A Mobile Health App for Premarital Related Word Advice (AmeeSehat): Usability and Usefulness Evaluation Study

Authors

  • Zulvi Wiyanti Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, West Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Fadil Oenzil Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, West Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Masrul Masrul Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, West Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Defriman Djafri Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, West Sumatera, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5914

Keywords:

Counseling, Premarital, Mobile application, Usability, Usefulness

Abstract

Background:Premarital counseling demonstrates promising approach for enhancing interaction between couples and to prevent deterioration in the well-being of relationships. Mobile health (mHealth) apps may provide an appropriate solution to this issue, as many potential brides and grooms are frequent users of internet or web-based health info.

Aim:This research aimed to measure the usability and usefulness of the AmeeSehat App as interpreted by potential end users.

Method: This study employed a mixed method carried out in one of the public-health centers in East Jakarta, Indonesia with the future bride and groom. Think Aloud (TA) sessions with participants (n=10 final users and 3 experts) and quantitative assessment with 60 participants were held.A think aloud meetings have been captured, transcripts, and analyzed. The usability issues were evaluated using Nielsen severity scale and the Device Usability Scale (SUS). The usefulness of the AmeeSehat App was assessed using a tool to evaluate an improvement in healthy family knowledge, attitude, and intention, and readiness to marry.

Results: The SUS score obtained (mean=78.4, SD=6.83), and none of the participants experienced (severe) problems with usability. Only 1 usability problems have been reported with a severity of 3 (major), namely terminology issues. The change after using AmeeSehat was statistically significant different as McNemar test revealed p <0.05.

Conclusion:This researcher revealed that, in terms of its usability and usefulness, the AmeeSehat app is feasible to future brides and grooms. Participants considered AmeeSehat beneficial because they had the opportunity to learn more about a stable home life in preparation for marriage. Further assessment should be carried out in the form of a randomized controlled trial to test AmeeSehat's effectiveness in enhancing awareness, attitude, intention and readiness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Murayama S. Regional standardization in the age at marriage: A comparative study of preindustrial Germany and Japan. Hist Fam. 2001;6:303-24.

Zarabi V, Mostafavi F. Measuring factors affecting marriage in women of the Iranian view economic. J Econ Study. 2012;4:33-64.

Hosseini H, Gravnd M. Measuring factors affecting of behavior and attitudes women to marriage age in the city Kohdasht. Women Dev Polit J. 2014;11:101-18.

Sadr Al Ashrafi M, Shamkhani A, Yousefi Afrasfteh M. Investigate factors affecting in the easy marriage from the student’s women view Payame Noor University Razan. J Cult Eng. 2013;69:86-101.

Lavner JA, Bradbury TN, Karney BR. Incremental change or initial differences? Testing two models of marital deterioration. J Fam Psychol. 2012;26(4):606-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029052 PMid:22709260

Komnas Perempuan. Komnas Perempuan’s Annual Note Fact Sheet (CATAHUN) 2020 the Maze of Violence Against Women From Gang Rape to Femicide, Alarm for the State to Act Appropriately; 2020. Available from: https://www.komnasperempuan.go.id. [Last accessed on 2021 Feb 10]

Shahhosseini Z, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Souraki MK. The effects of premarital relationship enrichment programs on marriage strength: A narrative review article. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2014;1:62-72. https://doi.org/10.4103/2345-5756.231408

Stelzer K. Marriage education with Hispanic couples: Evaluation of a communication workshop. Fam Sci Rev. 2010;15:1-14.

Stanley SM, Amato PR, Johnson CA, Markman HJ. Premarital education, marital quality, and marital stability: Findings from a large, random household survey. J Fam Psychol. 2006;20(1):117-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.117 PMid:16569096

Duncan SF, Childs GR, Larson JH. Perceived helpfulness of four different types of marriage preparation interventions. Fam Relat. 2010;59:623-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00628.x

DeMaria R. Psychoeducation and enrichment: Clinical considerations for couple and family therapy. In: Sexton TL, Weeks GR, Robbins MS, editors. Handbook of Family Therapy. United Kingdom: Brunner-Routledge; 2003. p. 411-30.

