Comparison of Emergency Medical Services Duration amid Routine Service for COVID-19 Patients

Authors

  • Korakot Apiratwarakul Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-0865
  • Takaaki Suzuki Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
  • Ismet Celebi Department of Paramedic, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Kamonwon Ienghong Department of Emergency Medicine
  • Thanat Tangpaisarn Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • Somsak Tiamkao Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • Vajarabhongsa Bhudhisawasdi Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5953

Keywords:

Emergency medical services, Ambulances, Response time, COVID-19

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerning the COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand, the number of patients has been increasing. Emergency medical services (EMS) operating duration differs from normal services due to equipment preparation, number of personnel, and on-board ambulance procedures. Notably, there have been no studies examining EMS duration regarding COVID-19 patients.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the EMS time for COVID-19 patients and routine services.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary university hospital in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Information gathering was carried out by employing the Srinagarind Hospital EMS database throughout January 1, 2020, and February 10, 2021.

RESULTS: A total of 2420 EMS operations were examined, of which five tested positive for COVID-19 (0.21%). The mean age of the COVID-19 patients was 35.6 ± 7.2 years, with the activation interval for COVID-19 and routine services at 64.20 ± 10.14 and 1.42 ± 0.42 min, respectively (p < 0.001). The on-scene time for COVID-19 and routine services was 3.20 ± 0.44 and 5.20 ± 2.20 min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: EMS operating time amid the activation interval for COVID-19 patients was significantly longer than in the normal group. However, on-scene time for COVID-19 patients was less time than in normal operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Heinzerling A, Stuckey MJ, Scheuer T, Xu K, Perkins KM, Resseger H, et al. Transmission of COVID-19 to health care personnel during exposures to a hospitalized patient Solano County, California, February 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(15):472-6. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e5 PMid:32298249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e5

Tian S, Hu N, Lou J, Chen K, Kang X, Xiang Z, et al. Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing. J Infect. 2020;80(4):401-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.018 PMid:32112886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.018

Fernandez AR, Crowe RP, Bourn S, Matt SE, Brown AL, Hawthorn AB, et al. COVID-19 preliminary case series: Characteristics of EMS encounters with linked hospital diagnoses. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021;25(1):16-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2020.1792016 PMid:32677858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2020.1792016

Satty T, Ramgopal S, Elmer J, Mosesso VN, Martin-Gill C. EMS responses and non-transports during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;42:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.078 PMid:33429185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.078

Nolan JP, Monsieurs KG, Bossaert L, Böttiger BW, Greif R, Lott C, et al. European resuscitation council COVID-19 guidelines executive summary. Resuscitation. 2020;153:45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.06.001 PMid:32525022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.06.001

Cabañas JG, Williams JG, Gallagher JM, Brice JH. COVID-19 pandemic: The role of EMS physicians in a community response effort. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021;25(1):8-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2020.1838676 PMid:33074060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2020.1838676

Niu S, Tian S, Lou J, Kang X, Zhang L, Lian H, et al. Clinical characteristics of older patients infected with COVID-19: A descriptive study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;89:104058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104058 PMid:32339960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104058

Maudet L, Sarasin F, Dami F, Carron PN, Pasquier M. Emergency medical services: COVID-19 crisis. Rev Med Suisse. 2020;16(N° 691-2):810-4. PMid:32348041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53738/REVMED.2020.16.691.0810

Penverne Y, Jenvrin J, Montassier E. EMS dispatch center activity during the COVID-19 containment. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;2020:30678-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.083 PMid:32826107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.083

Yang BY, Barnard LM, Emert JM, Drucker C, Schwarcz L, Counts CR, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) receiving emergency medical services in King County, Washington. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e2014549. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14549 PMid:32639570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14549

Saberian P, Conovaloff JL, Vahidi E, Hasani-Sharamin P, Kolivand PH. How the COVID-19 epidemic affected prehospital emergency medical services in Tehran, Iran. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(6):110-6. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48679 PMid:33052824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48679

Ventura C, Gibson C, Collier GD. Emergency Medical Services resource capacity and competency amid COVID-19 in the United States: preliminary findings from a national survey. Heliyon. 2020;6(5):e03900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03900 PMid:32368629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03900

Ienghong K, Kulsutcharit K, Apiratwarakul K, Gaysonsiri D, Mitsungnern T, Bhudhisawasdi V. Characteristics and mortality in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk acute pulmonary embolism patients in the emergency department. J Med Assoc Thai 2020;103(Suppl 6):42-6.

Ienghong K, Ussahgij W, Kanthachat K, Apiratwarakul K, Phungoen P, Bhudhisawasdi V. Factors associated with severe intracranial pathology in acute non-traumatic headache patients in the emergency department. J Med Assoc Thai 2020;103(Suppl 6):47-50.

Apiratwarakul K, Mitsungnern T, Thatphet P, Ienghong K, Ruttanaseeha W, Bhudhisawasdi V. Management of anaphylactic patients by emergency medical services. J Med Assoc Thai 2020;103(Suppl 6):11-4.

Apiratwarakul K, Pumiyoch P, Ienghong K, Phungoen P, Gaysonsiri D, Bhudhisawasdi V. Endotracheal intubation on a stationary vs. moving ambulance. J Med Assoc Thai 2020;103(Suppl 6):18-21.

Apiratwarakul K, Ienghong K, Gaysonsiri D, Buranasakda M, Bhudhisawasdi V, Tiamkao S. Role of motorcycle-based ambulance (motorlance) in major sporting events. J Med Assoc Thai 2020;103(Suppl 6):15-7.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-19

How to Cite

1.
Apiratwarakul K, Suzuki T, Celebi I, Ienghong K, Tangpaisarn T, Tiamkao S, Bhudhisawasdi V. Comparison of Emergency Medical Services Duration amid Routine Service for COVID-19 Patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Apr. 19 [cited 2024 Nov. 25];9(E):289-92. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/5953

Issue

Section

Public Health Education and Training

Categories