Translation and Validation of the Indonesian Version of the Hypertension Self-care Profile

Arif Setyo Upoyo; Agis Taufik; Akhyarul Anam; Nuriya Nuriya; Saryono Saryono; Ismail Setyopranoto; Heny Suseani Pangastuti

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2021.7119

Authors

Arif Setyo Upoyo Department of Nursing, Health Sciences Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2204-5141
Agis Taufik Department of Nursing, Health Sciences Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Akhyarul Anam Department of Nursing, Health Sciences Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Nuriya Nuriya Department of Nursing, Health Sciences Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Saryono Saryono Department of Nursing, Health Sciences Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Ismail Setyopranoto Department of Neurology, Medicine Public Health and Nursing Faculty, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Heny Suseani Pangastuti Department of Medical and Surgical Nursing, Medicine Public Health and Nursing Faculty, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7119

Keywords:

Hypertension, Self-care, Instrument, Translation, Validation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure self-care profile (HBP-SCP) is one of the instruments that needed to evaluate education program among hypertension patients.

AIM: The purpose of the study was to translate and validate HBP-SCP into Indonesian version.

METHODS: This study involved translation, content validation, and psychometric testing. The first instrument was conducted forward and backward translation by experts. Seven expert reviewed the contents for consistency, clarity, difficulty, representativeness, and suitability for inclusion. Finally, instrument was tested for reliability and validity on 40 hypertensive patients using Cronbach’s alpha and Pearson’s moment product.

RESULTS: The final Indonesian version of HBP-SCP included behavior, motivation, and self-efficacy that each consists of 20 items questions were valid and reliable with positive expert review ratings (content validity index 0.964), internal consistency reliability coefficient ranged from 0.911 to 0.955. Items questionnaire of Indonesian version of HBP-SCP had strong correlation and significant validity (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Indonesian version of HBP-SCP is a valid and reliable instrument to assess behavior, motivation, and self-efficacy among hypertension patients and evaluate group based hypertension education programs in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

World Health Organization. Hypertension. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension. [Last accessed on 2021 Sep 13].

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. The Reports of the Results of Basic Health Research; 2019. Available from: https://www.litbang.kemkes.go.id/laporan-riset-kesehatandasar-riskesdas. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 10].

Peltzer K, Pengpid S. The prevalence and social determinants of hypertension among adults in Indonesia: A crosssectional population-based national survey. Int J Hypertens. 2018;2018:5610725. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5610725 PMid:30174948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5610725

Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, et al. 2020 international society of hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. Hypertension. Hypertension. 2020;75(6):1334-57. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15026 PMid:32370572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026

Saju MD, Allagh KP, Scaria L, Joseph S, Thiyagarajan JA. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension and its associated risk factors: Results from baseline survey of SWADES family cohort study. Int J Hypertens. 2020;2020:4964835. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4964835 PMid:32351729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4964835

Upoyo AS, Setyopranoto I, Pangastuti HS. The modifiable risk factors of uncontrolled hypertension in stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke Res Treat. 2021;2021:6683256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6683256 PMid:33680423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6683256

Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2020;75(2):285-92. PMid:31865786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14240

Upoyo AS, Isworo A, Sari Y, Taufik A, Sumeru A, Anam A. Determinant factors stroke prevention behavior among hypertension patient in Indonesia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9(E):336-9. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6040

Chimberengwa PT, Naidoo M. Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to hypertension among residents of a disadvantaged rural community in Southern Zimbabwe. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0215500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215500 PMid:31237883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215500

Lv X, Niu H, Qu Y, Li M, Li L, Ma X, et al. Awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among hypertensive patients aged 18 to 59 years old in the northeast of China. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34923-5 PMid:30451878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34923-5

Gamage DG, Riddell MA, Joshi R, Thankappan KR, Chow CK, Oldenburg B, et al. Effectiveness of a scalable group-based education and monitoring program, delivered by health workers, to improve control of hypertension in rural India: A cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020;17(1):e1002997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002997 PMid:31895945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002997

Han HR, Lee H, Commodore-Mensah Y, Kim M. Development and validation of the hypertension self-care profile: A practical tool to measure hypertension self-care. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014;29(3):E11-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/jcn.0b013e3182a3fd46 PMid:24088621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e3182a3fd46

DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x PMid:17535316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x

Orem DE. Nursing Concepts of Practice. 6th ed. Mosby: Elsevier; 2001.

Tomey AM, Alligood MR. Nursing Theorists and Their Work. 6th ed. Mosby: Elsevier; 2006. 16. Yaghmai F. Content validity and its estimation. J Med Educ. 2003;3(1):25-7.

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 41 of 2014 Concerning Guidelines for Balanced Nutrition; 2016. Available from: https://www.kesmas.kemkes.go.id/perpu/konten/permenkes/pmk-no.-41-ttg-pedoman-gizi-seimbang. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 10].

Kline RB. Book review: Psychometric theory. J Psychoeduc Assess. 1999;17:275-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299901700307

Sowtali SN, Yusoff DM, Harith S, Mohamed M. Translation and validation of the Malay version of the stroke knowledge test. J Arrhythm. 2016;32(2):112-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2015.10.003 PMid:27092192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2015.10.003