Ethical and Medicolegal Considerations in the Termination of Pregnancy Due to Lethal Congenital Anomalies in Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Taufik Suryadi; Kumalasari Kumalasari; Kulsum Kulsum

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2020.5085

Authors

Taufik Suryadi Department of Forensic Medicine and Medicolegal, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia; Researcher and Lecturer of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Kumalasari Kumalasari Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Kulsum Kulsum Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.5085

Keywords:

Clinical ethics, Congenital anomalies, Medicolegal, Termination of pregnancy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the following paper is to present the case termination of pregnancy indicated by lethal congenital anomalies based on ethical and medicolegal consideration. The method used to resolve this ethical dilemma is based on clinical ethics theory with systematic consideration of medical indications, patient preferences, quality of life, and contextual features. Medicolegal considerations were also take-into account based on Indonesian Law number 36 of 2009.

CASE REPORT: This case report shows the termination of pregnancy in a 26-year-old patient with 25–26 weeks’ gestational age. Unfortunately, the patients are referred too late, so because of limited facilities in the rural area, the presence of congenital abnormalities in the fetus is not detected early in the 1^stweek of pregnancy. The results of obstetric ultrasonography showed multiple congenital anomalies. The ethical dilemma faced by obstetricians is whether to terminate the pregnancy now or after the fetus has reached term gestational age?

RESULTS: The results of ethical and medicolegal considerations in this case were carried out comprehensively by producing a joint decision between the team of doctors, the patient, and her families. The decision was made after providing adequate information regarding medical indications while taking into account the patient’s viewpoint (patient preference), quality of life, and also contextual features.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Phadke SR, Agarwal M, Aggarwal S. Late termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormalities: The perspective of Indian lay persons and medical practitioners. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(13):1286-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2887 PMid:22030841

Kamranpour B, Noroozi M, Bahrami M. The needs of women who have experienced pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies: A literature review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019;24(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_80_18 PMid:30622571

Chima SC, Mamdoo F. Ethical and legal dilemmas around termination of pregnancy for severe fetal anomalies: A review of two African neonates presenting with ventriculomegaly and holoprosencephaly. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18:S31-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.170820

Payot A. Termination of pregnancy and perinatal palliative care in the case of fetal anomaly: Why is there so much incoherence? In: Verhagen E, Janvier A, editors. Ethical Dilemmas for Critically Ill Babies. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2016. p. 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7360-7_6

Barnett CP. Congenital abnormalities: Prenatal diagnosis and screening. In: Khong TY, Malcomson RD, editors. Keeling’s Fetal and Neonatal Pathology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 183-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19207-9_8

Prata N, Sreenivas A, Vahidnia F, Potts M. Saving maternal lives in resource-poor settings: Facing reality. Health Policy. 2009;89(2):131-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.05.007 PMid:18620778

Beaman J, Schillinger D. Responding to evolving abortion regulations-the critical role of primary care. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):e30. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1903572 PMid:30995367

Fathalla MF. Safe abortion: The public health rationale. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;63:2-12. PMid:31201007

Al-Matary A, Ali J. Controversies and considerations regarding the termination of pregnancy for foetal anomalies in Islam. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-10

Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The ethics of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23(1):64-7. PMid:28986215

Afandi D. Kaidah dasar bioetika dalam pengambilan keputusan klinis yang etis. Maj Kedokt Andalas. 2017;40(2):111-21. https://doi.org/10.22338/mka.v40.i2.p111-121.2017

Beauchamp TL. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2003;29(5):269-74. PMid:14519835

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 190-317.

Veatch RM, Guidry-Grimes LK. The Basics of Bioethics. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2019.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion No. 385 November 2007: The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1203-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000291561.48203.27 PMid:17978145

Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(3):232.e1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.007 PMid:18667194

Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethicaldecisions in Clinical Medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division; 2010. p. 9-225.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Wales and Scotland. England: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2010.

Nofiardi N. Aborsi dalam pandangan hukum islam kaitannya dengan dibolehkannya menurut PP nomor 61 tahun 2014 tentang reproduksi. Alhurriyah J Huk Islam. 2015;16(2):69-92. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mas.v8i2.1321

International Labour Organization. Indonesian Law Number 36 of 2009 Concerning Health. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization; 2009.

International Labour Organization. Regulation of Indonesian Government Number 61 of 2014 Concerning Reproductive Health. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization; 2014.