Microhardness Assessment of Two Nanohybrid Composite Resins with Two Curing Technologies

Ebaa Ibrahim Alagha; Mustafa  Ibrahim Alagha

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2021.5868

Authors

Ebaa Ibrahim Alagha Department of Restorative Dentistry, Al-Farabi Private Colleges, Faculty of Dentistry, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Mustafa Ibrahim Alagha Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5868

Keywords:

Nanohybrid composite resin, Curing devices, Microhardness, Laser curing

Abstract

AIM:This study evaluated the influence of two light sources on the microhardness of two recent composite resins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 specimens were prepared and divided into two groups according to the composite resin restoration used (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk fill) and (Universal Nanohybrid Mosaic). Each group was subdivided into four subgroups according to the curing sources used with different curing duration’s laser curing system (SIROLaser) for 10, 15, and 20 s and conventional blue light system (LED) for 20 s. A microhardness testing machine was used to assess the microhardness of Tetric EvoCeram Bulk fill and Universal Nanohybrid Mosaic. Two-way ANOVA statistical test was used for comparing resin composite and curing energy effect on different variable studied. One-way ANOVA followed by pair-wise Tukey’s post hoc tests was performed to detect significance between each composite subgroups and t-test for subgroups. P ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically significant in all tests.

RESULTS: LED cured Tetric EvoCeram Bulk fill composite resin recorded higher bottom to top ratio (B/T ratio) than laser cured one and the difference in B/T ratio between both energies was statistically non-significant. LED cured Mosaic composite resin recorded higher B/T ratio than laser cured one . The difference in bottom to top ratio between both curing devices was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: SIROLaser Blue laser device increases the degree of polymerization and achieves better curing of composite resins than LED.

RECOMMENDATION: Different types of curing systems are present in the dental practice. The use of SIROLaser Blue laser to photopolymerize composite resin will offers proper polymerization properties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Bahbishi N, Mzain W, Badeeb B, Nassar H. Color stability and micro-hardness of bulk-fill composite materials after exposure to common beverages. Materials. 2020;13(3):787. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030787 PMid:32050415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030787

Segalin AS, Fernandez D, Oliveria B, Loguercio A, Reis A. Marginal adaptation, and hardness of resin composite restorations activated with four energies. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(5):3030-10; discussion 311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00135.x PMid:16225795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00136.x

AlSagob E, Bardwell D, Ali A, Khayat S, Stark P. Comparison of microleakage between bulk-fill flowable and nanofilled resin-based composites. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2018;10(2):102-9. https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.10.2018.07 PMid:30363354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.10.2018.07

de Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jasse F, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42(5):575-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.007 PMid:24561041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.007

Zorzina R, Maiera E, Harrea S, Feyb S, Bellia R, Lohbauera U, et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: Polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater. 2015;31(3):293-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.010 PMid:25582061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.010

Antonson S, Antonson D, Hardigan P. Should my new curing light be an LED? Oper Dent. 2008;33(4):400-7. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-103 PMid:18666497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/07-103

Rueggeberg F, Giannini M, Arrais C, Price R. Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: A literature review. Braz Oral Res. 2017;28(31 Suppl 1):e61. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0061 PMid:28902241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0061

Hubbezoğlu I, Bolayir G, Doga A, Ozer A. Microhardness evaluation of resin composites polymerized by three different light sources. Dent Mater J. 2007;26(6):845-53. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.845 PMid:18203490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.845

Wazir N, Choudhary D, Rathore H. An in vitro study to evaluate depth of cure of bulk-fill composites a comparative study. Int J Res Health Allied Sci. 2020;2(6):59-61. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-163

Cetin A, Hataysal A, Kaplan T, Botsali M. Depth of cure and microhardness of a new composite vs. bulk-fill composites. J Res in Med Dent Sci. 2019;7(5):53-9.

