Evaluation of Anatomy Course Teaching and Learning Outcomes for Iraqi Pharmacy Students: Internet-based Learning versus Blended Learning During the Pandemic

Authors

  • Sinan Farhan Department of Anesthesia Techniques, College of Medical Science Technology, University of Mashreq, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Ahmed Al-Imam Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq; Department of Computer Science and Statistics, PUMS Doctoral School, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland; Alumni Ambassador, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Marek A. Motyka Department of Social Work, Institute of Sociological Sciences, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6771

Keywords:

Academies and institutes, Anatomy, Coronavirus disease-19, Internet, Learning, Medical education, Pandemic, Pharmacy students, Severe acute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Academic courses of human anatomy need to be reviewed periodically by students to ensure better learning outcomes, especially when the teaching process became internet-dependent during the pandemic.

AIM: Our study aims to explore pharmacy students’ opinions concerning the theoretical and practical elements of the anatomy course taught in the College of Pharmacy at Al-Rafidain University.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ethical committee of the College of Pharmacy at Al-Rafidain University approved the study. We prepared a questionnaire (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.735) to evaluate the positive and negative aspects of the teaching process. The questionnaire was presented as an online survey to pharmacy students (n = 305) who finished their anatomy course in two learning modalities, Internet-based learning (n1 = 105, 34.43%) and blended learning (BL) (n2 = 200, 65.57%).

RESULTS: Participants of both groups were satisfied with the syllabus, using internet-based materials, and problem-based learning concerning the theoretical aspect of the course. Concerning practical knowledge, both groups preferred using cadavers instead of dummies, and they verified the beneficial effect of online educational materials and computer-based applications. Pharmacy students demanded more than one anatomy course, while students from the BL group considered the anatomy course duration insufficient. Concerning the practical knowledge, students’ marks were superior for students using BL, and the opposite was the case with theoretical knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS: BL is favored by Iraqi undergraduate pharmacy students; perhaps, it is attributed to the lively interaction between students and the teaching staff. We conclude that internet resources can be supportive of the classical teaching of anatomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Guimarães B, Dourado L, Tsisar S, Diniz JM, Madeira MD, Ferreira MA. Rethinking anatomy: How to overcome challenges of medical Education’s evolution. Acta Med Port. 2017;30(2):134-40. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.8404 PMid:28527481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.8404

Jamie K. The pharmacy gaze: Bodies in pharmacy practice. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(8):1141-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12157 PMid:25091983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12157

Boyce EG, Lawson LA. Preprofessional curriculum in preparation for doctor of pharmacy educational programs. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(8):155. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7308155 PMid:20221348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7308155

Rathbone A, Nazar H, Harburn J, Todd A, Husband AK. Exploring undergraduate pharmacy student experiences of learning human anatomy using cadaveric specimens. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(8):7103. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7103 PMid:31831899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7103

Majumder MA. Issues and priorities of medical education research in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2004;33(2):257-63. PMid:15098645

Brisbourne MA, Chin SS, Melnyk E, Begg DA. Using web‐based animations to teach histology. Anat Rec. 2002;269(1):11-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.10054 PMid:11891621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.10054

Garrett BM, Callear D. The value of intelligent multimedia simulation for teaching clinical decision-making skills. Nurse Educ Today. 2001;21(5):382-90. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0568 PMid:11403585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0568

Granger NA, Calleson DC, Henson OW, Juliano E, Wineski L, Mcdaniel MD, et al. Use of web‐based materials to enhance anatomy instruction in the health sciences. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006;289(4):121-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.b.20104 PMid:16865700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.b.20104

Rizzolo LJ, Aden M, Stewart WB. Correlation of web usage and exam performance in a human anatomy and development course. Clin Anat. 2002;15(5):351-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10045 PMid:12203379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10045

Motyka MA, Al-Imam A, Aljarshawi MH. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as an anomie. Przestrzeń Społeczna. 2020;20:111-44.

Merton RK. Social Structure and Anomie. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2017. p. 3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351157803-1

Teymoori A, Jetten J, Bastian B, Ariyanto A, Autin F, Ayub N, et al. Revisiting the measurement of anomie. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158370. PMid:27383133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158370

Rao KH, Rao RH. Perspectives in medical education 8. Enhancing preclinical education in Japan with a clinically focused, interactive anatomy curriculum. Keio J Med. 2009;58(4):210-5. PMid:20037284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.58.210

Snelgrove H, Familiari G, Gallo P, Gaudio E, Lenzi A, Ziparo V, et al. The challenge of reform: 10 years of curricula change in Italian medical schools. Med Teach. 2009;31(12):1047-55. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903178506 PMid:19995166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903178506

Edgren G, Haffling AC, Jakobsson UL, Mcaleer S, Danielsen N. Comparing the educational environment (as measured by DREEM) at two different stages of curriculum reform. Med Teach. 2010;32(6):e233-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421591003706282 PMid:20515368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01421591003706282

Kim KJ, Kee C. Reform of medical education in Korea. Med Teach. 2010;32(2):113-7. PMid:20163225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903197043

Ngan OM, Tang TL, Chan AK, Chen DM, Tang MK. Blended learning in anatomy teaching for non-medical students: An innovative approach to the health professions education. Health Prof Educ. 2018;4(2):149-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.11.001

