The Effectiveness of Tele-education for Health Field University Students as a Learning Method during a COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Laili Rahayuwati Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia
  • Iqbal Pramukti Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia
  • Raini Diah Susanti Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7350

Keywords:

Health field students, Tele-education, Pandemic, Effectiveness

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has been affecting many aspects including education globally as many countries closed the school temporally. This study aimed to summarize the effectiveness of the-education application among health-fields university students

Methods

PubMed and EBSCO databases for studies published up to August 2020 were searched. Studies reporting the academic performance or skills performance or students satisfaction were included. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tool.

Result

Published between 2002 and 2020, 22 studies were conducted in developed countries, and 2 studies in developing countries. The tele-education method included e-learning, virtual, and digital learning. When comparing to the control group, of fifteen studies intervention studies measuring academic performance, seven studies showed a higher mean score among the intervention group. For skills performance, there were no studies showing higher skill performance. For studies measuring student satisfaction, one-third showing higher students’ satisfaction among the intervention group compared to the control.

Conclusion

Our finding highlighted the positive effect of various tele-education on academic performance among the health-field university students. Applying the various tele-education in the learning process for health-field university students during the COVID-19 Pandemic is suggested.

Keywords: health field students, tele-education, pandemic, effectiveness

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

UNESCO. COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response, France; 2020.

Varalakshmi R, Swetha R. COVID 2019-role of faculty members to keep mental activeness of students. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102091 PMid:32344332

Loh LC, Ali AM, Ang TH, Chelliah A. Impact of a spreading epidemic on medical students. Malays J Med Sci. 2006;13(2):30-6. PMid:22589602

Curran VR. Tele-education. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(2):57-63. PMid:16539750

Ghanem AM, Zaben M, Shaban NA, Green C, Abu-Sitta G, Myers S. Tele-education for teaching of evidence-based medicine and burn care in the occupied Palestinian territory: A pilot study. Lancet. 2012;380:S28-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60208-1

Campbell JP, Swan R, Jonas K, Ostmo S, Ventura CV, Martinez-Castellanos MA, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a tele-education system for the diagnosis of ophthalmic disease by international trainees. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015;2015:366-75. PMid:26958168

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 PMid:19622552

JBI. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews; 2017. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2016-002421

Bhatti I, Jones K, Richardson L, Foreman D, Lund J, Tierney G. E-learning vs lecture: Which is the best approach to surgical teaching? Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(4):459-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02173.x PMid:20041922

Dolan E, Hancock E, Wareing A. An evaluation of online learning to teach practical competencies in undergraduate health science students. Internet High Educ. 2015;24:21-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.003

Mattheos N, Nattestad A, Attström R. Feasibility of and satisfaction with the use of low-bandwidth videoconferencing for examination of undergraduate students. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(5):278-81. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763303769211292 PMid:14599331

Phadtare A, Bahmani A, Shah A, Pietrobon R. Scientific writing: A randomized controlled trial comparing standard and on-line instruction. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-27 PMid:19473511

Raupach T, Muenscher C, Anders S, Steinbach R, Pukrop T, Hege I, et al. Web-based collaborative training of clinical reasoning: A randomized trial. Med Teach. 2009;31(9):e431-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903095502 PMid:19811180

Solomon DJ, Ferenchick GS, Laird-Fick HS, Kavanaugh K. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708]. BMC Med Educ. 2004;4:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-4-27 PMid:15569389

Subramanian A, Timberlake M, Mittakanti H, Lara M, Brandt ML. Novel educational approach for medical students: Improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(2):253-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.12.007 PMid:22365876

Abdelaziz M, Kamel SS, Karam O, Abdelrahman A. Evaluation of E-learning program versus traditional lecture instruction for undergraduate nursing students in a faculty of nursing. Teach Learn Nurs. 2011;6(2):50-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2010.10.003

Attardi SM, Barbeau ML, Rogers KA. Improving online interactions: Lessons from an online anatomy course with a laboratory for undergraduate students. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(6):592-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1776 PMid:29493909

