Counseling Quality of Dangerous Signs of Pregnancy Health in Work Region of Urban and Rural Puskesmas (Public Health Center) Jeneponto
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.5222Keywords:
Quality, Counseling, Pregnancy Danger Signs, Urban, RuralAbstract
BACKGROUND: Quality healthcare is the standard of care received by citizens who are entitled to guarantee their health status due to the poor quality of health care that affect the high mortality.
AIM: This study aimed to determine the difference in counseling quality of pregnancy dangerous signs at the public health centers of urban and rural areas in Jeneponto regency.
METHODS: The type of study was analytical observation with a cross-sectional study design. The populations of this research are all pregnant women in Jeneponto regency in October 2015–May 2016 at the work area of Urban and Rural Public Health centers. There were 278 respondents obtained by proportionate stratified random sampling. Data analysis used computer application of SPSS examined with the Chi-square test.
RESULTS: The results indicate that 85.3% of counseling quality of pregnancy dangerous signs in the work area of urban and rural Puskesmas are categorized bad. There is a difference of counseling quality of pregnancy dangerous sign component of vagina bleeding (p = 0.000), severe headache (p = 0.000), visual problems/blurred sight (p = 0.000), swelling on face and hand (p = 0.001), and severe abdominal pain (p = 0.000), fetus movement is lacking or not felt (p = 0.000) and fever (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: There is no difference in counseling quality based on age, education, job, and parities.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality:1990 to 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
Kemenkes. Informasi Data dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Jakarta: Ministry of Health; 2014.
Tetui M, Ekirapa EK, Bua J, Mutebi A, Tweheyo R, Waiswa P, et al. Quality of antenatal care services in Eastern Uganda: Implications for interventions. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13:1-27. PMid:23308332
Fagbamigbe A, Idemudia E. Assessment of quality of antenatal care services in Nigeria: Evidence from a population-based survey. Reprod Health. 2015;12:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0081-0 PMid:26382228
Ejigu T, Woldie M, Kifle Y. Quality of antenatal care services at public health facilities of Bahir-Dar special zone, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-443
Graham W, Varghese B. Quality: Gaps in the continuum of care. Lancet. 2011;379(9811):5-6. PMid:21474173
Mbalinda S, Nakimuli A, Kakaire O, Osinde MO, Kakande N, Kaye DK. Does knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy predict birth preparedness? A critique of the evidence from women admitted with pregnancy complications. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-60 PMid:25300499
Riskesdas RI. Riset Kesehatan Dasar. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Republik Indonesia; 2013. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2013.24.2.121
Dinkes Jeneponto. Profil Dinas Kesehatan. Jeneponto: Dinkes Jeneponto; 2014.
Anyamene A, Nnokolo C, Anyamene N. Antenatal interest of pregnant women in Awka district, Nigeria: Implication for conselling. Eur Sci J. 2014;10(17):412-7.
Hailu M, Gebremariam A, Alemseged F. Knowledge about obstetric danger signs among pregnant women in Aleta Wondo district, Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia. 2010;20:25-32. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v20i1.69428
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Hafidah Amiruddin, Ansariadi Ansariadi, Sukri Palutturi, Wahidin M. Wahidin, Abdul Rahman Akmal, Zhanaz Tasya, Iva Hardi Yanti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
