Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Techniques on Surface Roughness of Two Universal Nanohybrid Composite Resins

Authors

  • Ebaa Alagha Department of Operative Dentistry, Al-Farabi Private Colleges, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Waad Alotaibi Dental Intern students, Al-Farabi Private Colleges, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Maha Maghrbil Dental Intern students, Al-Farabi Private Colleges, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Laila Hakami Dental Intern students, Al-Farabi Private Colleges, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Maram Alrashedi Dental Intern students, Al-Farabi Private Colleges, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.4926

Keywords:

Surface roughness, Nanohybrid composite resin, SEM

Abstract

AIM: This study investigated the effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness of two types of universal nanohybrid composite resins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 40 samples will be prepared to form two main equal groups of specimens (n = 20), according to the composite resin materials. Two universal nanohybrid resin composites were used in this study. First group (A1) is a universal nanohybrid composite resin (Mosaic) and the second group (A2) is a universal nanohybrid composite resin (Harmonize). Each group was subdivided equally into four equal subgroups (n = 5), according to the used finishing and polishing systems. Mold was made to prepare the specimens with a central hole of 4 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness. Light curing tip was placed touching the glass slab for 20 s then the cured specimens were removed from the mold and the specimens immediately and immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using light sectioning vision system. SEM was done to support the results.

RESULTS: The results showed that the lowest (Ra) values were recorded by the specimens under Myler strip followed by Polishing Discs treated specimens followed by Diacomp Plus specimens and the highest (Ra) values were recorded by white polishing stone specimens and regardless to finishing or polishing, it was found that mosaic resin composites group recorded statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower roughness mean value than Harmonize resin composites group. p ≤ 0.05 is statistically significant in all tests.

CONCLUSION: Achieving long-lasting esthetics in resin composites restorations needs special attention for obtaining optimal resin polymerization and a perfect surface finish using the appropriate finishing and polishing system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Ramos R, Chinelatti M, Chimello D, Dibb R. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(6):450-6.

Ferracane J. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater. 2005;21(1):36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dental.2004.10.004 PMid:15681000

Anusavice K. Philips’ Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA, United States: Saunders; 2003.

Bowen RL. Dental filling material compressing vinyl silane treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of bisphenol and glycidyl methacrylate. US Pat. 1962;3(66):112.

Leinfelder K. Posterior composite resins: The materials and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126(5):663-4, 667-8, 671-2. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0247 PMid:7759692

Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(5):265-75. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00116.x PMid:17877626

Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes JC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Oper Dent. 2006;31(4):409- 17. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-103 PMid:16924980

Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent. 2008;33(1):44-50. https://doi. org/10.2341/07-28 PMid:18335732

Morgan M. Finishing and polishing procedures of direct posterior resin restorations Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004;16(3):211-7. PMid:15199696

Halim N, Maria T, Haline D, Fernanda P. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J. 2003;14(1):37-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/ s0103-64402003000100007 PMid:12656463

Farahat F, Daneshkazemi A, Hajiahmadi Z. The effect of bulk depth and irradiation time on the surface hardness and degree of cure of bulk-fill composites. J Dent Biomater. 2016;3(3):284-91. PMid:28959755

Delgado A, Ritter A, Donovan T, Ziemiecki T, Heymann H. Effect of finishing techniques on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(4):184-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jerd.12140 PMid:26177046

Suzuki T, Kyoizumi H, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Endo T, Utterodt A, et al. Resistance of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites to toothbrush abrasion with calcium carbonate slurry. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(6):708-16. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.708 PMid:20019422

Lemos C, Mauro S, Dos Santos P, Briso A, Fagundes T. Influence of mechanical and chemical degradation in the surface roughness, gloss, and color of microhybrid composites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(4):283-8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2032 PMid:28349905

Kumari C, Bhat K, Bansal R. Evaluation of surface roughness of different restorative composites after polishing using atomic force microscopy. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(1):56-62. https:// doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173200 PMid:26957795

Marco C, Lodovico V, Riccardo B, Ricaldone F, Marco C, Claudio P. Effect of different finishing/polishing procedures on surface roughness of ormocer-based and different resin composites. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018;15(6):404-10. https:// doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.245232 PMid:30534168

Kemaloglu H, Karacolak G, Turkun LS. Can reduced-step polishers be as effective as multiple-step polishers in enhancing surface smoothness. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(1):31-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12233 PMid:27393008

Barghi N, Lind SD. A guide to polishing direct composite resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21(2):138-42, 144. PMid:11199694

Shayan M, Jung Y, Huang PS, Moradi M, Plakseychuk A, Lee J, et al. Improved osteoblast response to UV-irradiated PMMA/ TiO2 nanocomposites with controllable wettability. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25(12):2721-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10856-014-5284-3 PMid:25074833

Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent. 2007;32(1):45-52. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-9 PMid:17288328

Scheibe K, Almeida K, Medeiros I, Costa J, Alves C. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(1):21-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572009000100005 PMid:19148401

Kumar R, Kulashekar B, Dhanasekar B, Raamamoorthy B. Application of digital image magnification for the surface roughness evaluation using machine vision. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2005;45(2):228-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijmachtools.2004.07.001

Joniot S, Salomon J, Dejou J, Gregoire G. The use of two surface analyzers to evaluate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing. Oper Dent. 2006;31(1):39- 46. https://doi.org/10.2341/04-166 PMid:16536192

Kerr Restorative-Harmonize Universal Composite; 2020. Available from: http://www.kerrdental.com. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 20].

