Surface Roughness of Bulk Fill Composite after Simulated Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices

Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby; Mahmoud Darwish; Yasser R. Souror; Ahmed Waly

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2020.4622

Authors

Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi College for Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadh, KSA; Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt
Mahmoud Darwish Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi College for Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
Yasser R. Souror Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Assiute. Egypt; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, KSA
Ahmed Waly Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Assiute. Egypt; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, AlFarabi Dental College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.4622

Keywords:

Bulk-fill composite, Dentifrices, Surface roughness, Toothbrushing

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the current in vitro study was to evaluate the changes in surface roughness of bulk fill composites after simulated toothbrushing with different dentifrices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of bulk fill resin composites were used in this study; 27 specimens of each composite resin were randomly divided into three main groups (n = 9). Each main group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 3). Each group was subjected to simulated toothbrushing with three different dentifrices. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effect of brushing using dentifrices on the surface roughness of each type of composite resin, followed by Tukey’s test at a significance level of p ≤ 0.5%.

RESULTS: Results revealed that different effects on composite surface roughness were detected after simulating toothbrushing with different dentifrices. Lacalut toothpaste abrades more with Filtek Bulk Fill, Tetric N-Ceram then Bulk Fill SDR. Crest 3D toothpaste abrades more with Tetric N-Ceram, Bulk Fill SDR then Filtek Bulk Fill. BlanX toothpaste abrades more with Tetric N-Ceram, Bulk Fill SDR then Filtek Bulk Fill.

CONCLUSION: Chemical composition of both resin composites and dentifrices plays an important role in influencing the degree of surface roughness of bulk fill composite resin restorations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

Author Biography

Ahmed Waly, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Assiute. Egypt; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, AlFarabi Dental College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Dental Intern At Al farabi College for Dentistry and Nursing

References

Nash RW, Lowe RA, Leinfelder K. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(8):1099- 104. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0334 PMid:11575016

Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM. Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nano-filled resin-based composite. J Dent. 2008;36(3):186-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jdent.2007.11.015 PMid:18237839

Ali S, Iqbal K, Asmat M, Farooq I, Khan AM, Alam MK. Dental resin composite restoration practices amongst general dental practitioners of Karachi, Pakistan. World J Dent. 2019;10(2):129- 134. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1618

Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42(4):439-49. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.005 PMid:24480086

Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behavior of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(4):427-38. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00784-009-0258-4 PMid:19242739

Abouelleil H, Pradelle N, Villat C, Attik N, Colon P, Grosgogeat B. Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(4):262-70. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.262 PMid:26587411

Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012;40(6):500-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jdent.2012.02.015 PMid:22390980

Walter R. Critical appraisal: Bulk-fill flowable composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(1):72-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jerd.12011 PMid:23374413

Farooq I, Ali S, Siddiqui IA, Al-Khalifa KS, Al-Hariri M. Influence of thymoquinone exposure on the micro-hardness of dental enamel an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2019;13(3):318-22. https:// doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697117 PMid:31618784

Alfaroukh R, Elembaby A, Almas K, Ali S. Oral Biofilm formation and retention on commonly used dental materials: An update. Trop Dent J. 2018;41(164):28-34.

Momoi Y, Hirosaki K, Kohno A, McCabe JF. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater. 1997;13(2):82-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0109-5641(97)80016-4 PMid:9467309

Krejci I, Lutz F, Boretti R. Resin composite polishing filling the gaps. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(7):490-5. PMid:10635262

Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent. 2004;17(4):262-6. PMid:15478488

Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent. 1997;22(6):260-5. PMid:9610323

Garcia FC, Wang L, D’Alpino PH, Souza JB, Araujo PA, Mondelli RF. Evaluation of the roughness and mass loss of the flowable composites after simulated tooth brushing abrasion. Braz Oral Res. 2004;18(2):156-61. https://doi.org/10.1590/ s1806-83242004000200012

