Total Penectomy and Perineal Urethrostomy Management of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Paraffinoma in Single Center Hospital: A Rare Case Report

Authors

  • Syaeful Agung Wibowo Department of Surgery, Uro-Oncology Division, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Suharto Wijanarko Department of Surgery, Uro-Oncology Division, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Erwin Aritama Ismail Departement of Surgery, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhammad David Perdana Putra Departement of Surgery, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6012-1160

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5996

Keywords:

Penectomy, Perineostomy, Penile squamous cell carcinoma, Paraffinoma

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penile cancer is a rare condition, affecting less than 1% of the adult male population [1]. The risk of penile cancer increases significantly with age, poor hygiene, and the presence of the prepuce. The most common type encountered is squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Clinically penile cancer appears as small lesions with induration and erythema or as large infiltrative ulcerative lesions. As the disease progresses, complaints such as itching, bleeding, discharge, foul odor, and pain occurred.

CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old man with poor hygiene and has a history of diabetes mellitus had penis ulcers since 5 years ago. On physical examination, an ulcer with the size of 12 × 12 × 10 cm was found growing pus (-). Biopsy had done and confirmed SCC as a result. Pelvic multiple slice CT shows growth covering the entire shaft of the penis down to the base. The patient had a previous history of using silicone injection 35 years ago and causing Sclerofibromatosis. The patient was planned to undergo surgery with clinical diagnosis T4N0M0. Total penectomy was performed with an elliptical incision around the base with a margin of 2 cm. Sclerofibromatosis and the surrounding tissue were excised to the base of the penis followed by perineal urethrostomy. There was no problem postoperatively. The patient went home after staying in the hospital for 96 h. The surgical specimen revealed SCC with free of tumor excision margin.

CONCLUSIONS: Injections with silicone to enlarge the penis cannot be justified. The process can trigger a chronic inflammatory reaction associated with penile malignancy. Total penectomy and wide excision with urethral perineostomy could be optimal initial treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Kiptoon DK, Ngugi PM, Rana FS. Cancer of the penis: Case report. East Afr Med J. 2009;86(4):196-200. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v86i4.46952 PMid:20085006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v86i4.46952

Tanti Y, Muhartono M. A 59 years old man wit penile. J Medula Unila. 2016;5(2):103-7.

Solakhan M, Bulut E. Penile cancer: Case report. Int Arch Urol Complications. 2018;4(2):45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5742/1510045

Silberstein J, Downs T, Goldstein I. Penile injection with silicone: Case report and review of the literature. J Sex Med. 2008;5(9):2231-7. PMid:18657262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00911.x

O’Neill S, Barns M, Vujovic F, Lozinskiy M. The role of penectomy in penile cancer-evolving paradigms. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(6):3191-4. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.08.14 PMid:33457290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.08.14

Dachlan I. Penile granuloma caused by liquid silicone injection. J Med Sci. 2007;39(1):53-8.

Loughlin KR. Surgical management of penile carcinoma: The primary lesion. BJU Int. 2006;97(3):655-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06077.x PMid:16469049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06077.x

Yadav K. Radical penectomy: Procedure details of an uncommonly performed procedure for carcinoma penis and review of literature. Cancer Rep Rev. 2018;2(2):2-2. https://doi.org/10.15761/crr.1000149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15761/CRR.1000149

Shaeer O, Shaeer K. Delayed complications of gel injection for penile girth augmentation. J Sex Med. 2009;6(7):2072-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01262.x PMid:19453922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01262.x

Ghahhari J, Marchioni M, Spiess PE, Chipollini JJ, Nyirády P, Varga J, et al. Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: Results from the PECAD study. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(3):1306-13. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.04 PMid:32676414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.04

Kim HK, Kim BJ, Kim MN, Kim SY, Kim SE, Mun SK, et al. Facial paraffinoma treated with a bipolar radiofrequency device. Int J Dermatol. 2015;54(1):89-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05844.x PMid:24899152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05844.x

Downey AP, Osman NI, Mangera A, Inman RD, Reid SV, Chapple CR. Penile paraffinoma. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(5):894- 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.06.013 PMid:30007541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.06.013

Downloads

Published

2021-05-14

How to Cite

1.
Wibowo SA, Wijanarko S, Ismail EA, Putra MDP. Total Penectomy and Perineal Urethrostomy Management of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Paraffinoma in Single Center Hospital: A Rare Case Report. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 May 14 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];9(C):55-8. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/5996

Issue

Section

Case Report in Surgery

Categories