 Instrumentation systems: A correlative micro-computed tomographic and histologic study. J Endod. 2017;43(11):1878-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.032 PMid:28951035

Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink P. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: Effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod. 2000;26(4):10-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200004000-00003 PMid:11199720

Taha NA, Ozawa T, Messer HH. Comparison of three techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals. J Endod. 2010;36(3):532-5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.015 PMid:20171378

Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Jaramillo D, Versiani MA. Shaping ability of reciproc and TF adaptive systems in severely curved canals of rapid microCT-based prototyping molar replicas. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22(6):509-15. http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130705 PMid:24918662

Kishen A. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Top. 2006;13:57-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2006.00201.x

Tang W, Wu Y, Smales J. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod.

;36(4):609-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.002 PMid:20307732

Hulsmann M, Peters A, Dummer M. Mechanical preparation of root canals: Shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top. 2005;10:30-76. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x

Marceliano M, Neto S, Fidel R, Steier L, Robinson P, Pécora D, et al. Shaping ability of single-file reciprocating and heat- treated multifile rotary systems: A micro-CT study. Int Endod J. 2015;48(12):1129-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12412 PMid:25400256

Yamamura B, Cox TC, Heddaya B, Flake NM, Johnson JD, Paranjpe A. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro- computed tomography. J Endod. 2012;38(8):1121-5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.019 PMid:22794219

Gagliardi J, Versiani A, De Sousa-Neto D, Plazas A, Basrani B. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1718-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.009 PMid:26321062

Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, Zgheib C, Arbab-Chirani R, Naaman A. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2015;48(2):162-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12296 PMid:24717063

Mamede-Neto I, Borges AH, Guedes OA, de Oliveira D, Pedro FL, Estrela C. Root canal transportation and centering ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in mandibular premolars assessed using cone-beam computed tomography. Open Dent J. 2017;11:71-8. http://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010071 PMid:28357000

Falk KW, Sedgley CM. The influence of preparation size on the mechanical efficacy of root canal irrigation in vitro. J Endod. 2005;31(10):742-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000158007.56170.0c PMid:16186754

Rödig T, Hülsmann M, Mühge M, Schäfers F. Quality of preparation of oval distal root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J. 2002;35:919-28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00599.x PMid:12453021