Farsi Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Psychosocial Impact of Dental Esthetics Questionnaire and Evaluation of its Validity and Reproducibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.4310Keywords:
Quality of life, Malocclusion, Reliability, Validity, Dental esthetics, Young adultsAbstract
AIMS: This study aimed to translate the psychosocial impact of dental esthetics questionnaire (PIDAQ) to Farsi and assess its cultural adaptation, validity, and reproducibility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PIDAQ was translated to Farsi by experts fluent in Farsi and English. It was then back-translated to English by another expert blinded to the original version. The translated version was administered among 40 patients to assess its face validity and content validity. Final version of the questionnaire along with the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) and the perception of occlusion scale (POS) was administered among 400 patients (224 females, 176 males) to assess their need for orthodontic treatment. To assess its validity, the mean score of PIDAQ was evaluated in different ranges of IOTN-esthetic component (IOTN-AC), IOTN-dental health component (DHC), and POS. To assess its convergent validity, the PIDAQ, IOTN-AC, IOTN-DHC, and POS scores were evaluated. Its construct validity was evaluated by confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis. Its internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and the split-half method. Its test-retest reliability was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha was found to be 0.900–0.945 for the questionnaire domains, which showed good reliability. The ICC for the four questionnaire domains was 0.926, which was excellent. IOTN-DHC, IOTN-AC, and POS had significant correlations with the questionnaire domains.
CONCLUSIONS: The Farsi version of PIDAQ has optimal validity and reliability and can be used for assessment of the dental esthetics-related quality of life of Iranian young adults.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Montiel-Company JM, Bellot-Arcis C, Almerich-Silla JM. Validation of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire (PIDAQ) in Spanish adolescents. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(1):e168-73. https://doi.org/10.4317/ medoral.18324 PMid:23229257
Jenny J. A social perspective on need and demand for orthodontic treatment. Int Dent J. 1975;25(4):248-56. PMid:1102458
Mohlin B, Al-Saadi E, Andrup L, Ekblom K. Orthodontics in 12-year old children. Demand, treatment motivating factors and treatment decisions. Swed Dent J. 2002;26(2):89-98. PMid:12462877
Kolawole KA, Ayeni OO, Osiatuma VI. Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics among university undergraduates. Int Orthod. 2012;10(1):96-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2011.12.003 PMid:22269885
Onyeaso CO, Sanu OO. Perception of personal dental appearance in Nigerian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(6):700-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajodo.2003.12.028 PMid:15953895
Seehra J, Fleming PS, Newton T, DiBiase AT. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion,self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod. 2011;38(4):247-56. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653121141641 PMid:22156180
Tsakos G. Combining normative and psychosocial perceptions for assessing orthodontic treatment needs. J Dent Educ. 2008;72(8):876-85. PMid:18676796
O’Brien K, Wright JL, Conboy F, Macfarlane T, Mandall N. The child perception questionnaire is valid for malocclusions in the United Kingdom. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(4):536- 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.10.014 PMid:16627180
Phillips C, Beal KN. Self-concept and the perception of facial appearance in children and adolescents seeking orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(1):12-6. https://doi. org/10.2319/071307-328.1 PMid:19123700
Tajima M, Kohzuki M, Azuma S, Saeki S, Meguro M, Sugawara J. Difference in quality of life according to the severity of malocclusion in Japanese orthodontic patients. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007;212(1):71-80. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.212.71 PMid:17464106
Janosevic P, Stosic M, Janosevic M, Radojicic J, Filipovic G, Cutovic T. Index of orthodontic treatment need in children from the Nis region. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2015;72(1):12-5. https://doi. org/10.2298/vsp1501012j PMid:26043584
Kapoor P, Singh H. Evaluation of esthetic component of the index of orthodontic treatment need: The orthodontists’ perspective. Indian J Dent. 2015;6(4):181-4. https://doi. org/10.4103/0975-962x.170368 PMid:26752877
Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C. Normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment need of a Peruvian university population. Head Face Med. 2006;2:22. https://doi. org/10.1186/1746-160x-2-22 PMid:16884542
Bernabe E, Kresevic VD, Cabrejos SC, Flores-Mir F, Flores- Mir C. Dental esthetic self-perception in young adults with and without previous orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(3):412-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/082506-348.1 PMid:16637720
Cunningham SJ, Garratt AM, Hunt NP. Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial deformity: I. Reliability of the instrument. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000;28(3):195-201. https://doi. org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280305.x PMid:10830646
Cunningham SJ, Garratt AM, Hunt NP. Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial deformity: II. Validity and responsiveness testing. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30(2):81-90. https://doi. org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.300201.x PMid:12000348
Lin H, Quan C, Guo C, Zhou C, Wang Y, Bao B. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(3):354- 60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr136 PMid:22117023
Klages U, Bruckner A, Zentner A. Dental aesthetics, self-awareness, and oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(5):507-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ejo/26.5.507 PMid:15536839
Klages U, Bruckner A, Guld Y, Zentner A. Dental esthetics, orthodontic treatment, and oral-health attitudes in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(4):442-9. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.05.023 PMid:16214625
Klages U, Claus N, Wehrbein H, Zentner A. Development of a questionnaire for assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28(2):103- 11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji083 PMid:16257989
Khan M, Fida M. Assessment of psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18(9):559-64. http://dx.doi.org/09.2008/JCPSP.559564 PMid:18803894
Bucci R, Rongo R, Zito E, Galeotti A, Valletta R, D’Anto V. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire (PIDAQ). Qual Life Res. 2015;24(3):747-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0807-4 PMid:25281009
Afroz S, Rathi S, Rajput G, Rahman SA. Dental esthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self confidence: A campus based survey of north Indian university students. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(4):455-60. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13191-012-0247-1 PMid:24431775
Bourzgui F, Serhier Z, Sebbar M, Diouny S, Othmani MB, Ngom PI. Adaptation and validation of the Moroccan Arabic version of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire (PIDAQ). Saudi Dent J. 2015;27(4):180-6. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.016 PMid:26644752
Sardenberg F, Oliveira AC, Paiva SM, Auad SM, Vale MP. Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(3):270-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq066 PMid:20713456
Spalj S, Lajnert V, Ivankovic L. The psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire--translation and cross-cultural validation in Croatia. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(4):1267-71. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0547-x PMid:24122577
Norusis M. SPSS 13.0 Statistical Procedures Companion. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.; 2005.
Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 4th ed. New York: McGraw- Hill; 2010.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572 PMid:9055718
Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284-90. https://doi. org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Amin Golshah , Haddis Esfandeyari , Nafiseh Nikkerdar, Mohammad Moslem Imani , Mohsen Safaei , Roohollah Sharifi , Hamid Reza Mozaffari , Hedaiat Moradpoor (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Funding data
-
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
Grant numbers 96037