Comparative Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Immunochromatographic Test Assays with Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for the Diagnosis of COVID-19

Authors

  • Ghada Ismail Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Director of Reference Laboratory of the Egyptian University Hospitals, Egypt
  • Rania Abdel Halim Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Marwa Salah Mostafa Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Dalia H Abdelhamid Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Hossam Abdelghaffar Department of ENT, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Egypt; Secretary General of the Supreme Council for University Hospitals, Egypt
  • Nashwa Naguib Omar Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2607-2518
  • Noha Alaa Eldin Fahim Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-3857

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7076

Keywords:

Coronavirus disease 2019, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, Antibody, Chemiluminescence, Lateral flow immunochromatography

Abstract

Background

To date, the molecular assay is the gold-standard method for COVID-19 diagnosis. However, they are expensive and complex. There is a pressing necessity for developing other effective diagnostics for SARS‐CoV‐2 patients. Therefore, serological detection of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 might provide a good alternative.

Aim

We aimed to compare and evaluate seven rapid diagnostic tests with Mindray chemiluminescent automated immunoassay as a reference method for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detection.

Methods:

This study included the serum of a total of 49 attendees to the Reference Laboratory of Egyptian university hospitals during the period from April 2021 to May 2021. Anti-Covid-19 antibodies detection in serum samples was performed by Mindray fully automated system as our reference method and seven rapid antibody tests; Wondfo, Vazyme, Dynamiker, Panbio, Artron Maccura and Roche.

Results:

The chemiluminescent assay revealed 30 (61.2%) positive samples and 19 (38.8%) negative samples for COVID-19 IgG. For COVID-19 IgM, 11 (22.4%) samples were positive and 38 (77.6%) samples were negative. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were not detected in any of the PCR negative individuals. The best diagnostic performance was demonstrated by Roche IgG and IgM, and Vazyme IgG and IgM antibody tests followed by Panbio. For Roche, the sensitivity and specificity for IgG and IgM were (83.3%, 89.5%) and (72.7%, 81.6%) respectively. Vazyme showed sensitivity and specificity for IgG and IgM were (77.8%, 85.7%) and (75%, 91.7%) respectively. Regards Panbio, the sensitivity and specificity for IgG and IgM were (63.6%, 87.5%) and (50%, 86.7%) respectively. Cohen’s Kappa values revealed a substantial agreement for Roche IgG, Vazyme IgG and IgM of (0.7076, 0.6250, 0.6667) respectively. The worst agreement was reported for Maccura IgG, Wondfo, and Dynamiker IgM with Cohen’s Kappa values of (0.2508, 0.1893, 0.0313) respectively.

Conclusions:

Rapid tests in our study exhibited heterogeneous diagnostic performances. Roche, Vazyme, and Panbio antibody tests showed promising results in concordance with our reference method with the best-reported results. On the other hand, the other tests were inferior and failed in providing valid and reliable results. Further studies are necessary to determine the practicality of these tests in different settings and communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Whitman JD, Hiatt J, Mowery CT, Shy BR, Yu R, Yamamoto TN, et al. Test performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serological assays. MedRxiv. 2020. https://doi:10.1101/2020.04.25.20074856 PMid:32511497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.20074856

Chan JF, Yuan S, Kok KH, To KK, Chu H, Yang J, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):514-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30154-9 PMid:31986261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9

Long QX, Liu BZ, Deng HJ, Wu GC, Deng K, Chen YK, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):845-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41591-020-0897-1

Ismail G, Mostafa MS, Abdelghaffar H, Halim RA, Omar NN, Fahim NAE. Current Status and a Future Perspective of COVID- 19 in Egypt: Egyptian Reference Laboratory Experience. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2021;15(3):1257-65. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.15.3.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.15.3.15

Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:536-44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z

Lijia S, Lihong S, Huabin W, Xiaoping X, Xiaodong L, Yixuan Z, et al. Serological chemiluminescence immunoassay for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(10):e23466. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23466 PMid:32671890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23466

Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

Wang P. Combination of serological total antibody and RT-PCR test for detection of SARS-COV-2 infections. J Virol Methods. 2020;283:113919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113919 PMid:32554043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113919

