The Effectiveness of Tele-education for Health Field University Students as a Learning Method during a COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7350Keywords:
Health field students, Tele-education, Pandemic, EffectivenessAbstract
Abstract
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has been affecting many aspects including education globally as many countries closed the school temporally. This study aimed to summarize the effectiveness of the-education application among health-fields university students
Methods
PubMed and EBSCO databases for studies published up to August 2020 were searched. Studies reporting the academic performance or skills performance or students satisfaction were included. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tool.
Result
Published between 2002 and 2020, 22 studies were conducted in developed countries, and 2 studies in developing countries. The tele-education method included e-learning, virtual, and digital learning. When comparing to the control group, of fifteen studies intervention studies measuring academic performance, seven studies showed a higher mean score among the intervention group. For skills performance, there were no studies showing higher skill performance. For studies measuring student satisfaction, one-third showing higher students’ satisfaction among the intervention group compared to the control.
Conclusion
Our finding highlighted the positive effect of various tele-education on academic performance among the health-field university students. Applying the various tele-education in the learning process for health-field university students during the COVID-19 Pandemic is suggested.
Keywords: health field students, tele-education, pandemic, effectiveness
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
UNESCO. COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response, France; 2020.
Varalakshmi R, Swetha R. COVID 2019-role of faculty members to keep mental activeness of students. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102091 PMid:32344332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102091
Loh LC, Ali AM, Ang TH, Chelliah A. Impact of a spreading epidemic on medical students. Malays J Med Sci. 2006;13(2):30-6. PMid:22589602
Curran VR. Tele-education. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(2):57-63. PMid:16539750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/135763306776084400
Ghanem AM, Zaben M, Shaban NA, Green C, Abu-Sitta G, Myers S. Tele-education for teaching of evidence-based medicine and burn care in the occupied Palestinian territory: A pilot study. Lancet. 2012;380:S28-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60208-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60208-1
Campbell JP, Swan R, Jonas K, Ostmo S, Ventura CV, Martinez-Castellanos MA, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a tele-education system for the diagnosis of ophthalmic disease by international trainees. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015;2015:366-75. PMid:26958168
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 PMid:19622552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
JBI. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews; 2017. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2016-002421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002421
Bhatti I, Jones K, Richardson L, Foreman D, Lund J, Tierney G. E-learning vs lecture: Which is the best approach to surgical teaching? Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(4):459-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02173.x PMid:20041922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02173.x
Dolan E, Hancock E, Wareing A. An evaluation of online learning to teach practical competencies in undergraduate health science students. Internet High Educ. 2015;24:21-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.003
Mattheos N, Nattestad A, Attström R. Feasibility of and satisfaction with the use of low-bandwidth videoconferencing for examination of undergraduate students. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(5):278-81. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763303769211292 PMid:14599331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/135763303769211292
Phadtare A, Bahmani A, Shah A, Pietrobon R. Scientific writing: A randomized controlled trial comparing standard and on-line instruction. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-27 PMid:19473511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-27
Raupach T, Muenscher C, Anders S, Steinbach R, Pukrop T, Hege I, et al. Web-based collaborative training of clinical reasoning: A randomized trial. Med Teach. 2009;31(9):e431-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903095502 PMid:19811180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903095502
Solomon DJ, Ferenchick GS, Laird-Fick HS, Kavanaugh K. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708]. BMC Med Educ. 2004;4:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-4-27 PMid:15569389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-4-27
Subramanian A, Timberlake M, Mittakanti H, Lara M, Brandt ML. Novel educational approach for medical students: Improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(2):253-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.12.007 PMid:22365876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.12.007
Abdelaziz M, Kamel SS, Karam O, Abdelrahman A. Evaluation of E-learning program versus traditional lecture instruction for undergraduate nursing students in a faculty of nursing. Teach Learn Nurs. 2011;6(2):50-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2010.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2010.10.003
Attardi SM, Barbeau ML, Rogers KA. Improving online interactions: Lessons from an online anatomy course with a laboratory for undergraduate students. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(6):592-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1776 PMid:29493909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1776
Bello G, Pennisi MA, Maviglia R, Maggiore SM, Bocci MG, Montini L, et al. Online vs live methods for teaching difficult airway management to anesthesiology residents. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(4):547-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2561-0 PMid:15754200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2561-0
