Neo-industrialization as the Bases of the Innovative Trajectory of the Development of Russian Industry before and during the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic

Irina O. Malykhina; Victoria N. Riapuhina; Elena N. Chizhova; Irina V. Roydolskaya

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2020.5676

Authors

Irina O. Malykhina Belgorod State Technological University V. G. Shukhov, 308012 Belgorod, Str. Kostyukova 46, Russia
Victoria N. Riapuhina Belgorod State Technological University V. G. Shukhov, 308012 Belgorod, Str. Kostyukova 46, Russia
Elena N. Chizhova Belgorod State Technological University V. G. Shukhov, 308012 Belgorod, Str. Kostyukova 46, Russia
Irina V. Roydolskaya Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, 308023 Belgorod, Str. Sadovaya 116A, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.5676

Keywords:

Innovation trajectory, innovatization, neo-industrialization paradigm, economic systems, modern challenges

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article is devoted to the study and improvement of theoretical approaches to the formation of the neo-industrialization paradigm as the basis of the innovative trajectory of the development of economic systems. The relevance of this study is due to the growing importance of neo-industrialization policies as an objective basis for the transition of the Russian economy to an innovative type.

AIM: The aim of the work is the theoretical justification and development of scientific and practical recommendations for the implementation of the innovative trajectory of the development of economic systems in the conditions of neo-industrial challenges.

METHODS: In the framework of this study, general scientific methods of cognition were used, namely, the method of analysis, synthesis, induction, structural and functional analysis. The article develops theoretical concepts and conceptual foundations of the formation of the neo-industrialization paradigm as the basis for the innovation of the Russian economy. The foreign and Russian experience of the formation and implementation of an innovative model for the development of economic systems with the elimination of specific characteristics of the implementation of innovative processes is studied.

RESULTS: The analysis is made and the most important parameters of the formation of the neo-industrialization paradigm are identified. Modern trends, critical neo-industrial challenges and threats to the innovative development of economic systems are structured, refined and typologized. The most effective instruments of state participation in enhancing innovation processes in the context of neo-industrial challenges have been consolidated.

CONCLUSION: A paradigm concept for the innovation of economic systems in the context of the implementation of neo-industrialization policies has been formed as a response to modern challenges and threats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Yu H. Information society with Chinese characteristics discursive evolution of the neo-industrialisation strategy in the people’s daily. Javnost. 2008;15(3):23-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2008.11008974

Alcácer V, Cruz-Machado V. Scanning the industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2019;22(3):899-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.006

Dašić P. Scientific and Technological Trends: Selected Scientific-professional Papers (in Serbian). Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia: SaTCIP Publesher Ltd.; 2020.

Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A, Gawankar SA. Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Proc Saf Environ Protec. 2018;117:408-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009

Karabegović I, Kovačević A, Banjanović-Mehmedović L, Dašić P, editors. Handbook of Research on Integrating Industry 4.0 in Business and Manufacturing. Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; 2020. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2725-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2725-2

Oztemel E, Gursev S. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J Intell Manufact. 2020;31(1):127-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8

Komninos N, Sefertzi E. Neo-industrialisation and peripherality evidence from regions of Northern Greece. Geoforum. 1998;29(1):37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7185(97)00019-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(97)00019-5

Arzhanovskaya AV, Eltanskaya EA, Milovanova MV. Use of convergent technologies in education as an essential prerequisite for neo-industrialization of Russia. Lect Notes Netw Syst. 2020;110:395-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45913-0_45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45913-0_45

Biryukov VV, Romanenko EV. Economic behavior of business entities, culture and institutions: Specifics of their interrelations in conditions of neo-industrialization. Eur Res Stud J. 2017;20(4):370-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/841

Inshakova EI, Kachalov RM, Inshakova AO. Russian and Eurasian technology platforms: Progress and challenges in accelerating the neo-industrialization processes. Lect Notes Netw Syst. 2020;110:31-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45913-0_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45913-0_4

