Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Management: A Systematic Review of Operational Efficiency and Challenges

AI in Healthcare Management

Authors

  • Ina Gjini Mother Teresa University Hospital Center, Tirana, Albania https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3358-1140
  • Besmir Fetahi Mother Teresa University Hospital Center, Tirana, Albania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2025.12096

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, healthcare management, workflow automation, health economics, digital health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in healthcare administration, yet systematic evidence on its impact remains scarce. While most reviews focus on clinical decision-making, the non-clinical management domain—where inefficiencies in resource allocation, workflow, and finance persist—remains understudied.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the role of AI in optimizing healthcare management, to identify implementation barriers, and to propose governance recommendations.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024. Eligible studies addressed AI applications in non-clinical healthcare management. Data were extracted on AI type, application domain, and outcomes. The final inclusion comprised 80 studies.

RESULTS: AI improved operational efficiency (predictive scheduling reduced wait times by 27%), enhanced financial integrity (fraud detection saved $3.2M annually), and optimized supply chains (robotic inventory systems reduced stockouts by 19%). Barriers included ethical risks (15% of triage algorithms exhibited bias) and interoperability challenges.

CONCLUSIONS: This review identifies three major domains of impact (efficiency, finance, ethics), highlights the implementation gap, and introduces a governance checklist for equitable adoption. AI substantially enhances healthcare management operations. However, regulatory oversight, bias audits, and workforce adaptation are essential to ensure equitable and sustainable integration. Future reviews should expand cross-country analysis and empirical evaluations in low-resource settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Topol E. Deep Medicine: How AI Can Make Healthcare Human Again. Basic Books; 2019.

Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present, and future. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(6):e384-e390.

Rajkomar A, Oren E, Chen K, et al. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1

OECD. Health at a Glance 2023. OECD Publishing; 2023.

JAMA. Administrative burden in nursing. JAMA. 2022.

NEJM Catalyst. Predictive staffing. 2023.

BMJ Leader. Perceptions of AI in management. 2024.

Science. Algorithmic bias in triage tools. Science. 2023.

JAMA Health Forum. Automated prior authorization. 2024.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

1.
Gjini I, Fetahi B. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Management: A Systematic Review of Operational Efficiency and Challenges: AI in Healthcare Management. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 15 [cited 2026 May 6];13(4):199-202. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/12096

Issue

Section

Systematic Review Article

Categories