Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of Patient Safety Culture Assessment Tool for Clinical Staff in Kazakhstan

Authors

  • Saltanat Kyrykbayeva Semey Medical University, Semey, Kazahstan Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-6025
  • Yuliya Semenova Semey Medical University, Semey, Kazahstan Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1324-7806
  • Maiya Goremykina Semey Medical University, Semey, Kazahstan Republic
  • Timur Moldagaliyev Semey Medical University, Semey, Kazahstan Republic
  • Almagul Kauysheva Kazakhstan’s Medical University “KSPH”, Almaty, Kazakhstan Republic
  • Sharafaddin Azizov Urology Research Centre, Almaty, Kazakhstan Republic
  • Elisabetta Trinchero SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9160-1084

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5769

Keywords:

Safety culture, Tool, Translation, Adaptation, Validation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern healthcare systems lack empirical models and appropriate tools to evaluate the safety culture, which encourages the need for their development. The national healthcare system of Kazakhstan has no empirically tested robust tools to evaluate the safety culture.

AIM: The present paper aims at performing translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the “Patient safety culture” tool (from here – the tool) as a means for evaluating safety culture in healthcare establishments of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

METHODS: The study design was cross-sectional. The original “Patient safety culture” tool is an integrated evaluation framework consisting of 7 scales and 62 items (6 general questions and 56 targeted questions) and reflecting different aspects of risk-related components of safety culture. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 was used to measure the internal consistency of the tool. To evaluate the tool’s reproducibility, we performed a test-retest assessment after 15 days and evaluated it using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

RESULTS: The overall Cronbach’s alpha for different scales ranged from 0.27 to 0.75. Subscales “Safety procedures” and “Safety Training” had the lowest coefficients. At test-retest, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient ranged from 0.934 to 0.969 among the scales.

CONCLUSION: The study is dedicated to cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the “Patient safety culture” tool and describes the development of a translation protocol with subsequent cognitive debriefing and field testing. The field testing helped to confirm good validity, reliability, and reproducibility. The tool might undergo additional modification after further testing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Trinchero E, Farr-Wharton B, Brunetto Y; Workplace Relationships. Psychological capital. In: Accreditation and Safety Culture: A New Framework of Analysis within Healthcare Organizations, Public Organization Review. Vol. 19. Berlin: Springer; 2019. p. 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0390-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0390-6

Verbakel NJ, Langelaan M, Verheij TJ, Wagner C, Zwart DL. Effects of patient safety culture interventions on incident reporting in general practice: A cluster randomised trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(634):e319-29. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15x684853 PMid:25918337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X684853

Verbano C, Turra F. A human factors and reliability approach to clinical risk management: Evidence from Italian cases. Saf Sci. 2010;48(5):625-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.014

Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000.l

Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: A systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):216-23. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.023622 PMid:18519629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.023622

Briner M, Manser T, Kessler O. Clinical risk management in hospitals: Strategy. central coordination and dialogue as key enablers. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(2):363-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01836.x PMid:22409240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01836.x

Awolusi IG, Marks ED. Safety activity analysis framework to evaluate safety performance in construction. J Constr Eng Manag. 2017;143(3):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001265

Molenaar KR, Park J, Washington S. Framework for measuring corporate safety culture and its impact on construction safety performance. J Constr Eng Manag. 2009;135(6):488-96. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2009)135:6(488) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:6(488)

Tam VW, Fung IW. Behavior, attitude and perception toward safety culture from mandatory safety training course. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 2012;138(3):207-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000104

El-Jardali F, Dimassi H, Jamal D, Jaafar M, Hemadeh N. Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture in hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-45 PMid:21349179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-45

Huang DT, Clermont G, Kong L, Weissfeld LA, Sexton JB, Rowan KM, et al. Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: A US multicenter study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(3):151-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzq017 PMid:20382662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzq017

Kline TJ, Willness C, Ghali WA. Determinants of adverse events in hospitals--the potential role of patient safety culture. J Healthc Qual. 2008;30(1):11-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.2008.tb01122.x PMid:18257452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.2008.tb01122.x

Yates GR, Hochman RF, Sayles SM, Stockmeier CA. Sentara Norfolk General Hospital: Accelerating improvement by focusing on building a culture of safety. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30(10):534-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30063-8 PMid:15518357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30063-8

Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards; 2017. Available from: http://www.jcrinc.com. [Last accessed on 2021 Feb 08].

Aiypkhanova AT. Guidance on the Interpretation of Updated Accreditation Standards for Medical Organizations Providing Outpatient Care (3 Peresmotr); 2017.

Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH and QuickDASH outcome measures. Inst Work Health. 2007;1(1):1-45.

Almehrizi RS. Coefficient alpha and reliability of scale scores. Appl Psychol Meas. 2013;37(6):438-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621613484983

Haragus H, Deleanu B, Prejbeanu R, Timar B, Levai C, Vermesan D. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Romanian hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018;31(4):307-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy156 PMid:30052971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy156

Dauletyarova M, Semenova Y, Kaylubaeva G, Manabaeva G, Khismetova Z, Akilzhanova Z, et al. Are women of east Kazakhstan satisfied with the quality of maternity care? Implementing the WHO tool to assess the quality of hospital services. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45(6):729-38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020325 PMid:27648415

Dauletyarova MA, Semenova YM, Kaylubaeva G, Manabaeva GK, Toktabayeva B, Zhelpakova MS, et al. Are Kazakhstani women satisfied with antenatal care? Implementing the WHO tool to assess the quality of antenatal services. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020325 PMid:29438330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020325

Robida A. Hospital survey on patient safety culture in Slovenia: A psychometric evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care. 2013;25(4):469-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt040 PMid:23736832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt040

Smits M, Dingelhoff IC, Wagner C, Wal GV, Groenewegen PP. The psychometric properties of the “hospital survey on patient safety culture” in Dutch hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-230 PMid:18990256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-230

Stoyanova R, Dimova R, Tarnovska M, Boeva T. Linguistic validation and cultural adaptation of Bulgarian version of hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPSC). Open Access Maced. J Med Sci. 2018;6(5):925-30. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.222 PMid:29875873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.222

Maroco J, Garcia-Marques T. How reliable is the alpha of Cronbach? Old issues and modern solutions? Lab Psicol. 2006;4(1):65-90. https://doi.org/10.14417/lp.763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14417/lp.763

Downloads

Published

2021-05-14

How to Cite

1.
Kyrykbayeva S, Semenova Y, Goremykina M, Moldagaliyev T, Kauysheva A, Azizov S, Trinchero E. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of Patient Safety Culture Assessment Tool for Clinical Staff in Kazakhstan. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 May 14 [cited 2024 Nov. 25];9(E):340-5. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/5769

Issue

Section

Public Health Education and Training

Categories