Behavior-Based Safety Model Development in the Workplace Based on Religiosity and Psychological Condition of Workers at PT. Semen Tonasa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.4630Keywords:
Religiosity, Psychological condition, Safety culture and behavior-based safetyAbstract
BACKGROUND: Awareness of safety is still very low and that is an unfavorable behavior toward safety. It certainly leads to the high number of accidents in the workplace, especially in the mining sector.
AIM: The research objective was to develop a model of behavior-based safety in the workplace based on religiosity and psychological conditions of labors at PT. Semen Tonasa.
METHODS: The method of the study used in this research was cross-sectional design that was explanatory research, based on the perception of the respondents. The research variables were exogenous variable, namely, religiosity, intervening variables: Psychological condition, knowledge, and attitudes, and safety culture and endogenous variable: Behavior-based safety practices. Data analysis test used path analysis by structural equation modeling.
RESULTS: This study had found empirically that behavior-based safety was affected by religiosity factor through three paths, namely, the variables of psychological condition, safety culture, and religiosity of the workers. Thus, the development of the model refers to workers’ religiosity, psychological condition, and safety culture. The implementation of behaviorbased safety in the workplace must be initiated from the top management to the workers at the bottom. Internalization of religious values should be started from the individual level to the top management level.
CONCLUSION: This internalization can be implemented through the continuous training and strict supervision. To facilitate the implementation of behavior-based safety, the company is recommended required to make religious cooperate management or spirituality cooperate management which is aligned with other organizational structures in PT Semen Tonasa so that the implementation of religious values is not partially but systemically internalized in PT. Semen Tonasa.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Martínez-Córcoles M, Gracia F, Tomas I, Peiró JM. Leadership and employees’ perceived safety behaviours in a nuclear power plant: A structural equation model. Saf Sci 2011;49:1118-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.03.002
Bodroastuti AG. Pengaruh Faktor Budaya, Sosial, Pribadi Dan Psikologi Terhadap Perilaku Konsumen (Studi Pada Pembelian Rumah Di Perumahan Griya Utama Banjardowo Semarang). Indonesia: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Manggala; 2001. https://doi.org/10.9744/duts.4.1.40-47
dan Jusuf Mudzakir AM. Nuansa-nuansa Psikologi Islam. Jakarta: Grapindo Persada; 2002.
Ismirani M. Pengaruh Religiusitas dan adversity Question Terhadap Stress Kerja pada agen Jiwa Bersama Bumiputera 1912. Indonesia: Sikripsi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta; 2011. https://doi. org/10.46899/jeps.v3i1.152
Krisnaldi A. Evaluasi Budaya Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja Pada Kegiatan, Thesis. Berlin: ITB; 2008.
Fernández-Muniz B, Montes-Peón JM, Vázquez-Ordás CJ. Safety climate in OHSAS 18001-certified organisations: Antecedents and consequences of safety behavior. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;45(2012):745-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aap.2011.10.002 PMid:22269566
Patria B. Bagaimana Behavioral Safety Mengurangi Angka Kecelakaan Kerja; 2007. Available from: http://www.inparametric. com/bhinablog/behavior/bagaimana-behaviouralsafety-mengurangi-angka-kecelakaan-kerja. [Last accessed on 2011 Sep 20]. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/r2khm
Siagian SP. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara; 2008.
Firmansyah FI. Analisis Pengaruh Tingkat Religiusitas Pasien Terhadap Keputusan Menggunakan Jasa Kesehatan (Studi Pada Pasien RSU PKU Muhammadiyah Roemani Semarang). Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro; 2010. https://doi.org/10.37339/e-bis.v3i1.205
Brow TA, Littvay L, Sautter AC, Bearnes B. Ethics and personality: Emphaty and narcissism as moderator of ethical decision making in business students. J Educ Bus. 2010;85:203-8.
Kerja DT. Training Material Bidang Kesehatan Kerja. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Tenaga Kerja; 1998. https://doi. org/10.31219/osf.io/23mkn
Geller ES. The Psychology of Safety Handbook. USA: CRC Press LLC; 2001.
Dewi C. Perepsi dan Perilaku Petugas Paramedis dan Non Medis Dalam Penerapan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) di RSUD Sleman, S2 Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat (Manajemen Rumah Sakit UGM). Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2006. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/vk2uf
Saputra AE. Faktor-faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Perilaku Aman Pengemudi Dump Truck PT.X Districk MTBU Tanjung Enim Sumatera Selatan. Indonesia: Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia; 2008. https://doi.org/10.33221/jikm. v5i1.314
Siska O. Pengaruh Faktor Psikologis Terhadap Perilaku Konsumen Pada PT. Indonesia: Bank Muamalat Indonesia Cabang Pekanbaru, Universitas Andalas; 2009.
Siti A. Hubungan Antara Tingkat Pengetahuan Dengan Perilaku Pola Makan Sehat Pada Mahasiswa Kost di Kelurahan Tembalang Kecamatan Tembalang Kota Semarang, Undergraduate Thesis. Indonesia: Diponegoro University; 2007. https://doi.org/10.22435/mpk.v26i2.4163.85-92
Dahlawy AD. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) di Area Pengolahan PT. Jakarta: Antam Tbk, Unit Bisnis Pertambangan Emas Pongkor Kabupaten Bogor, Program Studi Kesehatan Masyarakat Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Islam Negeri Syarid Hidayatullah Jakarta; 2008. https://doi. org/10.38165/jk.v6i2.148
Wydiyanti. Subjective well-being individu dewasa madya. J Psikol. 2007;20(2):517.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Atjo Wahyu, Tjipto Suwandi, Hari Basuki, Anwar Mallongi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
