Evaluation of Maximum Biting Force in Two Different Attachment Systems (Bollard vs. Ball and Socket) Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A Split-mouth Design

Authors

  • Reham Tharwat Kamal Elbeheiry Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minya University, Minya, Egypt
  • Gehan F. Mohamed Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minya University, Minya, Egypt
  • Amr Mohamed Ismail Badr Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minya University, Minya, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5829

Keywords:

Bollard, Ball and socket, Maximum biting force

Abstract

AIM: The study was conducted to evaluate maximum biting force (MBF) in two different attachment systems (bollard a vs. ball and socket attachment) retaining mandibular overdenture using a split-mouth design.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twelve completely edentulous patients received complete dentures and after adaption of the patient with the new denture, 24 implants were inserted in the canine region using two-stage surgical technique and conventional loading protocol. Six patients received the Bollard attachment at the right side and the Ball and Socket at the left side. Moreover, the other six patients received the bollard attachment at the left side and the ball and socket attachment at the right side. Each patient was treated according to split-mouth design. Insertion of each of the attachment type was assigned randomly. Using occlusal force meter instrument, MBF was measured immediately after loading (0), after 6 months (6), and after 12 months (12).

RESULTS: Significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) were obvious in in MBF between Attachment (1) and Attachment (2) immediately after loading (0 months), after 6 months (6) and after 12 months (12) follow-up visits.

CONCLUSION: Mandibular implant retained overdenture received Bollard abutment that retained with the denture by the help of resilient liner “Retention.sil”* without housing have higher biting forces than mandibular implant retained overdenture with ball abutment where the plastic house was picked up by monomer free self-cured acrylic resin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

Author Biography

Reham Tharwat Kamal Elbeheiry, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minya University, Minya, Egypt

Assistant lecturer, Removable Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry Minya University

References

Anas El-Wegoud M, Fayyad A, Kaddah A, Nabhan A. Bar versus ball attachments for implant-supportedoverdentures in complete edentulism: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018,20:243-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12551 PMid:29071777

Glossary of Implant Dentistry III. International Congress of Oral Implantologists; 2017.

Burns DR. The mandibular complete overdenture. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48(3):603-23. PMid:15261796

Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(2):128-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00339-1 PMid:12737242

Svetlize CA, Bodereau EF Jr. Comparative study of re-tentive anchor systems for overdentures. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(6):443-8. PMid:15202589

Luthra R, Sharma A, Kaur P. Implant supported overdenture: A case report. Periodon Prosthodon. 2016;2:2. https://doi.org/10.21767/2471-3082.100018

Lachmann S, Kimmerle-Müller E, Gehring K, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Watzek G, et al. A comparison of implant supported bar or ball retained mandibular overdentures: A retrospective clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic study of 10 edentulous patients attending a recall visit. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(1):37-42. PMId:17319360

Niedermeier W. 3-year clinical trial of the bollard coping. Z Zahnärztl Imp. 2003;19:99-106.

Kimoto S, Kimoto K, Gunji A, Kawai Y, Murakami H, Tanaka K, et al. Clinical effects of acrylic resilient denture liners applied to mandibular complete dentures on the alveolar ridge. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(11):862-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01728.x PMid:17919254

Kimoto S, Kimoto K, Gunji A, Kawai Y, Murakami H, Tanaka K, et al. Effects of resilient denture liner in mandibular complete denture on the satisfaction ratings of patients at the first appointment following denture delivery. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;52(2):160-6. https://doi.org/10.2186/jjps.52.160 PMid:18467785

Pisani MX, Malheiros-Segundo Ade L, Balbino KL, de Souza RF, Paranhos Hde F, da Silva CH. Oral health related quality of life of edentulous patients after denture relining with a silicone-based soft liner. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):474-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00503.x PMid:21696442

Preoteasa E, Imre M, Lerner H, Tancu AM, Preoteasa CT. Narrow Diameter and Mini Dental Implant Overdentures. London: IntechOpen; 2015. p. 978-953. https://doi.org/10.5772/59514

Altaf D, Nawaz MS, Hassan M, Hassan A, Haseeb M, Malik A. Association of handedness and maximum voluntary bite force on respective side of oral cavity. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2020;7(11):872-5.

Guimarães EA, Cabral AL, Sousa LR, Júnior PC, da Sousa GC, Neto AJ. Influence of body position on maximum bite force. Manual Ther Posturol Rehabil J. 2017;15:525.

Amid R, Ebrahimi N, Kadkhodazadeh M, Mirakhori M, Mehrinejad P, Nematzadeh F, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new device to measure maximum bite force. Dent Case Rep 2018;2(2):26-9.

Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Anderson G, Goulet JP, List T, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Fac Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12378 PMid:24482784

da Said AV, Takaki PB, Vieira MM, Bommarito S. Relationship between maximum bite force and the gonial angle in crossbite. Dent Oral Craniofac Res 2017;3(5):1-5. https://doi.org/10.15761/docr.1000215

Dıraçoğlu D, Alptekin K, Cifter ED, Güçlü B, Karan A, Aksoy C. Relationship between maximal bite force and tooth wear in bruxist and non-bruxist individuals. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56(12):1569- 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.06.019 PMid:21783173

Geckili O, Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Dayan C, Yabul A, Tuncer N. Comparison of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and bite force between elderly edentulous patients wearing mandibular two implant-supported overdentures and conventional complete dentures after 4 years. Spec Care Dent. 2012;32(4):136-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-4505.2012.00258.x PMid:22784321

Murata H, Taguchi N, Hamada T, Kawamura M, McCabe JF. Dynamic viscoelasticity of soft liners and masticatory function. J Dent Res. 2002;81(2):123-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0810123 PMid:11827257

Hayakawa I, Hirano S, Takahashi Y, Keh ES. Changes in the masticatory function of complete denture wearers after relining the mandibular denture with a soft denture liner. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(3):227-31. https://doi.org/10.2186/ prp.3.25 PMid:11203637

Alqutaibi A, Kaddah A. Attachments used with implant supported overdenture. Int Dent Med J Adv Res. 2016;1:1-5.

Boven GC, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient’s satisfaction with implant overdentures: A systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(3):220-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12241 PMid:25307515

Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2008. p. 812-813.

Chung KH, Chung CY, Cagna DR, Cronin RJ Jr. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont. 2004;13(4):221-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2004.04042.x PMid:15610542

Thompson GW, Kriesel PS. The impact of demographics of aging and the edentulous condition on dental care service. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(1):56-9. PMid:9474542

Preoteasa E, Tancu AM, Preoteasa CT. Retention Sil as Silicone Matrices for Implant Overdenture. Bucharest, Romania: Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy; 2014. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2019-0028

Kalachev YS, Iordanov PI, Chaprashikian OG, Manohin E. Measurmaent of the magnitude of the occlusal forces during articulation. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2001;43(1-2):97-100. PMid:15354479

Borie E, Orsi IA, Fuentes R, Beltrán V, Navarro P, Pareja F, et al. Maximum bite force in elderly indigenous and non-indigenous denture wearers. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(3):115-9. PMid:25560689

Rismanchian M, Bajoghli F, Mostajeran Z, Fazel A, Eshkevari PS. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(4):196-200. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336-35.4.196 PMid:19813425

Downloads

Published

2021-03-08

How to Cite

1.
Elbeheiry RTK, Mohamed GF, Badr AMI. Evaluation of Maximum Biting Force in Two Different Attachment Systems (Bollard vs. Ball and Socket) Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A Split-mouth Design. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 8 [cited 2022 Jan. 24];9(D):47-53. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/5829

Issue

Section

Prosthodontics

Categories