Eden E, Cogulu D, Attin T. The effect of finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness, microhardness and microleakage of a nanohybrid composite. J Int Dent Med Res. 2012;5(3):155-60.

Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren M, Ozsoy A, Topcu F. Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials. J Dent Sci. 2013;8(2):160-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jds.2012.05.007

Roeder L, Tate W, Powers J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent. 2000;25(6):534-43. PMid:11203867

Marigo L, Rizzi M, La Torre G, Rumi G. 3-D surface profile analysis: Different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent. 2001;26(6):562-8. PMid:11699179

Endo T, Finger W, Kanehira M, Utterodt A, Komatsu M. Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2010;29(2):213-23. https://doi. org/10.4012/dmj.2009-019 PMid:20379033

Uçtaşli M, Arisu H, Omürlü H, Eligüzeloğlu E, Ozcan S, Ergun G. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8(2):89-96. https://doi.org/10.5005/ jcdp-8-2-89 PMid:17277831

Ferracane JL. Resin composite state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020 PMid:21093034

Komalsingsakul A, Klaophimai A, Srisatjaluk RL, Senawongse P. Effect of the surface roughness of composite resins on the water contact angle and biofilm formation. M Dent J. 2019;39(2):75-84.

Restorative-Mosaic Composite Resin; 2020. Available from: http:// www.ultradent.com. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 20].

Abdurazaq M, Al-Khafaji A. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness of new low polymerized composite materials-an in vitro study. J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2013;25(2):24-30. https://doi.org/10.12816/0014927

Giacomelli L, Derchi G, Frustaci A, Orlando B, Covani U, Barone A, et al. Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: An analysis with atomic force microscopy. Open Dent J. 2010;4:191-4. https://doi. org/10.2174/1874210601004010191 PMid:21228920

Yazici A, Tuncer D, Antonson S, Onen A, Kilinic E. Effect of delayed finishing and polishing on surface roughness, hardness, and gloss of tooth colored restorative materials. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(1):50-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697808 PMid:20046480

El Tabbakh A, Fayed T, Nouman K. In vitro study of the effect of some finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness of various resin composites. Al Azhar J Dent Sci. 2005;6:60-9.

Borges A, Pagani C, Rodrigues J. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(1):42-8. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00451.x PMid:15259542

Helena S, Luiza R, Fidela M, Benoni O. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins. Braz Dent J. 2005;16(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/ s0103-64402005000100007 PMid:16113932

Nashaat M, Mohamed Z, Hamod H, Mubarak D, Abdullah S. Evaluation of surface roughness of different direct resin-based composites. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(3):104-9. PMid:28584779

Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012;40(2):e64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.005 PMid:22819955

Fawad N. Effect of different polishing procedures on color stability of nanocomposites in different mouth rinses. Restor Dent. 2013;4(2):172-9.

Neme A, Frazier K, Roeder L, Debner T. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2003;27(1):50-8. PMid:11817469

Herrgott A, Ziemiecki T, Dennison J. An evaluation of different composite resin systems finished with various abrasives. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;119(6):729-32. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada. archive.1989.0266 PMid:2592699

Yap A, Yap S, Teo C, Ng J. Finishing/polishing of resin composite and compomer restoratives: Effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2004;29(3):275-9. PMid:15195727

Mitra S, Wu D, Holmes B. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(10):1382-90. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada. archive.2003.0054 PMid:14620019

Eldin SS, El-Yassaky M, El-Sharkawy D. Color stability of resin composites of different filler size polished with two different polishing techniques. Al Azhar J Dent Sci. 2011;5:40-9.

Sibel A, Yazici A, Kilinc E, Antonson D, Hardigan P. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent. 2011;39(1):e9-17. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.006 PMid:21256180

Jung M. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic. Oper Dent. 2002;27(2):175-83. PMid:11931137

Schmidlin P, Sener B, Lutz F. Cleaning and polishing efficacy of abrasive-bristle brushes and a prophylaxis paste on resin composite material in vitro. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(9):691-9 PMid:12666895

Venturini D, Cenci M, Demarco F, Camacho G, Powers J. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2006;31(1):11-7. https://doi.org/10.2341/04-155 PMid:16536188

Ryba T, Dunn W, Murchison D. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent. 2002;27(3):243-7. PMid:12022454

Downloads

Published

2020-10-10

How to Cite

1.
Alagha E, Alotaibi W, Maghrbil M, Hakami L, Alrashedi M. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Techniques on Surface Roughness of Two Universal Nanohybrid Composite Resins. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2020 Oct. 10 [cited 2021 Dec. 4];8(D):182-8. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/4926

Issue

Section

Prosthodontics

Categories