Inshakova EI, Ryzhenkov AY, Inshakova AO. Neoindustrialization of the Russian economy: Technological and digital development. Stud Comput Intell. 2019;826:239-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_28

Kovalev Y, Sobolev A, Burnasov A. Industrialization, neoindustrialization and post-industrialism in the evolution of the old industrial region (On the example of saar-lor-lux euroregion). Sovremennaya Evropa. 2020;1:158-69. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope12020158169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope12020158169

Hassink R, Dong-Ho S. The restructuring of old industrial areas in Europe and Asia: Editorial. Environ Plann A. 2005;37:571-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a36273

Pipan T. Neo-industrialization models and industrial culture of small towns. GeoScape. 2018;12:10. https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2018-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2018-0002

Zhironkin SA, Hasanov MA. Neo-industrial concept of structural transformations of the Russian economy. Bull Tomsk State Univ. Economy. 2014;4(28):14-24.

Lentchuk EB, Filatov VI, Vlaskin GA, Ivanov AE, Smotritskaya II, Chernykh SI. New Industrialization as a Condition for the Formation of an Innovative Model for the Development of the Russian Economy. Scientific Report. Moscow, Russia: IE-RAS; 2013.

Hospers GJ. Regional Economic Change in Europe: A Neoschumpeterian Vision Volkswirtschaft. Vol. 3. Volkswirtschaft Series; 2004.

Vasiliev NF. Neo-industrialization of the economy: Conditions for launch and implementation. Bull Inst Econ Res. 2016;1(1):49-63.

Banerjee AV. Notes towards a theory of industrialization in the developing world. In: Nirmala B, Marjit S, editors. Development, Displacement and Disparity: India in the Last Quarter of the Twentieth Century. Hyderabad, India: Orient Longman; 1997. p. 139-59.

Doroshenko YA, Malykhina IO, Somina IV. Methodology of the formation of a comprehensive support mechanism of innovation and investment development in the region. Lect Notes Netw Syst. 2020;128:916-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_103

Romanova OA. The innovative component of the new industrialization. Bull Ural State Econ Univ. 2017;5(73):81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2017-17-5-7

Zernov IV, Proshkina LA. New industrialization of Russia as a prospect of economic growth: Problems and directions of development. Bull Penza State Univ. 2016;2(14):30-3.

Dašić P, Dašić J, Antanasković D, Pavićević N. Statistical analysis and modeling of global innovation index (GII) of Serbia. Lect Notes Netw Syst. 2020;128:515-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_59

Tolkachev SA. Neo-industrial challenges of Russia’s economic security. Ind Pol Conditions N Indust. 2015;1:225-36.

Bell D. The Upcoming Post-industrial Society. Experience of Social Forecasting. Moscow, Russia: Academia; 1999.

Doroshenko YA, Starikova MS, Somina IV, Malykhina IO. Improving the performance of high-tech companies based on interactions with subjects of the innovation environment. Reg Econ. 2019;15(4):1279-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-4-24

Krasnyuk LV. Diagnostics of the stages of economic development and the formation of the neo-industrialization paradigm of Russian industry. Economics. 2016;1(235):158-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5862/JE.235.15

Sushkova IA. The Mechanism of Neo-industrialization: Justification Methodology. Vol. 13. Saratov, Russia: Izvestia Saratov University: New Ser Economy, Control, Law. 2013. p. 656-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2013-13-4-2-656-661

Ermoshina TV. The role of investment and public-private partnerships in the neo-industrial economy. Intellect Innov Investment. 2015;3:26-31.

Grimsey D, Lewis MK. Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects. Int J Project Manag. 2002;20(2):107-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00040-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00040-5

Hart O. Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public-private partnerships. Econ J. 2003;113(486):C69-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00119

Hodge GA, Greve C. Public-private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Adm Rev. 2007;67(3):545-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x