State-of-the-art of Esophagectomy for Cancer: From Open to Laparoscopic and Robotic Technique

Authors

  • Danilo Coco Department of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
  • Silvana Leanza Department of General Surgery, Urbani Hospital, Jesi (Ancona), Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.3811

Keywords:

Esophageal cancer, Robotic, Laparoscopic, Open, Mini-invasive, Ivor-Lewis, Three-field esophagectomy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The results for the meta-analytical review, which contrasted laparoscopic or robotically assisted esophagectomy for cancer against open esophagectomy (OE), indicated feasibility and safety associated with the robotic method.

AIM: The objective of this study is to review the current literature on MIE (Laparo-thoracoscopic and Robotic approach) and open approach and check the state-of-the-art of esophagectomy for cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The comparison of studies which contrasted laparoscopic or robotically assisted esophagectomy for cancer against open esophagectomy (OE).

RESULTS: This review represented the largest sequence of mini-invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to date and the results appear to be comparable to those attained by the traditional open approach. MIE constitutes a safe procedure with a learning curve of around 36 cases.

CONCLUSION: The studies did not reveal variations in mortality and morbidity rate, conversion rate, intensive care unitstay, 1-month mortality, and post-operative complications between the mini-invasive esophagectomy cohort and OE cohort.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

Author Biography

Silvana Leanza , Department of General Surgery, Urbani Hospital, Jesi (Ancona), Italy

  1.  

References

Taurchini M, Cutitta A. Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: State of art. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:125. https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2017.08.23 PMid:29078685

Mu J, Gao S, Mao Y, Xue Q, Yuan Z, Li N, et al. Open three stage transthoracic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e00832. PMid:26576807

Babatunde A, Sun Z, Yang CJ, Gulack BC, Speicher PJ, Adam MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A population-based analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(2):416-23. PMid:27157326

Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, Burdiles P, Korn O, Valladares H. Opentransthoracic or transhiatal versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and esophagectomy survival. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(11):1681-6. PMid:16960662.

Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, Esterman AJ, Bessell JR, Thompson SK, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(3):911-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.060 PMid:19231418

Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina PL, Rosman C, Garcia JR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887-92. https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2012.0122 PMid:22552194

Santos-Sousa HM, Mesquita M, Aral M, Costa-Maia J. Outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A single-center case-control study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34 Suppl 4:171-1. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.171

Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1281-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.095 PMid:26704412

Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, Zhu X, Qin W, Xiang J, et al. Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3873-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4692-x PMid:26659248

Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Shamoun DN, Campos JH. The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: Initial experience. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2285-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9405-7 PMid:17593457

Horgan S, Berger RA, Elli E, Espat NJ. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. Am Surg. 2003;69(7):624-6. PMid:12889629

Boone J, Schipper ME, Moojen WA, Rinkes IH, Cromheecke GJ, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(8):878-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-009-0490-9 PMid:19591168

Weksler B, Sharma P, Moudgill N, Chojnacki KA, Rosato EL. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic mininvasive esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25(5):403-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01246.x PMid:21899652

Okusanya OT, Sarkaria IS, Nicholas R, Nason KS, Sanchez MV, Levy RM, et al. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): The university of Pittsburgh medical center initial experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6(2):179-85. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.03.12 PMid:28447008

Haverkamp L, Seesing MF, Ruurda JP, Boone J, Hillegersberg RV. Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12480 PMid:27001442

Downloads

Published

2020-04-25

How to Cite

1.
Coco D, Leanza S. State-of-the-art of Esophagectomy for Cancer: From Open to Laparoscopic and Robotic Technique. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2020 Apr. 25 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];8(F):27-30. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/3811

Issue

Section

Narrative Review Article

Categories

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.