Ramezankhani A, Mohammadi G, Akrami F, Ghanbari S, Alidousti FA. Quality gap in premarital education and consultation program in the health centers of Shahid Beheshti Medical University. Pajoohandeh J. 2011;16:169-77.

Yazdanpanah M, Eslami M, Nakhaee N. Effectiveness of the Premarital Education Programme in Iran, ISRN Public Health; 2014. p. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/964087

Ibrahim NK, Bashawri J, Al Bar H, Al Ahmadi J, Al Bar A, Qadi M, et al. Premarital Screening and genetic counseling program: Knowledge, attitude, and satisfaction of attendees of governmental outpatient clinics in Jeddah. J Infect Public Health. 2013;6(1):41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2012.05.001 PMid:23290092

Denysenko A. Peculiarities of psychological readiness of adolescent girls for marital relationships. Herald Kiev Inst Bus Technol. 2020;43(1):75-81. https://doi.org/10.37203/kibit.2020.43.11

Kemenkes RI. Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2014 Concerning Health Services for the Period Before Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Period after Childbirth, Implementation of Contraception Services, as Well as Sexual Health. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI; 2014.

Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam Nomor: DJ.II/542 Tahun 2013 About the Guidelines for Organizing Pre-Marriage Courses; 2013.

Erlyani N, Zwagery RV. Village pramarital counseling program (Koprade) to increase marriage readiness for potential partners in communities on the banks of the Martapura River, Banjar Regency. Proceedings of the National Land Environment Seminar Wet. 2018;3(2):525-30.

Oktalia J. Conscience Module use in Preconception Class for Prospective Quality Assurance for the Quality of Pregnancy Planning for Couples of Early Age. Jakarta: Poltekkes Jakarta Kemenkes RI; 2014.

Badawy SM, Kuhns LM. Texting and mobile phone app interventions for improving adherence to preventive behavior in adolescents: A systematic review. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2017;5(4):e50. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6837 PMid:28428157

de la Vega R, Miró J. mHealth: A strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101312 PMid:24999983

Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M, et al. Mobile health technology evaluation: The mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(2):228-36. PMid:23867031

Majeed-Ariss R, Baildam E, Campbell M, Chieng A, Fallon D, Hall A, et al. Apps and adolescents: A systematic review of adolescents’ use of mobile phone and tablet apps that support personal management of their chronic or long-term physical conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(12):e287. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5043 PMid:26701961

Jaspers MW. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(5):340-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002 PMid:19046928

Peute LW, de Keizer NF, Jaspers MW. The value of retrospective and concurrent think aloud in formative usability testing of a physician data query tool. J Biomed Inform. 2015;55:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.006 PMid:25733166

Overdijkink SB, Velu AV, Rosman AN, van Beukering MD, Kok M, Steegers-Theunissen RP. The usability and effectiveness of mobile health technology-based lifestyle and medical intervention apps supporting health care during pregnancy: Systematic review. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2018;6(4):e109. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8834 PMid:29691216

Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory and Exercise of Control Over HIV Infection, Preventing AIDS; 1996. p. 25-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1193-3_3

Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev. 1980;87(3):215-51.

Brooke J. SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL, editors. Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996. p. 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35

Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. United States: Morgan Kaufmann; 1994.

Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud. 2009;4(3):114-23. Available from: http://www.uxpajournal.org/determining-what-individual-susscores-mean-adding-anadjective-rating-scale. [Last accessed on 2021 Feb 10].

Torkian S, Mostafavi F, Pirzadeh A. Effect of a mobile application intervention on knowledge, attitude and practice related to healthy marriage among youth in Iran. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:312. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.22698/v1 PMid:33426116

Papalia DE. Experience Human Development. McGraw: Hill Education; 2014.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-26

How to Cite

1.
Wiyanti Z, Oenzil F, Masrul M, Djafri D. A Mobile Health App for Premarital Related Word Advice (AmeeSehat): Usability and Usefulness Evaluation Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 26 [cited 2021 Sep. 20];9(E):474-80. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/5914

Issue

Section

Public Health Education and Training

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)