Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Associated with Different Irrigation Techniques after Removal of Intracanal Medicaments

Authors

  • Shaimaa Nasr El-Din Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr University for Science and Technology, October City, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-2661
  • Magdy M. Ali Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt
  • Reham Hassan Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minya, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6094

Keywords:

Debris extrusion, Max i probe, Passive ultrasonic irrigation, XP-endo Finisher

Abstract

 This study aimed to compare the effect of XP-endo Finisher file (XPF), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional irrigation technique using side-vented needle (SVN) on the amount of apically extruded debris after the removal of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2 and double antibiotic paste (DAP). Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were used. After decronation, all canals were prepared up to the ProTaper Next X4 file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). After dryness, teeth were randomly assigned into 2 groups (n=30) according to the Type of intracanal medication used; Ca(OH)2 and DAP then incubated at 37 °C and 100% humidity. After one week, Samples in each group were randomly assigned to 3 subgroups (n=10) according to the method used for medicament removal: XPF, PUI and SVN. Debris extruded during the removal procedure were collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes then left to dry in an incubator at 37°C for 15 days.  The amount of extruded debris was assessed with an analytical balance and calculated by subtracting the initial weight from the final weight of the tube.  Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test. Results:  there was no statistically significant difference regarding the amount of apically extruded debris after using the three irrigation techniques in removal of both Ca(OH)2 and DAP (P-value = 0.141, Effect size = 0.160) and (P-value = 0.237, Effect size = 0.073) respectively. Conclusions:  Neither XPF nor PUI increase the risk of intracanal medicament extrusion beyond the apex.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: Shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):30-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x

Peters OA, Sch€onenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques onroot canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001;34(3):221-30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00373.x PMid:12193268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00373.x

Kawashima N, Wadachi R, Suda H, Yeng T, Parashos P. Root canal medicaments. Int Dent J. 2009;59(1):5-11. PMid:19323305

Ionescu A, Harris D, Selvaganapathy PR, Kishen A. Electrokinetic transport and distribution of antibacterial nanoparticles for endodontic disinfection. Int Endod J. 2020;53(8):1120-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13321

Shin JM, Luo T, Lee KH, Guerreiro D, Botero TM, McDonald NJ, et al. Deciphering endodontic microbial communities by next-generation sequencing. J Endod. 2018;44(7):1080-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.003 PMid:29861065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.003

Taneja S, Kumari M. Use of triple antibiotic paste in the treatment of large periradicular lesions. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012;3(1):72-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1626.2011.00082.x PMid:22298525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1626.2011.00082.x

Sabrah AH, Yassen GH, Liu WC, Goebel WS, Gregory RL, Platt JA. The effect of diluted triple and double antibiotic pastes on dental pulp stem cells and established Enterococcus faecalis biofilm .Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(8):2059-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1423-6 PMid:25689981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1423-6

Yucel AC, Gurel M, Guler E, Karabucak B. Comparison of final irrigation techniques in removal of calcium hydroxide. Aust Endod J. 2013;39(3):116-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2011.00326.x PMid:24279657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2011.00326.x

Hosoya N, Kurayama H, Iino F, Arai T. Effects of calcium hydroxide on physical and sealing properties of canal sealers. Int Endod J. 2004;37(3):178-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00781.x PMid:15009407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00781.x

Arslan H, Akcay M, Capar ID, Saygili G, Gok T, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of irrigation using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, ultrasonic, sonic and needle techniques in removing calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J. 2015;48(3):246-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12306 PMid:24786363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12306

Wigler R, Dvir R, Weisman A, Matalon S, Kfir A. Efficacy of XP-endo finisher file in the removal of calcium hydroxide paste from artificial standardized groove in the apical third of oval root canals. Int Endod J. 2010;43(9):763-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12668

Tanalp J, Gungor T. Apical extrusion of debris: A literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2014;47(3):211-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12137 PMid:23711187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12137

Hülsmann M, Rödig T, Nordmeyer S. Complications during root canal irrigation. Endod Top. 2009;16:27-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2009.00237.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2009.00237.x

Al-Garni S, Al-Sharani S, Al-Nazhan S, Al-Maflehi N. Evaluation of calcium hydroxide removal using EndoActivator system: An in vitro study. Saudi Endod J. 2014;4(1):13-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-5984.127981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-5984.127981

Gawdat S, El Asfouri H. Comparison of the effect of XP-endo Finisher file, passive ultrasonic irrigation and conventional syringe irrigation on the apical extrusion of debris. Egypt Dent J. 2016;62(10):5107-14. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.24008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.24008

Myers GL, Montgomery S. Comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and canal master techniques. J Endod. 1991;17(6):275-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81866-2 PMid:1940753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81866-2

FKG XP-Endo Finisher; 2016. Available from: http://www.fkg.ch/sites/default/files/201607_fkg_xps_brochure_en_web.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 19].

Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Langedijk J, Wesselink P, van der Sluis LW. The influence of the ultrasonic intensity on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation. J Endod. 2011;37(5):688-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.004 PMid:21496672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.004

Arora C, Bahri R, Mittal N. Comparative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using, Protaper retreatment file, K3 file and H-file with solvent in endodontic retreatment. Saudi Endod J. 2012;2(3):136-41. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-5984.112706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-5984.112706

Siqueira JF, Rocas IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, et al. Incidence of postoperative pain after intraca-nal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod. 2002;28(6):457-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00010 PMid:12067129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00010

Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016;49(3):255-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12452 PMid:25816688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12452

Gummadi A, Panchajanya S, Ashwathnarayana S, Santhosh L, Jaykumar T, Shetty A. Apical extrusion of debris following the use of single-file rotary/reciprocating systems, combined with syringe or ultrasonically-facilitated canal irrigation. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(4):351-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_14_19 PMid:31802818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_14_19

Elmsallati EA, Wadachi R, Suda H. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: A pilot study. Aust Endod J. 2009;35(2):65-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2008.00128.x PMid:19703077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2008.00128.x

Shuping GB, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod. 2000;26(12):751-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00022 PMid:11471648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00022

Marending M, Stark WJ, Brunner TJ, Fischer J, Zehnder M. Comparative assessment of time-related bioactive glass and calcium hydroxide effects on mechanical properties of human root dentin. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25(1):126-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00735.x PMid:19208025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00735.x

Topçuoğlu HS, Aktı A, Tuncay Ö, Dinçer AN, Düzgün S, Topçuoğlu G. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. J Endod. 2014;40(12):2066-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.004 PMid:25443282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.004

Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, Wesselink PR, et al. The effect of needle-insertion depth on the irrigant flow in the root canal: evaluation using an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. J Endod. 2010;36(10):1664-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.023 PMid:20850673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.023

Hamdan R, Michetti J, Pinchon D, Diemer F, Georgelin-Gurgel M. The XP-Endo Finisher for the removal of calcium hydroxide paste from root canals and from the apical third. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(7):e855-60. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53962 PMid:28828150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53962

Dos Reis S, Cruz VM, Duarte MA, da Silveira Bueno CE, Vivan RR, Pelegrine RA, et al. Volumetric analysis of irrigant extrusion in immature teeth after different final agitation techniques. J Endod. 2020;46(5):682-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.014 PMid:32139265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.014

Khan S, Niu LN, Eid AA, Looney SW, Didato A, Roberts S, et al. Periapical pressures developed by nonbinding irrigation needles at various irrigation delivery rates. J Endod. 2013;39(4):529-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.001 PMid:23522551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.001

Tambe VH, Nagmode PS, Vishwas JR, P SK, Angadi P, Ali FM. Evaluation of the amount of debris extruded apically by using conv-entional syringe, endovac and ultrasonic irrigation technique: An in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(3):63-6. PMid:24155604

Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C, Kastrinakis E, Vasiliadis L. Effect of needle insertion depth and root canal curvature on irrigant extrusion ex vivo. J Endod. 2013;39(4):521-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.018 PMid:23522549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.018

Keskin C, Güler DH, Sarıyılmaz E. Effect of intracanal time of triple antibiotic paste on its removal from simulated immature roots using passive ultrasonic irrigation and XP-endo finisher. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12(4):288-93. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.045 PMid:30774796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.045

Downloads

Published

2021-08-20

How to Cite

1.
El-Din SN, Ali MM, Hassan R. Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Associated with Different Irrigation Techniques after Removal of Intracanal Medicaments. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Aug. 20 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];9(D):120-5. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/6094

Issue

Section

Prosthodontics

Categories