The Effect of the Implementation of Makassar Healthy City Based on Capacity Building and Sustainability
Keywords:Healthy City, Capacity Building, Sustainability, Makassar
BACKGROUND: This research analyzed the effect of the implementation of healthy city in Makassar City based on the aspects of capacity building and program sustainability.
AIM: This research aimed to analyze the implementation of healthy city in Makassar City based on capacity building and program sustainability aspects.
METHODS: The research was conducted qualitatively in which the data were collected through direct interview, observation, and field note. Thirteen people were involved as informants consisting of vice mayor of Makassar, two organizers of the healthy city of Makassar City, one member from the forum of the healthy center of Makassar City, and nine community members from nine sub-districts including Makassar, Mamajang, Mariso, Panakkukang, Rappocini, Tallo, Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda) of Makassar City, and Indonesian Public Health Bachelor Association (PERSAKMI).
RESULTS: The training and socialization are often ineffective since it is only participated by the coordinators from the healthy city itself. The sustainability of the healthy city program of Makassar City has been implemented well. It was proven by various healthy city appreciation obtained since the implementation of the program. Active involvement and participation from the government, community, agency, and all related stakeholders, as well as strong commitment and desire in the program implementation are the main factor of the sustainability of healthy city program in Makassar City. The suggestion given by this research is to improve the quality of healthy city program but is not based on the consideration of the appreciation.
CONCLUSION: The improvement of the capacity needs to even all forum members of healthy city of Makassar at the level of city, sub-district, and sub-village.
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
Moore M, Gould P, Keary BS. Global urbanization and impact on health. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003;206(4-5):269-78. PMid:12971682
Palutturi S. Healthy Cities: Global Concepts, Local Implementation for Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2018.
Palutturi S, Arifin MA. Re-standardization makassar healthy city based on local needs. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(2):282. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.00302.4
Palutturi S, Chu C, Moon JY, Nam EW. A comparative study on healthy city capacity mapping: Indonesia and Korea. Soc Sci. 2015;10(6):848-54.
Palutturi S, Rutherford S, Davey P, Chu C. Comparison between healthy cities and adipura in Indonesia. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2013a;9(1):35-43.
Palutturi S, Rutherford S, Davey P, Chu C. Healthy Cities Implementation in Indonesia: Challenges and Determinants of Successful Partnership Development At Local Government Level. Australia: Griffith University, Brisbane; 2013b.
MOH. The Guide of Healthy District/City Implementation (Joint Regulation Between The Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Health) Jakarta: Advisory Team of the Healthy District/City at Central Level; 2005.
De Leeuw E. Global and local (glocal) health: The WHO healthy cities programme. Global Change Hum Health. 2001;2(1):34-45.
Edwards P, Tsouros AD. A Healthy City is an Active City: A Physical Activity Planning Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2008.
Harpham T, Burton S, Blue I. Healthy city projects in developing countries: The first evaluation. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(2):111-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/16.2.111
Healthy City Sarawak. Healthy Cities Project; 2002. Available from: http://www.healthycity.sarawak.gov.my/background.html. [Last accessed 2020 Mar 17].
Werna E, Harpham T, Blue I, Goldstein G. Healthy City Projects in Developing Countries: An International Approach to Local Problems. United Kingdom: Earthscan; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315071039
MOHA and MOH. The Guideline of Healthy Districts/Cities Implementation (Joint Regulation Between the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Health) Number: 34/2005 and Number: 1138/MOH/PB/VIII/2005. Jakarta, Indonesia: Healthy Cities Advisory Team; 2005.
Morton M. Applicability of impact evaluation to cohesion policy. In: Paper Presented at the An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. United States: Independent Report; 2009.
Campbell DM, Redman S, Rychentnik L, Cooke M, Zwi AB, Jorm L. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: Practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-6-21 PMid:19698186
Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Premand P, Rawlings LB, Vermeersch CM. Impact Evaluation in Practice. United States: The World Bank; 2016.
Khandker SB, Koolwal G, Samad H. Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. United States: The World Bank; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8028-4
World Health Organization. Healthy Cities in Action: WHO/ UNDP-LIFE Healthy City Projects in Five Countries: An Evaluation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.
Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2017. Available from: http://www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/pusdatin/profil-kesehatan-indonesia/Profil-Kesehatan-Indonesia-tahun-2017. pdf. https://doi.org/10.7454/epidkes.v3i2.3176. [Last accessed 2020 Mar 17].
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Sukri Palutturi, Ridwan M. Thaha, Inayyah Nur Fitry (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved.