Analysis of Complications Development Predictors after Radical Prostatectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7158Keywords:
Lymphocele, Prostatectomy, Prostate cancer, Urethral stricture, Urinary incontinenceAbstract
Introduction: The standard treatment for prostate cancer is radical prostatectomy (RP). This surgical technique results in typical complications such as intraoperative blood loss, urethral strictures (vesicourethral anastomosis), urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, lymphocele, and the ureter or rectum injury. The study aims to analyze the development of complications after radical prostatectomy.
Materials and methods: The article presents a retrospective analysis of clinical cases with an established diagnosis of prostate cancer from 2012 to 2018 in Irkutsk, Russian Federation. During this period, 52 patients met the study criteria. A multivariate analysis established Non-Nerve-sparing RRP (OR-0.9; 95% CI-1.9; -0.07; p=0.035) as a significant incontinence predictor after 2 years.
Results: Multivariate analysis also established previous transurethral operations as a significant predictor of the vesicourethral anastomosis stricture (OR 6.09; 95% CI 0.71; 11.4; p=0.026), which indicates a six times risk of developing a vesicourethral anastomosis stricture if the patient already had one or more transurethral surgery. Obesity (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.03; 0.21; p = 0.008), diabetes (OR 2.3; 95% CI 0.45; 4.2; p = 0.015) and coagulopathy (OR 3.1; 95% CI 0.5; 5.7; p = 0.019) became independent predictors of lymphocele development.
Conclusions: The study revealed some new information on the possible predictors of such complications as urinary incontinence in the late period, the lymphocele, and stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis. Some of the results require further study and confirmation.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Kimura T, Egawa S. Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Asian countries. Int J Urol. 2018;25(6):524-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13593 PMid:29740894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13593
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 PMid:30207593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442 PMid:29313949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442
Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Petrova GV. Malignant Neoplasms in Russia in 2018 (Morbidity and Mortality). FGBU MNIOI Them. Moscow: P. A. Herzen; 2019.
Merabishvili VM. Medium-term prognosis of cancer mortality among the population of Russia. Sib J Oncol. 2019;4(18):5-12. https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2019-18-4-5-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2019-18-4-5-12
Kim EH, Bullock AD. Surgical management for prostate cancer. Mo Med. 2018;115(2):142-5. PMid:30228706
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P. 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1415-24. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1606220 PMid:27626136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220
Pompe RS, Beyer B, Haese A, Preisser F, Michl U, Steuber T. Postoperative complications of contemporary open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using standardized reporting systems. BJU Int. 2018;122(5):801-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14369 PMid:29727912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14369
Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, Ahlering TE, Carroll PR, Graefen M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):382-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047 PMid:22749851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047
Maffezzini M, Seveso M, Taverna G, Giusti G, Benetti A, Graziotti P. Evaluation of complications and results in a contemporary series of 300 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies with the anatomic approach at a single institution. Urol. 2003;61(5):982-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02517-7 PMid:12736020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02517-7
Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderäng U, Thorsteinsdottir T. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: A prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):216-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029 PMid:25770484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029
Fossati N, Willemse PP, van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RC, Yuan CY, Briers E. The benefits and harms of different extents of lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A systematic review. Eur Urol. 2017;72(1):84-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003 PMid:28126351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003
Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A, Haese A, Heidenreich A, Menon M. Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2014;65(1):7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057 PMid:23582879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057
Orberger M, Palisaar J, Roghmann F, Mittelstädt L, Bischoff P, Noldus J. Association between the surgical Apgar score and perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2017;98(1):61-70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000450795 PMid:27907923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000450795
Beck V, Apfelbeck M, Chaloupka M, Kretschmer A, Strittmatter F, Tritschler S. Stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy. Urol A. 2018;57(1):29-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-017-0550-x PMid:29209754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-017-0550-x
Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Willemsen P, de Troyer B, Pieters R, Oosterlinck W. Etiology of urethral stricture disease in the 21st century. J Urol. 2009;182(3):983-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.023 PMid:19616805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.023
Shahrour W, Hodhod A, Kotb A, Prowse O, Elmansy H. Dorsal buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for vesico-urethral anastomotic stricture postradical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2019;130:210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.022 PMid:31039367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.022
Altinova S, Serefoglu EC, Ozdemir AT, Atmaca AF, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD. Factors affecting urethral stricture development after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(4):881-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9519-4 PMid:19165616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9519-4
Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Studer UE. Nerve-sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(1):90-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.013 PMid:17074431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.013
Heers H, Laumeier T, Olbert PJ, Hofmann R, Hegele A. Lymphoceles post-radical retropubic prostatectomy: A retrospective evaluation of epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome. Urol Int. 2015;95(4):400-5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381463 PMid:25871980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000381463
Stolzenburg JU, Kyriazis I, Liatsikos E. Postoperative lymphocele formation after pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy should not be considered an inevitable consequence of the approach. Eur Urol. 2017;71(2):159-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.046 PMid:27595375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.046
Tsaur I, Thomas C. Risk factors, complications, and management of lymphocele formation after radical prostatectomy: A mini-review. Int J Urol. 2019;26(7):711-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13964 PMid:30939628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13964
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Vladimir Vorobev, Vladimir Beloborodov, Vladimir Luchkevich, Dmitriy Shmakov, Olga Baklanova, Stepan Sidorov, Bator Sharakshinov (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
