Comparison of the Unilateral and the Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation without Using an Interbody Cage: Randomized Clinical Trial

Alexey Lychagin; Vadim Cherepanov; Marina Lipina; Ivan Vyazankin

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2021.6151

Authors

Alexey Lychagin Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-8149
Vadim Cherepanov Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
Marina Lipina Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1240-4064
Ivan Vyazankin Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8020-2950

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6151

Keywords:

Instability, Unilateral fixation, Bilateral, Lumbar spine, Posterior stabilization

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spine instability is one of the main causes of low back pain and has become more prevalent in recent years. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation is used to perform posterior lumbar stabilization, which is complemented by the installation of an interbody cage.

AIM: The aim of the study was evaluating of the results of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation without using of an interbody cage.

METHODS: A prospective randomized study of 96 patients was carried out. Forty-seven patients were assigned to the group of the unilateral pedicle screw fixation versus 49 patients were moved to the group of the bilateral pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Of the 96 patients, 80 patients eventually were included in the study. However, seven patients in the first group and nine patients were lost to follow-up. Surgery timing, blood loss volume, clinical outcomes (scores on the Oswestry disability index [ODI], EQ-5D and visual analogue scale [VAS]) were evaluated in 6–12 months after surgical treatment. All the patients included in this study underwent functional and control computed tomography in 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS: Both groups showed a significant improvement in VAS, EQ-5D, and ODI in 1 year after surgical treatment. The two groups significantly differed in the surgery timing (unilateral – 90.2 min; and bilateral – 129.4 min) and blood loss volume (unilateral – 152.7 ml; and bilateral – 230.1 ml), p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation showed similar clinical results, while results in both types of fixation differed in slight manner. However, the duration of surgical treatment and intraoperative blood loss volume proved to be lower for the unilateral fixation group, which indicates that the use of the unilateral fixation can be the choice of performing posterior stabilization at a single-level instability of the spine without using an interbody cage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Chan AY, Lien BV, Choi EH, Chan AK, Hanna G, Lopez AM, et al. Back pain outcomes after minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(3):E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.6.focus20385 PMid:32871569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20385

Inoue D, Shigematsu H, Nakagawa Y, Takeshima T, Tanaka Y. The influence of posture on instability evaluation using flexion-extension X-ray imaging in lumbar spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2020 Sep 22. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0124 PMid:32951403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0124

Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(11):2265-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2281-4 PMid:22453894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2281-4

Liu H, Xu Y, Yang SD, Wang T, Wang H, Liu FY, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(21):e6882. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000006882 PMid:28538379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006882

Muthu S, Chellamuthu G. How safe is unilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar fusion surgery for management of 2-level lumbar degenerative disorders compared with bilateral pedicle screw fixation? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:357-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.078 PMid:32428724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.078

Huang P, Wang Y, Xu J, Xiao B, Liu J, Che L, et al. Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease: Surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0606-z PMid:28728587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0606-z

Du JY, Kiely PD, Al Maaieh M, Aichmair A, Huang RC. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of adjacent segment disease: A preliminary report. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(3):330-7. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.06.17 PMid:29057340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.06.17

Liu YY, Xiao J, Jin HJ Wang Z, Yin X, Liu MY, et al. Comparison of unilateral and bilateral polymethylmethacrylate-augmented cannulated pedicle screw fixation for the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):446. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01975-1 PMid:32993741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01975-1

Joseph JR, Smith BW, La Marca F, Park P. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(4):E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.focus15278 PMid:26424344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15278

Luo P, Shao RX, Wu AM, Xu HZ, Chi YL, Lin Y. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw and contralateral percutaneous transfacet screw fixation for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disorders. Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26(5):763-70. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.12450-14.1 PMid:27438624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.12450-14.1

Soriano-Sánchez JA, Quillo-Olvera J, Soriano-Solis S, Soriano- Lopez ME, Covarrubias-Rosas CA, Quillo-Reséndiz J, et al. A prospective clinical study comparing MI-TLIF with unilateral versus bilateral transpedicular fixation in low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(1):16-22. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.03.04 PMid:28435913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.03.04

Duncan JW, Bailey RA. An analysis of fusion cage migration in unilateral and bilateral fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(2):439-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2458-x PMid:22878377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2458-x

Randelli P, Arrigoni P, Lubowitz JH, Cabitza P, Denti M. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(7):834-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.01.011 PMid:18589273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.01.011

Posner I, White AA 3rd, Edwards WT, Hayes WC. A biomechanical analysis of the clinical stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7(4):374-89. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198207000-00008 PMid:7135070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198207000-00008

Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Carreon LY, Campbell MJ, Puno RM, Johnson JR. Initial fusion rates with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/compression resistant matrix and a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate/ collagen carrier in posterolateral spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(15):1694-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000172157.39513.80 PMid:16094268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000172157.39513.80

Li X, Lv C, Yan T. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar diseases: A meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:782-90. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.892593 PMid:25774950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892593

Shen X, Wang L, Zhang H, Gu X, Gu G, He S. Radiographic analysis of single level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(1):E1-8. PMid:24189485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000042

Zhao Y, Yang S, Ding W. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar fusion: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226848. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226848 PMid:31860651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226848

Fernández-Fairen M, Sala P, Ramírez H, Gil J. A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(4):395-401. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000255023.56466.44 PMid:17304127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000255023.56466.44

Ren C, Qin R, Sun P, Wang P. Effectiveness and safety of unilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137(4):441-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2641-y PMid:28168642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2641-y

Phan K, Leung V, Scherman DB, Tan AR, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ. Bilateral versus unilateral instrumentation in spinal surgery: Systematic review and trial sequential analysis of prospective studies. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;30:15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.013 PMid:27068653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.013

Lu P, Pan T, Dai T, Chen G, Shi KQ. Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: A meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1004-x PMid:30466462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1004-x

Liu F, Feng Z, Zhou X, Liang Y, Jiang C, Li X, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A monocentric study of 215 patients with a minimum of 4-year follow-up. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(6):E776-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000416 PMid:27404853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000416

Li J, Wang W, Zuo R, Zhou Y. Biomechanical stability before and after graft fusion with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation: Finite element study. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:e228-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.141 PMid:30481621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.141

Fukushima M, Oshima Y, Yuzawa Y, Tanaka S, Inanami H. Clinical and radiographic analysis of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented one-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3105. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59706-9 PMid:32080245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59706-9

Molinari RW, Saleh A, Molinari R Jr., Hermsmeyer J, Dettori JR. Unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in spinal surgery: A systematic review. Glob Spine J. 2015;5(3):185-94. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1552986 PMid:26131385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1552986

Gao ZY, Qin J, Kang J, Song H, He XJ, Li HP, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): A meta analysis. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016;29(10):954-62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-87 PMid:29285916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-87