Inter-community Relations Factor on the Empowerment of the Aisle Community in Makassar City: A Structural Equation Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7132Keywords:
Relationship, Empowerment, Healthy aisle, Best modelAbstract
Background: There are several important factors in building community empowerment, one of them is the inter-community relationship. However, further research is rarely done on this dimension. The dimension of the relationship includes community structure, community strength, community motivation, community communication, community integrity, community participation, and community development. Objective: This study aimed to find the best model of the effect of the inter-community relationship on the condition of healthy aisle in Makassar City. Method: This research was conducted in 2 sub-districts in Makassar City, those are Rappocini District and Ujung Tanah District. The research samples involved were 560 households in Lorong. Data analysis was performed using multivariate analysis through the structural equation model (SEM) test. Results: The results of this study found that clear vision (CR = 3.219 and p = 0.01), capacity development (CR = 3.166 and p = 0.02), norms existence (CR = 3.143 and p = 0.02) on inter-community relationship significantly affected the aisle community empowerment. Conclusion: Inter-community relationship is the best model in developing a healthy aisle in Makassar City through solidarity, shared motivation, shared trust, clear vision, resources shares, capacity building, norms in society, government support, and community development. This study recommends that in order to maximize a clear vision for the aisle community working group, the government should carry out legality regarding the aisle community structure.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Surtiani EE. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Terciptanya Kawasan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kawasan Pusat Kota (Studi Kasus: Kawasan Pancuran, Salatiga), Thesis, Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro; 2006.
Adhi ET. Pelayanan sanitasi buruk: Akar dari kemiskinan. J Anal Sos. 2009;14(2):76-87.
Yandri P, Juanda B. Memahami karakter kemiskinan perkotaan dengan pendekatan observasional. J Ekon Stud Pembang. 2018;19(1):75-84. http://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.19.1.4276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.19.1.4276
Ismail M. Corporate social responsibility and its role in community development: An international perspective. J Int Soc Res. 2009;2(9):199-209.
Todd S, Drolet JL. Introduction: Community Practice and Social Development in Social Work. Todd WS, Drolet JL, editors. Dalam Community Practice and Social Development in Social. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 3-16. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6969-8_23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6969-8_23
Fitry IN, Palutturi S, Thaha RM, Syam A. Impact evaluation of healthy city implementation in Makassar city. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020;8:12-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.5175
Palutturi S, Asnawi A. Healthy city awards in South Sulawesi, Indonesia: Expectation and Challenges. J Health Transl Med. 2020;23:163-9.
Palutturi S, Chu C, Moon JY, Nam EW. A comparative study on healthy city capacity mapping: Indonesia and Korea. Soc Sci. 2015;10(6):848-54.
Palutturi S, Saleh LM, Rachmat M, Malek JA. Mapping healthy aisles in Makassar city, Indonesia: Implications for community empowerment. Gac Sanit. 2021;35:S42-5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.12.012 PMid:33832624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.12.012
Widjajanti K. Model pemberdayaan masyarakat. J Ekon Pembang Kaji Masal Ekon Dan Pembang. 2011;12(1):1. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v12i1.202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v12i1.202
Daraba D, Akib H, Saggaf MS, Cahaya A, Salam R. Basic public service partnership model based on gender perspective in Makassar city, Indonesia. J Leg Ethical Regul Issues. 2018;21(4):1-12.
Jamala N, Latief MS, Amin S. Desain Lorong Pada Lingkungan Permukiman Di Kota Makassar. Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin; 2015.
Supriyatno B. The attitude and role of Bekasi City government in slum areas. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2020;30(2):228-42. http://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1676359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1676359
Hamid H. Manajemen Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Makassar: De La Macca; 2011.
Palutturi S. Healthy Cities Implementation in Indonesia: Challenges and Determinants of Successful Partnership Development at Local Government Level. Australia: Thesis, Griffith University; 2013. http://doi.org/10.25904/1912/52
Palutturi S. Healthy Cities: Global Concepts, Local Implementation for Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2018.
Palutturi S, Darmawansyah, Nurhayani. Achievement and typology of partnership in implementation of healthy cities in Indonesia: A case study of Makassar. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2016;14(2):939-49.
Palutturi S, Rutherford S, Davey P, Chu C. Comparison between healthy cities and Adipura in Indonesia. Malays J Med Health Sci. 2013;9(1):35-43.
Sithole T, Mahlangu G, Salek S, Walker S. Evaluating the success of ZaZiBoNa, the Southern African development community collaborative medicines registration initiative. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020;54(6):1319-29. http://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00154-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00154-y
South J, Button D, Quick A, Bagnall AM, Trigwell J, Woodward J, et al. Complexity and community context: Learning from the evaluation design of a national community empowerment programme. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(1):1. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010091 PMid:31877710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010091
Aidillah MR, Palutturi S, Masni, Darmawansyah, Indar, Salmah AU. The impact of effectiveness and participation in good governance on the quality of healthy urban planning in Makassar City, Indonesia. Eur J Biosci. 2020;14(2):6207-11.
Eger C, Miller G, Scarles C. Gender and capacity building: A multilayered study of empowerment. World Dev. 2018;106:207-19. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.024
Cislaghi B, Denny EK, Cissé M, Gueye P, Shrestha B, Shrestha PN, Ferguson G, et al. Changing social norms: The importance of ‘organized diffusion’ for scaling up community health promotion and women empowerment interventions. Prev Sci. 2019;20(6):936-46. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-00998-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-00998-3
Amran AR, Palutturi S, Nurhayani N. Analisis sistem manajemen program lorong sehat di Kota Makassar. Hasanuddin J Public Health. 2020;1(1):22-8. http://doi.org/10.30597/hjph.v1i1.9508
Elliott I, Fejszes V, Tàrrega M. The community empowerment act and localism under devolution in Scotland: The perspective of multiple stakeholders in a council ward. Int J Public Sect Manag. 2019;32(3):302-19. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2018-0080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2018-0080
Kasmel A, Andersen PT. Measurement of community empowerment in three community programs in Rapla (Estonia). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(3):799-817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8030799
Entah AR. Community empowerment and conservation of Adat Nusantara Indonesia. J Law Policy Glob. 2017;68:49-58.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Sukri Palutturi, Lalu Muhammad Saleh, Muhammad Rachmat, Achmad Mawardi Shabir, St. Rosmanely, Muhammad Rafli Aidillah, Jalaluddin Abdul Malek, Eun Woo Nam (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0