The Impact of His Frequency and Religiosity toward Prolonged Second Stage and its Impact of the Placenta Separation in Maternity at Siti Fatimah Hospital Makassar

Sumarni Marwang; Masni Masni; Stang Stang; Anwar Mallongi; Jumrah Sudirman; Nurhidayat Triananinsi

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2020.5228

Authors

Sumarni Marwang Midwifery Study Program, Megarezky University, Makassar, Indonesia
Masni Masni Biostatistic Department, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Stang Stang Biostatistic Department, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Anwar Mallongi Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Jumrah Sudirman Midwife Profession Study Program, Megarezky University, Makassar, Indonesia
Nurhidayat Triananinsi Midwife Proffession Study Program, Megarezky University, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.5228

Keywords:

His frequency, Religiosity, Prolonged second stage and placenta separation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of his frequency and religiosity toward the prolonged second stage and its impact of the placenta separation in maternity at Siti Fatimah Mother and Children Hospital of Makassar.

AIM: This research is conducted in which health and normal factors result in the labor process will take place spontaneous.

METHODS: This study used observational analytic research in a cross-sectional study design. A total sample in this study was 60 respondents using the Lemeshow sample size formula and the sampling technique used consecutive sampling. Data analysis used path analysis with SPSS version 22.00.

RESULTS: The results showed that the frequency of his had an impact on the prolonged second stage with p = 0.046, the frequency of his had no direct impact on the placenta separation with a value of p = 0.313, and the frequency of his had the largest indirect effect on the placenta separation through the prolonged second stage of −0.132 or only −13.2%. Religiosity affected prolonged second stage with a p = 0.037. Religiosity did not have a direct impact on the placenta separation with a value of p = 0.991 and religiosity had the largest indirect effect on the placenta separation through prolonged second stage only −0.148 or −14.8%. In addition, the prolonged second stage had a significant impact on the placenta separation with a value of p = 0.000.

CONCLUSION: His frequency and religiosity affect prolonged second stage but do not directly affect the placenta separation in primigravida at Siti Fatimah Mother and Children Hospital of Makassar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

A Guide to Obstetrical Coding. SF.

World Health Organization. World Health Organization Recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. p. 1-64.

Abdullah T, Arundhana AI, Manyullei S. The effect of counselling intervention during antenatal care on the knowledge and attitude about danger signs in pregnancy: A cross-sectional study in Takalar regency. 2020;1-5.

Yogev Y, Melamed N, Bardin R, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Ben- Shitrit G, Ben-Haroush A. Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(6):558. e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.039 PMid:20965486

Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Heymann WC, Dal Pozzo G, Ronfani L, Barbone F. A systematic evaluation of hospital performance of childbirth delivery modes and associated factors in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015. Sci Rep. 2019;9:19442. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55389-z PMid:31857615

Sudirman J, Sinrang AW, Marwang S, Nurlaily A, Sabar S, Astuti AT, et al. The analysis estradiol levels against sexual desire in perimenopause women in Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Enferm Clin. 2020;30(Suppl 2):350-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.07.117 PMid:32204184

Perlman NC, Carusi DA. Retained placenta after vaginal delivery: Risk factors and management. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:527-34. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s218933 PMid:31632157

Urner F, Zimmermann R, Krafft A. Manual removal of the placenta after vaginal delivery: An unsolved problem in obstetrics. J Pregnancy. 2014;2014:274651. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/274651 PMid:24812585

DewI RK, Budihastuti UR, Pamungkasari EP. Biopsychosocial factors associated with postpartum haemorrhage in Surakarta, Central Java. J Matern Child Health. 2018;3(3):207-15. https://doi.org/10.26911/thejmch.2018.03.03.05

Banõs N, Migliorelli F, Posadas E, Ferreri J, Palacio M. Definition of failed induction of labor and its predictive factors: Two unsolved issues of an everyday clinical situation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38(3):161-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000433429 PMid:26138441

Begley CM, Gyte GM, Devane D, McGuire W, Weeks A, Biesty LM. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2(2):CD007412. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007412.pub5 PMid:30754073

Jansen L, Gibson M, Bowles BC, Leach J. First do no harm: Interventions during childbirth. J Perinat Educ. 2013;22(2):83- 92. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.22.2.83 PMid:24421601

Hanghøj S. When it hurts I think: Now the baby dies. Risk perceptions of physical activity during pregnancy. Women Birth. 2013;26(3):190-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2013.04.004 PMid:23711581

Labor S, Maguire S. The pain of labour. Rev Pain. 2008;2(2):15- 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/204946370800200205 PMid:26526404

Nott JP, Bonney EA, Pickering JD, Simpson NA. The structure and function of the cervix during pregnancy. Transl Res Anat. 2016;2:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2016.02.001

Lothian JA. Saying “No” to induction. J Perinat Educ. 2006;15(2):43-5. https://doi.org/10.1624/105812406x107816

Ghodrati F, Mokhtaryan T, Akbarzadeh M. Effect of pregnancy-related religious training on religious attitudes among pregnant women. J Midwifery Reprod Health. 2018;6(3):1296-304.

Storksen HT, Eberhard-Gran M, Garthus-Niegel S, Eskild A. Fear of childbirth; The relation to anxiety and depression. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(2):237-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01323.x PMid:22085403

Haring M, Smith JE, Bodnar D, Misri S, Little RM, Ryan D. Coping with anxiety during pregnancy and following the birth. BC Ment Health Addict Serv. 2013.

Care J, Bolton MJ, Carlson T, Holowick-sparkes C, Matthews C. Calm in the Storm: Coping with the Stresses of Life. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Klinic Community Health; 2013.

Chamley LW, Holland OJ, Chen Q, Viall CA, Stone PR, Abumaree M. Review: Where is the maternofetal interface? Placenta. 2014;35:S74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2013.10.014 PMid:24239157

Nurhikmah, Abdullah T, Arundhana AI, Stang, Manyullei S. The roles of responsive and empathy of midwives in antenatal care visit of pregnant women in pangkepregency. 2020:1-45.