Repercussion of Conventional Complete Mandibular Denture Versus Single Implant Over-Denture on Retention and Biting Force
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6769Keywords:
Complete denture, Implant supported overdenture, Retention, Biting forceAbstract
Aim: Aim of this study was the evaluate the retention and biting force of conventional complete denture and after placement of a single implant in the mandible for an implant retained over-denture
Material and methods
Eight completely edentulous patients were selected. A single implant was inserted at the symphysis of the mandible and left to osseointergrate. During the osseointegration period a conventional complete denture was fabricated and inserted. Retention and biting force was measured at insertion and after 3 months of service. After osseointegration attachment was connected, space was formed in the fitting surface of the existing mandibular denture and retention silicon was placed. Retention and biting force were measured at insertion and after 3 months follow-up. Data were collected and statistically analyzed.
Results:
The retention mean values for the complete denture was 2.420±0.360, however the retention mean values for the single implant over-denture was 6.395±0.289. F=3.80 with statically significance difference between the groups of P <0.01. The biting force mean values for the complete denture was 52.62±2.71, however the biting force mean values for single implant over-denture was 71.45±2.73. F= 1.790 with statically insignificance difference between the groups of P >0.01
Conclusion:
Single implant overdenture improved the retention and the biting force when compared with the complete denture, this has improved the quality of life and happiness.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Patel U, Walmsley D. Implant-supported mandibular denture: Planning to delivery, a case report. Dental. 2014;41:137-40, 142-3. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2014.41.2.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2014.41.2.137
McCord J, Grant A. Identification of complete denture problems: A summary. Br Dent J. 2000;189(3):128-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800703a PMid:11041628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800703a
Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2000;11:108-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1108.x PMid:11168261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x
Feine J, Exley C, Naert I, Ellis JS. Mandibular two implantsupported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients-the york consensus statement. Nat Publ Gr. 2009;207:185-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728
Bryant SR, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures. J Dent Res. 2014;94:36-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514554224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514554224
Leles CR, Nogueira T, Hartmann R, Leles JL. The Single-tooth Implant-retained Overdenture: A Less Invasive Approach to Improve the Conventional Mandibular Denture. 50 Years of Osseointegration: Reflections and Perspectives. Brazil: VM Cultural; 2015. p. 73.
Limpuangthip N, Somkotra T, Arksornnukit M. Impacts of denture retention and stability on oral health-related quality of life, general health, and happiness in elderly Thais. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2019;2019:3830267. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3830267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3830267
Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, Van Der Bilt A, Van ‘T Hof MA, Witter DJ, Kalk W, et al. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res. 2000;79(7):1519-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790071501 PMid:11005738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790071501
Hatch JP, Shinkai RS, Sakai S, Rugh JD, Paunovich ED. Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46:641-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00023-1 PMid:11369319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(01)00023-1
Ikebe K, Nokubi T, Morii K, Kashiwagi J, Furuya M. Association of bite force with ageing and occlusal support in older adults. J Dent. 2005;33(2):131-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.09.002 PMid:15683894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.09.002
Cheng T, Ma LI, Liu XL, Sun GF, He XJ, Huo JY, et al. Use of a single implant to retain mandibular overdenture: A preliminary clinical trial of 13 cases. J Dent Sci. 2012;7(3):261-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.02.001
Feine JS, Lund JP. Measuring chewing ability in randomized controlled trials with edentulous populations wearing implant prostheses. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(4):301-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01614.x PMid:16629885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01614.x
Rismanchian M, Bajoghli F, Mostajeran Z, Fazel A, Eshkevari P. Sadr effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(4):196-200. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336-35.4.196 PMid:19813425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336-35.4.196
Rosa LB. Bite force and masticatory efficiency in individuals with different oral rehabilitations. Open J Stomatol. 2012;2:21-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2012.21004
Wafa’a R, Abbas NA, Amer AA, Abdelkader AA, Bahgat B. Biting force and muscle activity in implant-supported single mandibular overdentures opposing fixed maxillary dentition. Implant Dent. 2016;25(2):199-203. https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000374 PMid:26684910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000374
van Kampen FM, van der Bilt A, Cune MS, Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Bosman F. Masticatory function with implant-supported overdentures. J Dent Res. 2004;83(9):708-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300910 PMid:15329377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300910
Ebrahim E, Abdel-Fattah A, Kabee S. The effect of two different denture base materials on retention of complete denture in severely resorbed lower ridge cases. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls. 2016;3(4):287-92. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2016.5182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2016.5182
Niedermeier W. Das poller-teleskop nach drei Jahren klinischer Bewährung. Z Zahnärztl Impl. 2003;19:99-106.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ahmed N. Elsherbini, Wilhelm Niedermeier (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0