Yap AU, Wu SS, Chelvan S, Tan ES. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2005;30(1):99-104. PMid:15765964

Farooq I, Ali S, Al-Khalifa KS, Alhooshani K. Total and soluble fluoride concentration present in various commercial brands of children toothpastes available in Saudi Arabia a pilot study. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30(2):161-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sdentj.2018.01.001 PMid:29628740

Teixeira EC, Thompson JL, Piascik JR, Thompson JY. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of two restorative composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(3):172-80. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00109.x PMid:15996389

Amaral CM, Rodrigues JA, Erhardt MC, Araujo MW, Marchi GM, Heymann HO, et al. Effect of whitening dentifrices on the superficial roughness of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(2):102-8. https://doi. org/10.2310/6130.2006.00017_1.x PMid:16519874

Cury JA, Rosing CK, Tenuta LM. Are dentifrices all the same? Int J Braz Dent. 2010;6:254-6.

Wiegand A, Schlueter N. The role of oral hygiene: Does tooth brushing harm? Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:215-9. PMid:24993269

Kodaka T, Kuroiwa M, Kuroiwa M, Okumura J, Mori R, Hirasawa S, et al. Effects of brushing with a dentifrice for sensitive teeth on tubule occlusion and abrasion of dentin. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 2001;50(1):57-64. https://doi. org/10.1093/jmicro/50.1.57 PMid:11291961

De Menezes M, Turssi CP, Hara AT, Messias DC, Serra MC. Abrasion of eroded root dentine brushed with different toothpastes. Clin Oral Investig. 2004;8(3):151-5. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00784-004-0262-7 PMid:15146320

Liljeborg A, Tellefsen G, Johannsen G. The use of a profilometer for both quantitative and qualitative measurements of toothpaste abrasivity. Int J Dent Hyg. 2010;8(3):237-43. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2009.00433.x PMid:20624195

Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: An in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1994;10:353-62. https://doi. org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90059-0 PMid:7498599

Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.04.012 PMid:16872928

Janda R, Roulet JF, Kaminsky M, Steffi n G, Latta M. Color stability of resin matrix restorative materials as a function of the method of light activation. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:280-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00125.x PMid:15154928

Wang L, Garcia FC, de Araujo PA, Franco EB, Mondelli RF. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated tooth brushing test. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(5):303-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00058.x PMid:15726799

Moraes RR, Ddos SR, Klumb MM, Brandt WC, Correr- Sobrinho L, Bueno M. In vitro tooth brushing abrasion of dental resin composites: Packable, microhybrid, nanohybrid and microfilled materials. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22(2):112-8. https:// doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242008000200004 PMid:18622479

Oliveira GU, Mondelli RF, Charantola Rodrigues M, Franco EB, Ishikiriama SK, et al. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated tooth brushing. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(5):510-6. https://doi. org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000500003 PMid:23138735

Turssi CP, Hara AT, de Magalhaes CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr. Influence of storage regime prior to abrasion on surface topography of restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;65(2):227-32. https://doi. org/10.1002/jbm.b.10005 PMid:12687714

Suzuki T, Kyoizumi H, Araki Y, Finger WJ, Kanehira M. Toothbrush abrasion of resin composites with different filler concepts. World J Dent. 2012;3(2):184-93. https://doi. org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1154

Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(10):1382-90. PMid:14620019

Turssi CP, de Magalhaes CS, Serra MC, Junior AL. Surface roughness assessment of resin-based materials during brushing preceded by pH-cycling simulations. Oper Dent. 2001;26(6):576-84. PMid:11699181

Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13(4):258-69. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80038-3 PMid:11696906

Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(1):1- 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb01765. PMid:7706534

Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J. 2004;195(1):42-5. PMid:14966503

Kanter J, Koski RE, Martin D. The relationship of weight loss to surface roughness of composite resins from simulated toothbrushing. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;47(5):505-13. https://doi. org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90300-6 PMid:6211543

Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(4):386-95. https:// doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114267 PMid:11319537