Rode K, Kawano Y, Turbino M. Evaluation of curing light distance on resin composite microhardness and polymerization. Oper Dent. 2007;32(6):571-8. PMid:18051007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/06-163

Malhotra N, Mala K. Light curing considerations for resin based composite materials: A review part I. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(7):498-506; quiz 506, 508. PMid:20879203

Dun W, Bush A. A comparison of polymerization by light-emitting diode and halogen-based light-curing units. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(3):335-41. PMid:11934189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0173

Christensen GJ. The curing light dilemma. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(6):761-3. PMid:12083654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0276

Alvim H, Alecio A, Vasconcellos W, Furlan M, de Oliveira J, Saad J. Analysis of camphorquinone in composite resins as a function of shade. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1245-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.002 PMid:17204320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.002

Maktabi H, Balhaddad A, Alkhubaizi Q, Strassler H, Melo M. Factors influencing success of radiant exposure in light curing posterior dental composite in the clinical setting. Am J Den.2018;31(6):320-8. PMid:30658380

Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts D. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental resin-composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30(2):149-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.011 PMid:24268044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.011

Ceballos L, Fuentes M, Tafalla H, Martínez A, Flores J, Rodríguez J. Curing effectiveness of resin composites at different exposure times using LED and halogen units. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14(1):51-6. PMid:19114957

Knezevic A, Ristic M, Demoli N, Tarle Z, Music S, Negovetic V. Composite photopolymerization with diode laser. Oper Dent. 2007;32(3):279-84. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-79 PMid:17555180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/06-79

Nogueira J, Borsatto M, de Souza-Zaron W, Ramos R, Palma- Dibb R. Microhardness of composite resins at different depths varying the post-irradiation time. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15(4):305-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572007000400012 PMid:19089149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000400012

Dickens S, Stansbury J, Choi K, Floyd C. Photopolymerization kinetics of methacrylate dental resins. Macromolecules. 2003;36(16):6043-53. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma021675k DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ma021675k

Kelić K, Matić S, Marović D, Klarić E, Tarle Z. Microhardness of bulk-fill composite materials. Acta Clin Croat. 2016;55(4):607-14. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2016.55.04.11 PMid:29117652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2016.55.04.11

Masotti A, Onófrio Á, Conceição E, Spohr A. UV-vis spectrophotometric direct transmittance analysis of composite resins. Dent Mater. 2007;23(6):724-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.020 PMid:16914194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.020

Leprince J, Hadis M, Shortall A, Ferracane J, Devaux J, Leloup G, et al. Photoinitiator type and applicability of exposure reciprocity law in filled and unfilled photoactive resins. Dent Mater. 2011;27(2):157-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.011 PMid:21067803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.011

Dionysopoulos D, Papadopoulos C, Koliniotou- Koumpia E. Effect of temperature, curing time, and filler composition on surface microhardness of composite resins. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(2):114-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153071 PMid:25829688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.153071

Aguiar F, Braceiro A, Lima D, Ambrosano G, Lovadino J. Effect of light curing modes and light curing time on the microhardness of a hybrid composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8(6):1- 8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-8-6-1 PMid:17846665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-8-6-1

Neo BJ, Soh MS, Teo JW, Yap AU. Effectiveness of composite cure associated with different light-curing regimes. Oper Dent. 2005;30:671-5.

Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P. The effect of composition, temperature and post-irradiation curing of bulk fill resin composites on polymerization efficiency. Mater Res. 2016;19(2):466-73. https://doi.rg/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2015-0614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-0614

Soares P, Peres T, Wobido A, Machado A. Composite resin in the last 10 years literature review. Part 1: Chemical composition. J Clin Dent Res. 2019;16(1):45-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14436/2447-911x.16.2.097-112.oar

Harrington E, Wilson H. Determination of radiation energy emitted by light activation units. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22(5):377- 85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00788.x PMid:7616349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00788.x

Manhart J, Kunzelmann K, Chen H, Hickel R. Mechanical properties, and wear behaviour of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2000;16(1):33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00082-2 PMid:11203521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00082-2