Impact Evaluation of Healthy City Implementation in Makassar City

Inayyah Nur Fitry; Sukri Palutturi; Ridwan M. Thaha; Aminuddin Syam

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2020.5175

Authors

Inayyah Nur Fitry Department of Health Administration and Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Sukri Palutturi Department of Health Administration and Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Ridwan M. Thaha Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Aminuddin Syam Department of Nutrition Science, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.5175

Keywords:

Evaluation, Impact, Implementation, Healthy, City

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthy city is one of the health development strategies in Indonesia that has been started since 2007. Implementation of healthy city in Makassar has entered its 12^thyear.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the implementation of healthy cities based on aspects of the level of involvement.

METOHDS: This research method uses a qualitative design with a phenomenological approach where research departs from phenomena found in the field and then is developed in depth. Informants in this study were 13 people. Data collection techniques are in-depth interviews and documentation.

RESULTS: The results showed that the involvement of women in the implementation of healthy cities in Makassar was shown from the large number of female workers who were directly involved in various programs launched by the city government related to healthy cities. In addition, many women play an important role by being the head of a healthy subdistrict program in nine subdistricts in the city of Makassar. Whereas the political commitment indicator shows the results that the Makassar city government’s political commitment to the implementation of the healthy city is seen from the achievement of the Makassar city government which has succeeded in getting the highest award in the healthy city, Swasti Saba Wistara 4 times since 2007. After interviews and document review, the evaluation of the impact of the implementation of healthy cities based on women’s involvement and political commitment of the government shows quite good and significant results since the implementation of healthy cities.

CONCLUSION: However, coordination at the government level is expected to be further improved, because there is still frequent miss communication between several Satuan Kerja Pemerintah Daerah in the implementation of tasks to achieve healthy city indicators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Moore M, Gould P, Keary BS. Global urbanization and impact on health. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003;206(4-5):269-78. PMid:12971682

Lisangki D. Studi tentang kredibilitas walikota samarinda dalam meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat untuk mewujudkan kota hijau, bersih dan sehat di Kecamatan Samarinda Hilir. E J Komunikasi Univ Mulawarman. 2015;3:51-62. https://doi. org/10.25273/gulawentah.v1i2.1035

Palutturi S. Healthy Cities: Konsep Global, Implementasi Lokal untuk Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2017.

Soedirham O. Kota Sehat sebagai bentuk sustainable communities best practice. Kesmas Natl Public Health J. 2012;7(2):51-5. https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v7i2.9

Mulasari SA. Membangun Kota Sehat (healthy city) menuju Indonesia sehat berkemajuan. J Pemberdayaan. 2019;2(2):187- 94. https://doi.org/10.12928/jp.v2i2.419

Dinkes Kota Makassar. Penyelenggaraan Kota Sehat di Makassar. Makassar: Dinas Kesehatan Kota Makassar; 2018. https://doi.org/10.32382/medkes.v11i2.236

Iskandar DT, Sumartono S, Domai T. Evaluasi dampak pelaksanaan program pembinaan dan pengembangan industri kecil dan menengah di kabupaten Ponorogo. J Borneo Adm. 2017;13(1):21-40. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v13i1.273

Baum F. Researching public health: Behind the qualitative methodological debate. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(4):459-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0103-y PMid:7725120

Werna E, Harpham T. The evaluation of healthy city projects in developing countries. Habitat Int. 1995;19(4):629-41. https://doi. org/10.1016/0197-3975(95)00023-9

Tahalea SN, Suwitri S, Rostyaningsih D. Evaluasi dampak kebijakan penyelenggaraan pelayanan terpadu satu pintu di badan pelayanan perizinan terpadu kota Semarang. J Public Pol Manage Rev. 2015;4(3):387-99. https://doi.org/10.32528/ politico.v18i1.1377

World Health Organization. Healthy Cities in Action: An Evaluation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.

Japarianto E, Sugiharto S. Pengaruh shopping life style dan fashion involvement terhadap impulse buying behavior masyarakat high income Surabaya. J Manajemen Pemasaran. 2012;6(1):32-41. https://doi.org/10.9744/pemasaran.6.1.32-41

Burton S. Evaluation healthy city projects: Stakeholder analysis of two projects in Bangladesh. Environ Urban. 1999:11(1):41- 52. https://doi.org/10.1630/095624799101284850

Boonekamp GM, Colomer C, Thomas A, Nunez A. Healthy cities evaluation: The coordinators’s perspective. Health Promot Int. 1999;14(2):103-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/14.2.103

Clark DK. The city governments’s role in community health improvement. Public Health Rep. 2000;115(2-3):216-21. PMid:10968757

Kayame R, Mallongi A. Relationships between smoking habits and the hypertension occurrence among the adults of communities in paniai regency, Papua Indonesia. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2018;9(1):332-6. https://doi. org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00061.x

Birawida AB, Selomo M, Mallongi A. Potential hazards from hygiene, sanitation and bacterium of refill drinking water at Barrang Lompo Island (water and food safety perspective) IOP Conf Ser. 2018;157(1):012034. https://doi. org/10.1088/1755-1315/157/1/012034