Value of Adding Cisternostomy to Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma Patients

Authors

  • Omar Youssef Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Taher M. Ali Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Khaled Anbar Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Osama El-Shahawy Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Abdelrhman Enayet Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.4423

Keywords:

Cisternostomy, Decompressive craniotomy, Traumatic patients

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical evacuation of acute subdural hematoma has remained the mainstay of the treatment for acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) in patients with progressive neurological deficits, increasing intracranial pressure (ICP), or significant mass effect. Cisternostomy entails opening the basal cisterns aiming to their opening to atmospheric pressure and therefore reducing the intraparenchymal pressure.

AIM: We aimed to evaluate value of adding cisternostomy to decompressive craniotomy on outcome of traumatic ASDH patients.

METHODS: Prospective study included 40 patients who presented to Cairo University hospital emergency department with traumatic acute subdural hematoma in the period between January 2018 and June 2019 and matching our inclusion criteria: Age from 12 to 65 years, traumatic acute subdural hematoma with thickness ≥ 10 mm or midline shift ≥ 5 mm, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on admission < 10, with no associated intraparenchymal hematoma ≥ 1 cm or severe comorbidities. Patients were randomized into one of two groups according to their order of coming. The first group patients were operated on by decompressive craniotomy (DHC) plus cisternostomy and the second group was operated on by decompressive craniotomy only. Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was used for outcome assessment.

RESULTS: Outcome was better 2nd but not statistically significant – in the first group (DHC+ cisternostomy) in terms of mortality: 7/20 patients (35%) (p = 0.337) and median GOS: 3 (p = 0.337), compared to the second group (DHC only) in which mortality occurred in 10/20 (50%) and median GOS was 1. Adding cisternostomy to decompressive craniotomy increased surgery time with 35.5 minutes in average. In our study, older age and lower GCS on admission had significantly worse outcome.

CONCLUSION: Adding cisternostomy to decompressive craniotomy in traumatic patients had better 2nd but not statistically significant outcome. Whether it should replace the routine decompressive craniotomy in these cases or not needs further larger clinical trials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Li LM, Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR, Timofeev I, Corteen EA, Pickard JD, et al. Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: A comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(9):1555-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1428-8 PMid:22752713

Chi JH. Craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: Results from the DECRA trial. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(6):N19-20. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000398210.58112.7e PMid:21778945

Cherian I, Bernardo A, Grasso G. Cisternostomy for traumatic brain injury: Pathophysiological mechanisms and surgical technical notes. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:51-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.072 PMid:26851743

Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(147):147ra111. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 PMid:22896675

Chan YH. Biostatistics 102: Quantitative data parametric and non-parametric tests. Singapore Med J. 2003;44(8):391-6. PMid:14700417

Chan YH. Biostatistics 202: Logistic regression analysis. Singapore Med J. 2004;45(4):149-53. PMid:15094982

Cherian I, Yi G, Munakomi S. Cisternostomy: Replacing the age old decompressive hemicraniectomy? Asian J Neurosurg. 2013;8(3):132-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.121684 PMid:24403955

Hasselberger K. Prognosis after acute subdural and epidural hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;90(3-4):111-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01560563 PMid:3354356

Rush B, Rousseau J, Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE. Craniotomy versus craniectomy for acute traumatic subdural hematoma in the United States: A national retrospective cohort analysis. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.034 PMid:26748175

Koç RK, Akdemir H, Oktem IS, Meral M, Menkü A. Acute subdural hematoma: Outcome and outcome prediction. Neurosurg Rev. 1997;20(4):239-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01105894 PMid:9457718

Downloads

Published

2020-07-31

How to Cite

1.
Youssef O, Ali TM, Anbar K, El-Shahawy O, Enayet A. Value of Adding Cisternostomy to Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma Patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2020 Jul. 31 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];8(B):1014-22. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/4423

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.