Sheridan C. Fast, portable tests come online to curb coronavirus pandemic. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(5):515-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41587-020-00010-2 PMid:32203294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41587-020-00010-2

Corman VM, Albarrak AM, Omrani AS, Albarrak MM, Farah ME, Almasri M, et al. Viral shedding and antibody response in 37 patients with middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):477-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ951 PMid:26565003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ951

Racine R, Winslow GM. IgM in microbial infections: Taken for granted? Immunol Lett. 2009;125(2):79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2009.06.003 PMid:19539648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2009.06.003

Liu W, Liu L, Kou G, Zheng Y, Ding Y, Ni W, et al. Evaluation of nucleocapsid and spike protein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(6):e00461-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00461-20 PMid:32229605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00461-20

Infantino M, Grossi V, Lari B, Bambi R, Perri A, Manneschi M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies: An Italian experience. J Med Virol. 2020;92(9):1671-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25932 PMid:32330291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25932

Xu Y, Xiao M, Liu X, Xu S, Du T, Xu J, et al. Significance of serology testing to assist timely diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections: Implication from a family cluster. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):924-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.20201752610 PMid:32286155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1752610

Vashist SK. In vitro diagnostic assays for COVID-19: Recent advances and emerging trends. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(4):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10040202 PMid:32260471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10040202

Findeisen P, Stiegler H, Lopez-Calle E, Schneider T, Urlaub E, Hayer J, et al. Clinical performance evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antibody Test for determining past exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;103:636-41. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.164 PMid:33227517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.164

Borges LP, De Oliveira MGB, de Souza DRV, Dos Santos KA, Heimfarth L, et al. Can the Wondfo® SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibodies be used as a rapid diagnostic test? Arch Biotechnol Biomed. 2020;4:13-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.abb.1001017

Valdivia A, Torres I, Latorre V, Francés-Gómez C, Ferrer J, Forqué L, et al. Suitability of two rapid lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for predicting SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity of sera. J Med Virol. 2021;93(4):2301-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26697 PMid:33236799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26697

Chen SY, Lee YL, Lin YC, Lee NY, Liao CH, Hung YP, et al. Multicenter evaluation of two chemiluminescence and three lateral flow immunoassays for the diagnosis of COVID-19 and assessment of antibody dynamic responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Taiwan. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):2157-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1825016 PMid:32940547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1825016

Plebani M, Parčina M, Bechri I, Zehender G, Terkeš V, Abdel Hafith B, et al. Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test, an immunochromatographic assay for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multicenter European study. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(2):e02240-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02240-20 PMid:33218990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02240-20

Ko JH, Joo EJ, Kim SH, Kim YJ, Huh K, Cho SY, et al. Clinical application of rapid diagnostic test kit for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies into the field of patient care. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021;54(1):97-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.07.003 PMid:32684340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.07.003

Ghaffari A, Meurant R, Ardakani A. COVID-19 serological tests: How well do they actually perform? Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(7):453. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070453 PMid:32635444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070453

Guedez-López GV, Alguacil-Guillén M, González-Donapetry P, Bloise I, Tornero-Marin C, González-García J, et al. Evaluation of three immunochromatographic tests for rapid detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(12):2289-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04010-7 PMid:32808111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04010-7

Younes S, Al-Jighefee H, Shurrab F, Al-Sadeq DW, Younes N, Dargham SR, et al. Diagnostic efficiency of three fully automated serology assays and their correlation with a novel surrogate virus neutralization test in symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-COV-2 individuals. Microorganisms. 2021;9(2):245. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020245 PMid:33504067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020245

Pieri M, Nuccetelli M, Nicolai E, Sarubbi S, Grelli S, Bernardini S. Clinical validation of a second generation anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM automated chemiluminescent immunoassay. J Med Virol. 2021;93(4):2523-28. PMid:33463719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26809

Wakita M, Idei M, Saito K, Horiuchi Y, Yamatani K, Ishikawa S, et al. Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246536. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246536 PMid:33556086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246536

Morshed M, Sekirov I, McLennan M, Levett PN, Chahil N, Mak A, et al. Comparative analysis of capillary vs venous blood for serologic detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by RPOC lateral flow tests. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(3):ofab043. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab043 PMid:33723509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab043