Boye S, Moen T, Vik T. An E-learning course in medical immunology: Does it improve learning outcome? Med Teach. 2012;34(9):e649-53. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.675456 PMid:22497322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.675456
Chi CH, Chang I. Realtime telemedicine for teaching a first-aid course. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633021937442 PMid:11809083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633021937442
Cubo E, Doumbe J, López E, Lopez GA, Gatto E, Persi G, et al. Telemedicine enables broader access to movement disorders curricula for medical students. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2017;7:501. https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.347 PMid:29123943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.347
Gossenheimer AN, Bem T, Carneiro ML, de Castro MS. Impact of distance education on academic performance in a pharmaceutical care course. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175117 PMid:28384362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175117
Graber J EDD, APRN, PMHCNS-BC. Comparison of mental health nursing student academic achievement and satisfaction: Classroom versus online education in teaching therapeutic crisis management techniques. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019;40(3):247-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1505985 PMid:30412433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1505985
Hubble MW, Richards ME. Paramedic student performance: Comparison of online with on-campus lecture delivery methods. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(4):261-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00003800 PMid:17076427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00003800
Kidd RS, Stamatakis MK. Comparison of students’ performance in and satisfaction with a clinical pharmacokinetics course delivered live and by interactive videoconferencing. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(1):10. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700110 PMid:17136153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700110
Klibanov OM, Dolder C, Anderson K, Kehr HA, Woods JA. Impact of distance education via interactive videoconferencing on students’ course performance and satisfaction. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018;42(1):21-5. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00113.2016 PMid:29341811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00113.2016
Kukolja-Taradi S, Dogas Z, Dabić M, Perić ID. Scaling-up undergraduate medical education: Enabling virtual mobility by online elective courses. Croat Med J. 2008;49(3):344-51. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2008.3.344 PMid:18581612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2008.3.344
Reese RJ, Aldarondo F, Anderson CR, Lee SJ, Miller TW, Burton D. Telehealth in clinical supervision: A comparison of supervision formats. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(7):356-61. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090401 PMid:19815905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090401
Sichani MM, Mobarakeh SR, Omid A. The effect of distance learning via SMS on academic achievement and satisfaction of medical students. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:29. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_116_16 PMid:29629390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_116_16
Vogt M, Schaffner B, Ribar A, Chavez R. The impact of podcasting on the learning and satisfaction of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010;10(1):38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.03.006 PMid:19781997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.03.006
Aboshady OA, Radwan AE, Eltaweel AR, Azzam A, Aboelnaga AA, Hashem HA, et al. Perception and use of massive open online courses among medical students in a developing country: Multicentre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(1):e006804. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006804 PMid:25564149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006804
Back DA, Haberstroh N, Sostmann K, Schmidmaier G, Putzier M, Perka C, et al. High efficacy and students’ satisfaction after voluntary vs mandatory use of an E-learning program in traumatology and orthopedics-a follow-up study. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(3):353-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.11.007 PMid:24797851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.11.007
Libby LA, Boyd LD, Perry KR, Dominick C. Assessing student satisfaction with face-to-face synchronous distance education in a dental hygiene program. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(3):287-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2017.81.3.tb06273.x PMid:28250034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2017.81.3.tb06273.x
Srinivasan DK. Medical students’ perceptions and an anatomy teacher’s personal experience using an E-learning platform for tutorials during the COVID-19 crisis. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):318-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1970 PMid:32374937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1970
Chipps J, Brysiewicz P, Mars M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of videoconference-based tele-education for medical and nursing education. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012;9(2):78-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00241.x PMid:22409341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00241.x
George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, Wang W, Wark PA, Cotic Z, et al. Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):010406. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.04.010406 PMid:24976965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.04.010406
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Laili Rahayuwati, Iqbal Pramukti, Raini Diah Susanti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
