Efficiency of Immunoblot While Determination of Antibodies to Treponema Pallidum in Cerebrospinal Fluid

Authors

  • Glib Bondarenko Sexually Transmitted Infections Department, SE Institute of Dermatology and Venerology of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-797X
  • Valentina Kutova Sexually Transmitted Infections Department https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-8969
  • Olga Bilokon Sexually Transmitted Infections Department, SE Institute of Dermatology and Venerology of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-8969
  • Inna Nikitenko Sexually Transmitted Infections Department, SE Institute of Dermatology and Venerology of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8315-7625
  • Tatiana Gubenko Sexually Transmitted Infections Department
  • Taras Dasyuk Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5529-4681

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2024.11866

Keywords:

Immunoblot, late forms of syphilis, neurosyphilis, treponemal tests

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A decrease in the incidence of syphilis has been observed in the world and in Ukraine in recent years. At the same time, an increase in cases of neurosyphilis is recorded. Diagnosis of neurosyphilis is quite difficult and based on the correct interpretation of the complex of various diagnostic tests.

OBJECTIVES: The paper is aimed to determine diagnostic potential of treponemal tests (TTs) and evaluate effectiveness of Treponema pallidum immunoblot (TPI) while research on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in differential diagnosis of neurosyphilis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research object was CSF of patients with late forms of syphilis. The regulated serological and immunological methods in accordance with current guidelines and orders of the Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine were used for laboratory diagnosis of neurosyphilis: Enzyme immunoassays (EIA), fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA), T. pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA), and TPI.

RESULTS: Effectiveness of TTs in the diagnosis of neurosyphilis while research on 23 samples of CSF was carried out by the following methods: EIA (Immunoglobulin [Ig]M + IgG), FTA, andTPHA. The above-mentioned TTs used in serological diagnosis of CSF do not always meet the problem of confirming neurosyphilis diagnosis. According to these investigations, both positive and false positive results were obtained. In order to verify the diagnosis, a study on positive and false positive samples of CSF by TPI method was carried out. Positive results were obtained in 13 samples with the established duration of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS: TPI is an optimal treponemal immunological method of examination of CSF to diagnose neurosyphilis with a high degree of reliability. The use of TPI while research on CSF makes it possible to verify the diagnosis of neurosyphilis by differentiated detection of antibodies to the most immunogenic antigens of T. pallidum eliminating the subjective factor of the reaction and simplifies diagnostic procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Tabuika O, Mushet G. On the issue of optimizing the diagnosis of latent syphilis. Ukr J Dermatol Venerol Cosmetol. 2001;1:78-

[Табуйка O, Мушет Г. К вопросу об оптиматизации диагностики скрытого сифилиса. Український журнал дерматології, венерології, косметології. 2011;1:78-82].

Katunin GL, Melekhina LE, Frigo NV. Neurosyphilis: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical picture, laboratory diagnostics. Bull Dermatol Venereol. 2013;5:40-9. [Катунин ГЛ, DOI: https://doi.org/10.25208/vdv563

Мелехина ЛЕ, Фриго НВ. Нейросифилис: эпидемиология, патогенез, клиника, лабораторна диагностика. Вестник дерматологии и венерологии. 2013;5:40-9].

Trokhimchuk TY, Gritsan TV, Zvereva OA, Dmitrieva NA, Moisa LM, Horlov YI, et al. Enzyme immunoassay test system for differentiated determination of antibodies to antigens of the causative agent of syphilis. Ukr J Dermatol Venereol Cosmetol. 2015;4(59):56-65. [Трохимчук ТЮ, Грицан ТВ, Зверева ОА, Дмитриева НА, Мойса ЛН, Горлов ЮИ, et al. Иммуноферментная тест-система для дифференцированного определения антител к антигенам возбудителя сифилиса. Український журнал дерматології, венерології, косметології. 2015;4(59):56-65].

Kutasevich YF, Kutovaya VV, Belokon ON, Bondarenko GM, Nikitenko IN, Shcherbakova YV, et al. Practical aspects of serological diagnosis of syphilis at the present stage. Dermatol Venereol. 2020;1(87):39-43. [Кутасевич ЯФ, Кутовая ВВ, Белоконь ОН, Бондаренко ГМ, Никитенко ИН, Щербакова ЮВ, et al. Практические аспекты серологической диагностики сифилиса на современном этапе. Дерматологія та венерологія. 2020;1(87):39-43]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33743/2308-1066-2020-1-39-43

Bondarenko GM, Unuchko SV, Nikitenko IN, Gubenko TV, Kutova VV. Syphilis: Current state of the problem. Dermatol Venereol. 2018;2:8-12. [Бондаренко ГМ, Унучко СВ, Никитенко ИН, Губенко ТВ, Кутова ВВ. Сифилис: Современное состояние проблемы. Дерматологія та венерологія. 2018;2:8-12].

Frigo NV, Katunin GL, Rotanov SV, Levin OS. Modern immunological methods for the study of CSF in patients with neurosyphilis. Bull Dermatol Venereol. 2011;6:49-57. [Фриго НВ, Катунин ГЛ, Ротанов СВ, Левин ОС. Современные иммунологические методы исследования ЦСЖ у больных нейросифилисом. Вестник дерматологии и венерологии. 2011;6:49-57]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25208/vdv1087

Arsenyeva VA, Amelina EA, Mardanly SG, Rotanov SV. Linear immune blotting technology for diagnosing syphilis.

Med Alphabet. 2017;18:2:34-7. [Арсеньева ВА, Амелина ЕА, Марданлы СГ, Ротанов СВ. Технология линейного иммунного блоттинга для диагностики сифилиса. Медицинский алфавит. 2017;18:2:34-7]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.7_13303

Marra CM, Maxweil CL, Smith SL, Lukehart S, Rompalo AM, Eaton M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities in patients with syphilis: Association with clinical and laboratory features. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(3):369-76. https://doi.org/10.1086/381227 PMid:14745693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/381227

Gratzer B, Pohl D, Hotton AL. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41(5):285-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000126 PMid:24722379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000126

Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(RR-3):1-137. Published correction appears in: MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(33):924. PMid:26042815

Larsen SA, Hambie EA, Wobig GH, Kennedy EJ. Cerebrospinal fluid serologic test for syphilis: treponemal and nontreponemal tests. In: Morisset R, Kurstak E, editors. Advances in Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Utrecht: VNU Science Press; 1986. p. 157-62.

Kotnik V, Jordan K, Stopincek S, Simcic S, Potocnik M. Intrathecal antitreponemal antibody synthesis determination using the INNO-LIA syphilis score. Acta Dermatovenerol AIp Panonica Adriat. 2007;16(4)135-41. PMid:18204743

Park IU, Fakile YF, Chow JM, Gustafson KJ, Yost H, Shapiro JM, et al. Performance of treponemal tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(6):913-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy558 PMid:29986091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy558

Downloads

Published

2024-06-15

How to Cite

1.
Bondarenko G, Kutova V, Bilokon O, Nikitenko I, Gubenko T, Dasyuk T. Efficiency of Immunoblot While Determination of Antibodies to Treponema Pallidum in Cerebrospinal Fluid. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];12(2):314-8. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/11866

Issue

Section

Infective Diseases

Categories