The Effect of Peer Tutor Model on Antenatal Care Skill Competencies in Learning Laboratory Skills for Students of Langsa Midwifery Study Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5999Keywords:
Peer tutor model, Antenatal care, Skill competenciesAbstract
BACKGROUND: Peer-assisted learning is a student-centered learning method that involves discussions between friends or seniors as teachers and participants as being taught. Realize optimal education; it is necessary to choose the peer tutorial method to increase antenatal care (ANC) skills in laboratory skills.
AIM: This study aims to determine the effect of the learning peer tutor model for laboratory skills on the competence of ANC skills in the Langsa Midwifery Study Program’s first-level students.
METHODS: This study used a pre-experimental approach with a one-group pretest-posttest design without a control group. The population used in this study were all Level I Midwifery Students of Langsa City who occupied the 2nd semester. This study’s sample was taken by purposive sampling as many as 45 respondents – data analysis using bivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The results showed an effect of the peer tutor method on ANC skills’ competence before and after learning laboratory skills as evidenced by a statistical test with a value (p < 0.05), namely, 0.047 < 0.05. The results also showed differences in students’ competence before and after the peer tutoring method was carried out in laboratory skills learning, as evidenced by the results of statistical tests with p < 0.05, namely, 0.000 < 0.05. Peer tutor method learning effectively increases ANC skill competencies in learning laboratory skills for midwifery study students.
CONCLUSION: Peer tutor model effective in improving ANC skills competency in skill learning for midwifery study students.Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
World Bank Group. Maternal and Child Health Profile Statistics Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2015.
Xyrichis A. Interprofessional science: An international field of study reaching maturity. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(1):1-3. PMid:31908186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1707954
Brock D, Abu-Rish E, Chiu CR, Hammer D, Wilson S, Vorvick L, et al. Interprofessional education in team communication: Working together to improve patient safety. Postgrad Med J. 2013;89(1057):642-51. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-000952rep PMid:24129031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-000952rep
Dalton L, Spencer J, Howarth H. Report of the Investigation of Undergraduate Health Science Student Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Education. Hobart: University of Tasmania; 2007.
Aburahma MH, Mohamed HM. Peer teaching as an educational tool in pharmacy schools; fruitful or futile. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017;9(6):1170-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.026 PMid:29233388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.026
Maheady L. In: Peer-assisted learning. In: Topping K, editor. Advantages and disadvantages of peer-assisted learning strategies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998. p. 45-62.
Topping KJ. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. High Educ. 1996;32:321-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00138870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138870
Nestel D, Kidd J. Peer assisted learning in patientcentred interviewing: The impact on student tutors. Med Teach. 2005;27(5):439-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500086813 PMid:16147798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500086813
Sevenhuysen S, Farlie MK, Keating JL, Haines TP, Molloy E. Physiotherapy students and clinical educators perceive several ways in which incorporating peer-assisted learning could improve clinical placements: A qualitative study. J Physiother. 2015;61(2):87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.015 PMid:25801365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.015
Shah I, Mahboob U, Shah S. Effectiveness of horizontal peerassisted learning in physical examination performance. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29(4):559-65. PMid:29330977
Habib SH, Malik MO, Fatima S, Shah I. Evaluation of peer assisted learning in evidence based medicine course: A pilot study at university of glasgow. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29(4):662-6. PMid:29331000
Glynn LG, MacFarlane A, Kelly M, Cantillon P, Murphy AW. Helping each other to learn--a process evaluation of peer assisted learning. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-18 PMid:16524464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-18
Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken SJ, Hill AG. Medical students-as-teachers: A systematic review of peerassisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011;2:157-72. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s14383 PMid:23745087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14383
Ten Cate O, Durning S. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):546-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583816 PMid:17978967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583816
Sahoo S, Venkatesan P, Myint KT, Moe S. Peer-assisted learning activities during undergraduate ophthalmology training: How the medical students of Asia Pacific Region perceive. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2015;4(2):76-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/apo.0000000000000094 PMid:26065348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000094
Bulte C, Betts A, Garner K, Durning S. Student teaching: Views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):583-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583824 PMid:17922356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583824
Burke J, Fayaz S, Graham K, Matthew R, Field M. Peerassisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: A supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):577-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701469867 PMid:17978969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701469867
Nikendei C, Andreesen S, Hoffmann K, Junger J. Cross-year peer tutoring on internal medicine wards: Effects on self-assessed clinical competencies--a group control design study. Med Teach. 2009;31(2):e32-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802464452 PMid:19330661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802464452
Schauseil-Zipf U, Karay Y, Ehrlich R, Knoop K, Michalk D. Peer teaching in paediatrics medical students as learners and teachers on a paediatric course. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27(5):Doc71. PMid:21818216
Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(6):703-16. PMid: 18047577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01954.x
Sobral DT. Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: Conditions and outcomes for student tutors. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1064-70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01308.x PMid:12406267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01308.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Meliani Sukmadewi Harahap, Alchalidi Alchalidi, Baharuddin Baharuddin, Nurlaili Ramli (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0