Effectiveness of Aerator Ventures, Deposition with Magnets, Filtering, and Ion Exchange in One Unit against Reduction of Iron, Total Dissolved Solid, and Marine Well Water

Dwi Sudiarto; Nurhayati Nurhayati; Fajriansyah Fajriansyah

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2021.6986

Authors

Dwi Sudiarto Department of Environmental Health, Polytechnic of Health, Ministry of Health, Aceh, Indonesia
Nurhayati Nurhayati Department of Nursing, Polytechnic of Health, Ministry of Health, Aceh, Indonesia
Fajriansyah Fajriansyah Department of Environmental Health, Polytechnic of Health, Ministry of Health, Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6986

Keywords:

Aerator ventures, Depositon with magnets, Filtering and ion exchange

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is known the effectiveness of a venturi aerator, deposition with a sand filter magnet and ion exchange in one unit to reduce Fe content, total dissolved solid (TDS) and saltiness (CL content) in clean water, and the ability of ion exchange to reduce CL content is known.

AIM: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of venturi aerator, magnetic sedimentation, filtration, and ion exchange in one unit against Fe, TDS, and CL well water.

METHODS: The method used is a quasi-experimental method using aeration with a venturi system, deposition with magnets, filtration, and ion exchange. The population in this study was all water containing Fe and CL in the Darul Kamal sub-district, Aceh Besar. The sample in this study is part of the population following research needs.

RESULTS: The results showed an effect of a venturi aerator, deposition with magnets, filtering sea sand, anion, and cation resins in one unit to decrease Fe content and did not affect decreasing TDS content and Salinity. Moreover, a venturi aerator has an effect, deposition with magnets, filtering sea sand, anion, and cation resins in one unit on the decrease in Fe content, TDS, and salinity at deposition time of 24 h. Venturi aerator’s effect on Fe reduction does not affect TDS and CL of well water. There is an effect of venturi aerator and precipitation with magnets, in one unit on Fe reduction, and does not affect TDS and CL of well water. There is an effect of venturi aerator, precipitation with magnets, filtration in one unit on Fe reduction, no effect on TDS, and CL of well water.

CONCLUSION: This tool effectively reduces Fe content and effectively reduces Fe, TDS, and salinity at a 24 h deposition time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Hasan M. Water and Food Security. Water Resources Information Media. Public Communication Section, Sub-Directorate of Data and Information, Directorate of Development Water Resources Program of the Ministry of Public Works; 2012.

Rooswiadji TA. Information Media for Drinking Water and Sanitation. 4th ed. Jakarta, Indonesia; 2012.

Chen KL, Mylon SE, Elimelech M. Aggregation kinetics of alginate-coated hematite nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolytes. Ilmu Teknol Lingkungan. 2006;40(5):1516-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es0518068

Alp E, Melching CS. Allocation of supplementary aeration stations in the Chicago waterway system for dissolved oxygen improvement. J Environ Manage. 2011;92(6):1577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.014 PMid:21310524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.014

Buscaglia GC, Bombardelli FA, Garcı́a MH. Numerical modeling of large-scale bubble plumes accounting for mass transfer effects. Int J Multiph Flow. 2002;28(11):1763-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9322(02)00075-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00075-7

Zhang Z, Zeng Y, Kusiak A. Minimizing pump energy in a wastewater processing plant. Energy. 2002;47(1):505-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.048

Brandt M, Middleton R, Wheale G, Schulting F. Energy efficiency in the water industry, a global research project. Water Pract Technol. 2011;6(2):wpt2011028. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2011.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2011.028

Rosso D, Stenstrom MK, Larson LE. Aeration of large-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants: State of the art. Water Sci Technol. 2008;57(7):973-8. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.218 PMid:18441421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.218

Simpson A, Ranade VV. Modeling hydrodynamic cavitation in venturi: Influence of venturi configuration on inception and extent of cavitation. AIChE J. 2019;65(1):421-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16411

Zahradnik J, Fialova M, Linek V, Sinkule J, Řezníčková J, Kaštánek F. Dispersion efficiency of ejector-type gas distributors in different operating modes. Chem Eng Sci. 1997;52(24):4499-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(97)00294-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00294-7

Liu A, Ming J, Ankumah RO. Nitrate contamination in private wells in rural Alabama, United States. Sci Tot Environ. 2005;346(1-3):112-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.019 Mid:15993687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.019

Charles FH, Swartz CH, Badruzzaman AB, Nicole KB, Yu W, Ali A, et al. Groundwater arsenic contamination on the Ganges Delta: Biogeochemistry, hydrology, human perturbations and human suffering on a large scale. C R Geosci. 2005;337(1/2):285-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2004.10.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2004.10.015

Ghrefat H, Nazzal Y, Batayneh A, Zumlot T, Zaman H, Elawadi E, et al. Geochemical assessment of ground water contamination with special emphasizes on fluoride, a case study from Midyan Basin, North Western Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci. 2014;71:1495-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2554-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2554-1

Karakochuk CD, Murphy HM, Whitfield KC, Barr SI, Vercauteren SM, Talukder A, et al. Elevated levels of iron in groundwater in Prey Veng province in Cambodia: A possible factor contributing to high iron stores in women. J Water Health. 2015;13(2):575-86. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2014.297 PMid:26042988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2014.297

Huang B, Li Z, Chen Z, Chen G, Zhang C, Huang J, et al. Study and health risk assessment of the occurrence of iron and manganese in groundwater at the terminal of the Xiangjiang River. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(24):19912-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5230-z PMid:26289336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5230-z

Blöcher C, Dorda J, Mavrov V, Chmiel H, Lazaridis NK, Matis KA. Hybrid flotation-membrane filtration process for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Water Res. 2003;37(16):4018-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00314-2 Mid:12909122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00314-2

Srivastava NK, Majumder CB. Novel biofiltration methods for the treatment of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2008;151(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.101 PMid:17997034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.101

Ahluwalia SS, Goyal D. Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(12):2243-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.006 PMid:16427277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.006

Qasim M, Badrelzaman M, Darwish NN, Darwish NA, Hilal N. Reverse osmosis desalination: A state-of-the-art review. Desalination. 2019;459:59-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.008

Anis SF, Hashaikeh R, Hilal N. Reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies and future trends: A comprehensive review. Desalination. 2019;452:159-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.11.006