Bello G, Pennisi MA, Maviglia R, Maggiore SM, Bocci MG, Montini L, et al. Online vs live methods for teaching difficult airway management to anesthesiology residents. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(4):547-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2561-0 PMid:15754200

Boye S, Moen T, Vik T. An E-learning course in medical immunology: Does it improve learning outcome? Med Teach. 2012;34(9):e649-53. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.675456 PMid:22497322

Chi CH, Chang I. Realtime telemedicine for teaching a first-aid course. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633021937442 PMid:11809083

Cubo E, Doumbe J, López E, Lopez GA, Gatto E, Persi G, et al. Telemedicine enables broader access to movement disorders curricula for medical students. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2017;7:501. https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.347 PMid:29123943

Gossenheimer AN, Bem T, Carneiro ML, de Castro MS. Impact of distance education on academic performance in a pharmaceutical care course. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175117 PMid:28384362

Graber J EDD, APRN, PMHCNS-BC. Comparison of mental health nursing student academic achievement and satisfaction: Classroom versus online education in teaching therapeutic crisis management techniques. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019;40(3):247-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1505985 PMid:30412433

Hubble MW, Richards ME. Paramedic student performance: Comparison of online with on-campus lecture delivery methods. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(4):261-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00003800 PMid:17076427

Kidd RS, Stamatakis MK. Comparison of students’ performance in and satisfaction with a clinical pharmacokinetics course delivered live and by interactive videoconferencing. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(1):10. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700110 PMid:17136153

Klibanov OM, Dolder C, Anderson K, Kehr HA, Woods JA. Impact of distance education via interactive videoconferencing on students’ course performance and satisfaction. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018;42(1):21-5. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00113.2016 PMid:29341811

Kukolja-Taradi S, Dogas Z, Dabić M, Perić ID. Scaling-up undergraduate medical education: Enabling virtual mobility by online elective courses. Croat Med J. 2008;49(3):344-51. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2008.3.344 PMid:18581612

Reese RJ, Aldarondo F, Anderson CR, Lee SJ, Miller TW, Burton D. Telehealth in clinical supervision: A comparison of supervision formats. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(7):356-61. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090401 PMid:19815905

Sichani MM, Mobarakeh SR, Omid A. The effect of distance learning via SMS on academic achievement and satisfaction of medical students. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:29. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_116_16 PMid:29629390

Vogt M, Schaffner B, Ribar A, Chavez R. The impact of podcasting on the learning and satisfaction of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010;10(1):38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.03.006 PMid:19781997

Aboshady OA, Radwan AE, Eltaweel AR, Azzam A, Aboelnaga AA, Hashem HA, et al. Perception and use of massive open online courses among medical students in a developing country: Multicentre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(1):e006804. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006804 PMid:25564149

Back DA, Haberstroh N, Sostmann K, Schmidmaier G, Putzier M, Perka C, et al. High efficacy and students’ satisfaction after voluntary vs mandatory use of an E-learning program in traumatology and orthopedics-a follow-up study. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(3):353-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.11.007 PMid:24797851

Libby LA, Boyd LD, Perry KR, Dominick C. Assessing student satisfaction with face-to-face synchronous distance education in a dental hygiene program. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(3):287-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2017.81.3.tb06273.x PMid:28250034

Srinivasan DK. Medical students’ perceptions and an anatomy teacher’s personal experience using an E-learning platform for tutorials during the COVID-19 crisis. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):318-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1970 PMid:32374937

Chipps J, Brysiewicz P, Mars M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of videoconference-based tele-education for medical and nursing education. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012;9(2):78-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00241.x PMid:22409341

George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, Wang W, Wark PA, Cotic Z, et al. Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):010406. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.04.010406 PMid:24976965

Downloads

Published

2021-11-10

How to Cite

1.
Rahayuwati L, Pramukti I, Susanti RD. The Effectiveness of Tele-education for Health Field University Students as a Learning Method during a COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Nov. 10 [cited 2022 May 27];9(T6):159-63. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/7350

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>