School-based Smoking Prevention in Adolescents in Developing Countries: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.4336Keywords:
Smoking, IndonesiaAbstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of diseases due to tobacco consumption has increased, especially in developing countries, where around 90% of smokers start consuming tobacco before the age of 18 years. School-based smoking prevention programs can prevent smoking among adolescents. This program is often implemented in developing countries because it is considered cost-effective, and the results are promising. At present, the school-based smoking prevention program is expanding with many methods.
AIM: This study aims to describe the various types of school-based smoking prevention interventions in developing countries.
METHODS: This research applied a literature review approach with the process of collecting data through the Science Direct, ProQuest, EBSCO, and NCBI databases. Search literature was by keyword “smoking AND prevention AND school-based AND adolescent AND randomized controlled trials or randomized controlled trials.” Inclusion criteria used for data collection were studies on school-based smoking prevention interventions, full text, and journal publishing from 2015 to 2019, using English. The research conducted in developing countries and prevention interventions was not only for smoking in the traditional way but also in the form of other than the consumption of tobacco such as cigars, smokeless tobacco, and hookah or shisha. Exclusion criteria in this review were publication articles not in the form of original publications such as letters to editors, only abstracts, and books.
RESULTS: The literature search results found 594 journals with details of 99 Science direct journals, ProQuest 385 journals, NCBI 85 journals, and 25 EBSCO journals. The entire database belongs to the inclusion criteria and only seven articles meet the requirements. The results of the analysis revealed that interventions conducted in school-based smoking prevention programs for adolescents in developing countries included the application of the anti-smoking curriculum, behavior change intervention (BCI), and peer education.
CONCLUSION: Interventions considered useful for preventing smoking in adolescents are the anti-smoking curriculum, BCI, and peer education.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Xi B, Liang Y, Liu Y, Yan Y. Tobacco use and second-hand smoke exposure in young adolescents aged 12-15 years: Data from 68 low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(11):e795-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/ s2214-109x(16)30187-5 PMid:27697484
Sohn K. Relationship of smoking to hypertension in a developing country. Glob Heart. 2018;13(4):285-92. PMid:29803603
Boyle P, Gray N, Henningfield J, Seffrin J, Witold Z. Tobacco: Science, Policy, and Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199566655.001.0001
Weitzman M, Yusufali AH, Bali F, Vilcassim MJ, Gandhi S, Peltier R, et al. Effects of hookah smoking on indoor air quality in homes. Tob Control. 2016;26(5):586-91. https://doi.org/10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2016-053165 PMid:27798320
Rathor K, Lenka S, Dharmashree S, Naik D, Varu R. Global tobacco control. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2018;9(12):2458- 64. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.02137.x
AL-Bashaireh AM, Haddad LG, Weaver M, Kelly DL, Chengguo X, Yoon S. The effect of tobacco smoking on musculoskeletal health: A systematic review. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018:4184190. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4184190 PMid:30112011
Nurumal MS, Zain SH, Mohamed MH, Shorey S. Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention education program (SPEP) among nonsmoking adolescents: A quasi-experimental study. J Sch Nurs. 2019;20(10):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840519871641 PMid:31455149
Ho SY, Chen J, Liung LT, Mok HY, Wang LJ. Adolescent smoking in Hong Kong: Prevalence, psychosocial correlates, and prevention. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(6S):19-27. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.003 PMid:31122545
Golechha M. Health promotion methods for smoking prevention and cessation: A comprehensive review of effectiveness and the way forward. Int J Prev Med. 2016;7:7. https://doi. org/10.4103/2008-7802.173797 PMid:26941908
Nishio A, Saito J, Tomokawa S, Kobayashi J, Makino Y, Akiyama T, et al. Systematic review of school tobacco prevention programs in African countries from 2000 to 2016. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192489. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0192489 PMid:29408895
Thomas RE, McLellan J, Perera R. Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006976. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006976 PMid:25757946
Christmals D, Gross J. An integrative literature review framework for postgraduate nursing research reviews. J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(1):7-15.
Aveyard H. Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care. United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. p. 210.
Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Business Res. 2019;104:333-9.
Tahlil T, Woodman RJ, Coveney J, Ward PR. Six-months follow-up of a cluster-randomized trial of school-based smoking prevention education programs in Aceh, Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1088. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12889-015-2428-4 PMid:26499860
Yu S, Galimov A, Sussman S, Jeong GC, Shin SR. Three-month effects of project EX: A smoking intervention pilot program with Korean adolescents. Addict Behav Rep. 2019;9:100152. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100152 PMid:31193802
Nakkash R, Lotfi T, Bteddini D, Haddad P, Najm H, Jbara L, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a theory-informed school-based intervention to prevent waterpipe tobacco smoking: Changes in knowledge, attitude, and behaviors in 6th and 7th graders in Lebanon. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):E1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091839 PMid:30149668
Hussain A, Zaheer S, Shafique K. School-based behavioral intervention to reduce the habit of smokeless tobacco and betel quid use in high-risk youth in Karachi: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206919. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0206919 PMid:30388182
Nădăşan V, Foley KL, Pénzes M, Paulik E, Ștefan M, Ábrám Z, et al. The short-term effects of ASPIRA: A web-based, multimedia smoking prevention program for adolescents in Romania: A randomized cluster trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19(8):908-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw308 PMid:27838661
Bast LS, Due P, Lauemøller SG, Kjær NT, Christiansen T, Andersen A. Study protocol of the X:IT II-a school-based smoking preventive intervention. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):497. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6805-2
López EV, Rey-Reñones C, Rodriguez-Blanco T, Grau CF, Arija V, Uriarte ML, et al. Efficacy of a smoking prevention programme in Catalan secondary schools: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in Spain. Addiction. 2015;110(5):852-60. https:// doi.org/10.1111/add.12833 PMid:25515936
Peirson L, Ali MU, Kenny M, Raina P, Sherifali D. Interventions for prevention and treatment of tobacco smoking in school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2016;85:20-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ypmed.2015.12.004 PMid:26743631
Campbell KA, Fergie L, Coleman-Haynes T, Cooper S, Lorencatto F, Ussher M, et al. Improving behavioral support for smoking cessation in pregnancy: What are the barriers to stopping and which behavior change techniques can influence these? Application of theoretical domains framework. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):E359. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph15020359 PMid:29462994
Bull ER, McCleary N, Li X, Dombrowski SU, Dusseldorp E, Johnston M. Interventions to promote healthy eating, physical activity and smoking in low-income groups: A systematic review with meta-analysis of behavior change techniques and delivery/ context. Int J Behav Med. 2018;25(6):605-16. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12529-018-9734-z PMid:30003476
Springer AE, Harrell MB, Gomensoro LM, Fresco MT, Rogers S, Florines M, et al. ¡Activate Ya? Co-learning about school-based tobacco prevention and physical activity promotion in secondary school students in Uruguay. Glob Health Promot. 2019;1757- 9759:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975918813049 PMid:30943128
Dherani M, Zehra SN, Jackson C, Satyanaryana V, Huque R, Chandra P, et al. Behaviour change interventions to reduce second-hand smoke exposure at home in pregnant women-a systematic review and intervention appraisal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):378. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12884-017-1562-7 PMid:29137602
Khayyati F, Jafarabadi MA, Lotfizadeh M, Karimi A, Rahmani K. Effectiveness of a community and school-based intervention to control and prevent of tobacco use in adolescents: A field randomized controlled trial. Iran J Public Health. 2019;48(1):187- 8. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i1.812 PMid:30847332
Georgie JM, Sean H, Deborah MC, Matthew H, Rona C. Peer-led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11-21 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2016;111(3):391-407. https://doi. org/10.1111/add.13224 PMid:26518976
Ayaz S, Açıl D. Comparison of peer education and the classic training method for school-aged children regarding smoking and its dangers. J Pediatr Nurs. 2015;30(3):e3-12. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pedn.2014.11.009 PMid:25613544
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Titih Huriah, Vina Dwi Lestari (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
