Features of Physical Development in Adolescents Aged 12–14 Years: Assessment and Analysis

Authors

  • Nurgulim Akhmad Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Tole Bist. 94, 050000, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Dinara Baigamyssova Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Tole Bist. 94, 050000, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Altyn Abilova Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Tole Bist. 94, 050000, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Ardana Balapanova Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Tole Bist. 94, 050000, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Umit Keldigulova Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Tole Bist. 94, 050000, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Gulzhan Alzhanbekova Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Tole Bist. 94, 050000, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Meiramkul Okhanova Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Tole Bist. 94, 050000, Almaty, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5950

Keywords:

Children, Physical development, Anthropometric indicators, Puberty

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The review examines the main stages of the formation of anthropometric monitoring of the physical development of children and adolescents in pediatric practice. Various factors that have a complex effect on the growth and physical development of the child’s body are shown.

AIM: The aim of research is to identify features of physical development in adolescents aged 12–14 years and make assessment and analysis. The importance of conducting modern research to determine the anthropometric indicators of the norm for children and adolescents living in different regions is indicated. The research was conducted in educational institutions.

METHODS: A total of 756 boys and girls aged 13–14 were examined. The study of the main trends in the formation of physical and sexual development of children and adolescents over the past decade can serve as a basis for the development of measures to preserve reproductive health.

RESULTS: Assessment of the physical development of children showed that 72-73% of children aged 13-14 years have a harmonious (normal) physical development. Among 14-year-olds, the deficit is relatively more common among girls, and the excess is the opposite among boys.

CONCLUSION: The progress of the external signs of puberty at the height of puberty was determined by the actual age (internal clock, i.e., the genetic program) and, in addition, and independently of this, the achieved body weight.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Antonov OV. Scientific, Methodological and Organizational Approaches to The Prevention of Congenital Malformations in Children. Doctor of Medical Sciences, Omsk; 2007. p. 48.

Antsiferova ES. Complex Assessment of Physical Development of Candidates for Training and Pupils of Military Educational Institutions of Secondary General Education: Abstract of the Dissertation of the Candidate of Medical Sciences, St. Petersburg; 2007. p. 20.

Baranov AA, Shcheplyagina LA. Fundamental and applied problems of pediatrics at the present stage. Russ Pediatr J. 2005;3:4-8.

Veltischev YE. Problems of children’s health protection in Russia. Perinatol Pediatr. 2000;1:5-9.

Deryabin VE, Fedotova TK, Gorbacheva AK. Influence of some biological factors on the somatic status of children aged 3-5 years. G N Speransky Pediatr. 2007;86(5):64-8.

Drozhzhina OA, Ippolitova LI, Yakuninskaya AM. Analysis of Physical Development and Structure of Morbidity in Children who have Suffered Severe Asphyxia in Childbirth [Electronic Resource]. Voronezh State Medical Academy named after N. N. Burdenko. Available from: http://www.airspb.ru/reger_21^sh1 [Last accessed on 2021 Jul 15].

Kaznacheev VP, Peterson VD, Selyatitskaya VG. Physical development and health status of children in adolescence born to women who were ill during pregnancy. Bull SB RAMS. 2004;1(111):8-13.

Kozlov AI, Vershubskaya GG, Lisitsyn DV. Long-term changes in the anthropometric indicators of children in some ethnic groups of the Russian Federation. Speransky Pediatr. 2009;87(3):63-7.

Kotysheva EN, Jundzha NA, Bolotskaya MY. Analysis of anthropometric indicators of physical development of children 5-7 years old in the conditions of an industrial city. Speransky Pediatr. 2008;87(2):140-3.

Kranz VM. Physical development of children with renal pathology. Speransky Pediatr. 2007;86(1):73-9.

Lymar OA, Abushkevich VV. Morphofunctional features of physical development of children of primary school age of general education and special correctional schools. 2006;2(19):30.

Mamchik NP, Gabbasova NV, Kuprina NP. Probabilistic risk factors of the environment in the formation of morbidity with diseases. Speransky Pediatr. 2008;87(6):141-6.

Nagaeva EV. Growth as a criterion of child health. G N Speransky Pediatr. 2009;87(3):58-63.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-22

How to Cite

1.
Akhmad N, Baigamyssova D, Abilova A, Balapanova A, Keldigulova U, Alzhanbekova G, Okhanova M. Features of Physical Development in Adolescents Aged 12–14 Years: Assessment and Analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Nov. 22 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];9(A):1104-8. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/5950