Evaluation of Cements Curing Modes Regarding Microleakage During Cementation of E-max Laminate Veneers

Waleed Alqahtani; Rami Mohammed Galal; Ghada Hamza

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2021.6141

Authors

Waleed Alqahtani Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-3049
Rami Mohammed Galal Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, AlNahda University, Beni Suef, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0773-1917
Ghada Hamza Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-5402

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6141

Keywords:

Curing modes, Cements, E-max veneers

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the curing modes of two adhesive resin cements (Light cure mode of the Variolink Veneer, the self-cure mode and dual cure mode of the Multilink Automix) on the marginal leakage of lithium disilicate ceramic laminate veneers. Methods: A total number of forty eight extracted natural central incisors were prepared to receive ceramic laminate veneers, constructed using E-max ceramic divided into three groups cemented using three curing modes of two adhesive resin cements {light-cure mode of Variolink Veneer, self-cure mode of Multilink Automix and dual-cure mode of Multilink Automix adhesive resin cements} . Die penetration test was done using the methylene blue stain {qualitative assessment} for testing the die penetration along the tooth/ceramic interface. Results: Descriptive statistical analysis revealed that the self-curing mode recorded the significantly least degree of leakage compared to the light and dual cure modes. The self-cure mode recorded (0.1±0.3) which was significantly lower than light cure (1.2 ±0.9) and dual cure mode (1.2 ±0.4), there was no statistical significant difference between the later two curing modes. The self-cure mode of the resin cement is considered a more effective method for having the least marginal leakage at the tooth/ceramic interface. There was no difference between the light cure mode and the dual cure mode.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin North Am. 1983;27(4):671-84. PMid:6360727

Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000;28(3):163-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00066-4 PMid:10709338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4

Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers bonded to tooth structure: an ultra-morphological FE-SEM examination of the adhesive interface. Dent Mater. 1999;15(2):105-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00020-2 PMid:10551102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00020-2

Gorman CM, McDevitt WE, Hill RG. Comparison of two heat-pressed all-ceramic dental materials. Dent Mater. 2000;16(6):389-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00031-2 PMid:10967187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00031-2

Zaimoglu A, Karaagaclioglu L, Uctasli. Influence of porcelain material and composite luting resin on microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19(4):319-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01574.x Mid:1432348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01574.x

Elkomy M, El-Guindy J, Taymour M. Color stability of EMAX CAD laminate veneers cemented with light cure versus dual cure amine free adhesive resin cement (randomized controlled clinical trial). Egypt Dent J. 2019;65(1469):1475. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2019.72571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2019.72571

Strazzi-Sahyon BH, Rocha EP, Assunção WG, Dos Santos PH. Role of adhesive systems on the luting interface’s thickness of ceramic laminate veneers. Braz Oral Res 2020;34:e063. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0063 PMid:32609232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0063

Atsu SS, Aka PS, Kucukesmen HC, Kilicarslan MA, Atakan C. Age-related changes in tooth enamel as measured by electron microscopy: Implications for porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(4):336-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.008 PMid:16198170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.008

Walls AW, Steele JG, Wassell RW. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: Porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J. 2002;193(2):73-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801489 PMid:12199127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801489

Poorisawatpong T, Eiampongpaiboon T, Kuphasuk C. The effect of curing methods for dental adhesive on microleakage and marginal adaptation of porcelain laminate veneer. M Dent J. 2019;39(3):213-22.

Haralur SB. Microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers cemented with different bonding techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(2):e166-71. Mid:29670735

Kumari N, Nandeeshwar DB. The dimensional accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using two different impression techniques: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthod Soc. 2015;15(3):211-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.158074 PMid:26929515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.158074

Bott B, Hannig M. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro. Dent Mater. 2003;19(4):264-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00038-6 PMid:12686289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00038-6

Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: Marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater. 2008;24(2):185-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.003 Mid:17544101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.003

Ibarra G, Johnson GH, Geurtsen W, Vargas MA. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement. Dent Mater. 2007;23(2):218-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.013 PMid:16499961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.013

Hana H, Shimadab Y, Sadr A, Tagami J, Kume KY, Park SH. Effect of pretreatment and activation mode on the interfacial adaptation of nanoceramic resin inlay and self-adhesive resin cement. Dent Mater. 2020;36(9):1170-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.05.005 PMid:32536587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.05.005

Haralur SB. Microleakage of porcelain laminate veneer cemented with different bonding techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(2):e166-71. PMid:29670735

Novais VR, Raposo LH, de Miranda RR, de Carvalho Almança Lopes C, Simamoto PC Jr., Soares CJ. Degree of conversion and bond strength of resin-cements to feldspathic ceramic using different curing modes. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(1):61-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-77572016-0221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-77572016-0221