Limpach AL, Bazrafshan P, Turner PD, Monaghan MS. Effectiveness of human anatomy education for pharmacy students via the internet. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(6):145. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7206145 PMid:19325961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7206145

Hoffmann D, Swailes N. GRISTO: An integrated learning experience in gross anatomy and histology for dental students, learning outcomes and student perspectives on curriculum change (532.4). FASEB J. 2014;28:532-4. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.532.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.532.4

Singh K, Bharatha A, Sa B, Adams OP, Majumder MA. Teaching anatomy using an active and engaging learning strategy. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1590-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1590-2

Zand A, Abbaszadeh HA, Abdolahifar M, Aghaee AA, Amini A, Mastery FR. Role of E-learning in teaching anatomical sciences. Anat Sci. 2016;13(1):55-60.

Kang SH, Shin JS, Hwang YI. The use of specially designed tasks to enhance student interest in the cadaver dissection laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(2):76-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1251 PMid:22143981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1251

Darras KE, Spouge R, Hatala R, Nicolaou S, Hu J, Worthington A, et al. Integrated virtual and cadaveric dissection laboratories enhance first year medical students’ anatomy experience: A pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):366. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1806-5 PMid:31590672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1806-5

Saltarelli AJ, Roseth CJ, Saltarelli WA. Human cadavers vs. multimedia simulation: A study of student learning in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(5):331-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1429 PMid:24415563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1429

Mustafa AG, Taha NR, Alshboul OA, Alsalem M, Malki ME. Using YouTube to learn anatomy: Perspectives of Jordanian medical students. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6861416. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6861416 PMid:32337267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6861416

Kelsey AH, McCulloch V, Gillingwater TH, Findlater GS, Paxton JZ. Anatomical sciences at the University of Edinburgh: Initial experiences of teaching anatomy online. Transl Res Anat. 2020;19:100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2020.100065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2020.100065

Zargaran A, Turki MA, Bhaskar J, Spiers HV, Zargaran D. The role of technology in anatomy teaching: Striking the right balance. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:259-66. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s240150 PMid:32280294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S240150

Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Anna Anat. 2016;208:151-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010 PMid:26996541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010

Tam MD, Hart AR, Williams S, Heylings D, Leinster S. Is learning anatomy facilitated by computer-aided learning? A review of the literature. Med Teach. 2009;31(9):e393-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802650092 PMid:19811174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802650092

Al-Imam A, Sahai A, Al-Derzi AR, Al-Shalchy A, Abdullah F. All models are wrong, but some are useful: On the non-bayesian statistical robustness of Hilton’s law. Eur J Anat. 2020;24(1):75-8.

Al-Imam A, Abdul-Wahaab IT, Konuri VK, Sahai A, Al-Shalchy AK. Unification of frequentist inference and machine learning for pterygomaxillary morphometrics. Folia Morphol. 2021;80(3):625-41. https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.a2020.0149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2020.0149

Al-Imam A. Optimizing linear models via sinusoidal transformation for boosted machine learning in medicine. J Fac Med Baghdad. 2019;61(3-4):128-36.

Al-Imam A. A novel method for computationally efficacious linear and polynomial regression analytics of big data in medicine. Mod Appl Sci. 2020;14(5):1-10. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v14n5p1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v14n5p1

University of Oxford. The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2021. Available from: https://www.cebm.net. [Last accessed on 2021 Apr 25].

Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LM, Gill H, Phan L, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001 PMid:32799105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001

Kene P. Mental health implications of the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Psychol Trauma. 2020;12(6):585-7. PMid:32757578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000750

Miller JM, Blumstein A. Crime, justice and the COVID- 19 pandemic: Toward a national research agenda. Am J Crim Justice. 2020;45(4):515-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09555-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09555-z

Javed B, Sarwer A, Soto EB, Mashwani ZU. The Coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic’s impact on mental health. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020;35(5):993-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3008 PMid:32567725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3008

Khan S, Siddique R, Xiaoyan W, Zhang R, Nabi G, Afzal MS, et al. Mental health consequences of infections by coronaviruses including severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). Brain Behav. 2021;11(2):e01901. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1901/v2/response1 PMid:33314732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/BRB3.1901/v2/response1

Passavanti M, Argentieri A, Barbieri DM, Lou B, Wijayaratna K, Mirhosseini AS, et al. The psychological impact of COVID- 19 and restrictive measures in the world. J Affect Disord. 2021;283:36-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.020

PMid:33516085

Al-Imam A, Khalid U, Al-Doori HJ. Predictive epidemiology for SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Iraq. Asian J Med Sci. 2021;12(3):121-4. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v12i3.33402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v12i3.33402

Al-Imam A, Khalid U, Al-Doori HJ. Clustering analysis of Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Asian J Med Sci. 2021;12(2):108-13.

Worldometer. COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic; 2021. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus. [Last accessed on 2021 Sep 08]. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v12i2.33401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v12i2.33401

Downloads

Published

2021-09-19

How to Cite

1.
Farhan S, Al-Imam A, Motyka MA. Evaluation of Anatomy Course Teaching and Learning Outcomes for Iraqi Pharmacy Students: Internet-based Learning versus Blended Learning During the Pandemic. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 19 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];9(A):782-8. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/6771