Stein DR, Osiowy C, Gretchen A, Thorlacius L, Fudge D, Lang A, et al. Evaluation of commercial SARS-CoV-2 serological assays in Canadian public health laboratories. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;101(3):115412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115412

Imai K, Tabata S, Ikeda M, Noguchi S, Kitagawa Y, Matuoka M, et al. Clinical evaluation of an immunochromatographic IgM/ IgG antibody assay and chest computed tomography for the diagnosis of COVID-19. J Clin Virol. 2020;128:104393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104393 PMid:32387968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104393

Xie X, Nielsen MC, Muruato AE, Fontes-Garfias CR, Ren P. Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow assay using the plaque reduction neutralization test. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;99(2):115248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115248 PMid:33130510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115248

Fujigaki H, Takemura M, Osawa M, Sakurai A, Nakamoto K, Seto K, et al. Reliability of serological tests for COVID-19: Comparison of three immunochromatography test kits for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Heliyon. 2020;6(9):e04929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04929 PMid:32984615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04929

Haguet H, Douxfils J, Eucher C, Elsen M, Cadrobbi J, Tré- Hardy M, et al. Clinical performance of the Panbio assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG in COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol. 2021;93(5):3277-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26884 PMid:33599299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26884

Paiva KJ, Grisson RD, Chan PA, Huard RC, Caliendo AM, Lonks JR, et al. Validation and performance comparison of three SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. J Med Virol. 2021;93(2):916-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26341 PMid:32710669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26341

Montolio Breva S, Molina Clavero C, Gómez Bertomeu F, Picó- Plana E, Serrat Orús N, Palau Sánchez I, et al. Evaluation of five immunoassays and one lateral flow immunochromatography for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detection. Enferm Infect Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2020.12.002 PMid:33558047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2020.12.002

Lau CS, Hoo SP, Liang YL, Phua SK, Aw TC. Performance of two rapid point of care SARS-COV-2 antibody assays against laboratory-based automated chemiluminescent immunoassays for SARS-COV-2 IG-G, IG-M and total antibodies. Pract Lab Med. 2021;24:e00201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00201 PMid:33501369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00201

La Marca A, Capuzzo M, Paglia T, Roli L, Trenti T, Nelson SM. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): A systematic review and clinical guide to molecular and serological in-vitro diagnostic assays. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(3):483-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.001 PMid:32651106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.001

Swadźba J, Bednarczyk M, Anyszek T, Martin E. A comparison of 7 commercial anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody immunoassays. Arch Med Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.98361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.98361

Mouliou DS, Gourgoulianis KI. False-positive and false-negative COVID-19 cases: Respiratory prevention and management strategies, vaccination, and further perspectives. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021;15(8):993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2021.1917389 PMid:33896332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2021.1917389

Gambino CM, Lo Sasso B, Colomba C, Giglio RV, Agnello L, Bivona G, et al. Comparison of a rapid immunochromatographic test with a chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020;30(3):030901. PMid:33071558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2020.030901

Augustine R, Das S, Hasan A, Abhilash S, Abdul Salam S, Augustine P, et al. Rapid antibody-based COVID-19 mass surveillance: Relevance, challenges, and prospects in a pandemic and post-pandemic world. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10):3372. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103372 PMid:33096742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103372

Jia X, Xiao L, Liu Y. False negative RT-PCR and false positive antibody tests-Concern and solutions in the diagnosis of COVID- 19. J Infect. 2021;82(3):414-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.10.007 PMid:33039501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.10.007

Pegoraro M, Militello V, Salvagno GL, Gaino S, Bassi A, Caloi C, et al. Evaluation of three immunochromatographic tests in COVID-19 serologic diagnosis and their clinical usefulness. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(4):897-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04040-1 PMid:33078222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04040-1

Downloads

Published

2021-09-11

How to Cite

1.
Ismail G, Abdel Halim R, Mostafa MS, H Abdelhamid D, Abdelghaffar H, Omar NN, Fahim NAE. Comparative Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Immunochromatographic Test Assays with Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for the Diagnosis of COVID-19. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 11 [cited 2024 Apr. 24];9(A):802-10. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/7076

Most read articles by the same author(s)