Lung Ultrasound versus Pulmonary Auscultation in Detecting Pulmonary Congestion in the Critically Ill

Authors

  • Abdou Ibrahim Department of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4923-3780
  • Hesham Mohamed Elbeny Department of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Randa Soliman Department of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Soliman Belal Department of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7614

Keywords:

Pulmonary edema, Lung ultrasound, Chest auscultation, Lung ultrasound score

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients, auscultation might be challenging as dorsal lung fields are difficult to reach in supine-positioned patients, and the environment is often noisy. In recent years, clinicians have started to consider lung ultrasound (LUS) as a useful diagnostic tool for a variety of pulmonary pathologies, including pulmonary edema.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare LUS versus pulmonary auscultation for detecting pulmonary edema in critically ill patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients were included in this study, all included patients underwent clinical examination, chest auscultation of anterior and lateral (axillary) chest wall and back in each hemithorax in supine position was done, followed by LUS using Bedside LUS in Emergency (BLUE) protocol. LUS score was recorded; abnormal auscultation was defined as the presence of rales or wheezes. Laboratory tests were done on admission such as pro-BNP, renal function, and blood gases. Pro-BNP was used as diagnostic tool for volume overload and was correlated with LUS and stethoscope for detecting pulmonary edema. Pneumonia was excluded with normal total leukocyte counts, C-reactive protein, and absence of fever.

RESULTS: This study included 61 patients with diagnosis of pulmonary edema, all data were recorded on admission and showed that there was statistically significant good positive correlation between LUS and Pro-BNP (p < 0.05), and Pearson correlation between LUS and Pro-BNP among the studied patients is statistically significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). Furthermore, we found that both LUS and Pro-BNP were statistically significant higher among patients with rales (p < 0.05) only 36 (59%) patients were positive as pulmonary edema with pulmonary auscultation (presence of rales) and 25 (41%) patients were negative for pulmonary edema (NO RALES) while they were positive for pulmonary edema with LUS (high LUS score)and pro-BNP.

CONCLUSION: Pulmonary auscultation has poor sensitivity for pulmonary congestion while LUS had statistically significant higher sensitivity for pulmonary edema.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Gheorghiade M, Follath F, Ponikowski P, Barsuk JH, Blair JE, Cleland JG, et al. Assessing and grading congestion in acute heart failure: A scientific statement from the acute heart failure committee of the heart failure association of the European society of cardiology and endorsed by the European society of intensive care medicine. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(5):423-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq045 PMid:20354029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq045

Picano E, Pellikka PA. Ultrasound of extravascular lung water: A new standard for pulmonary congestion. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2097-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw164

Platz E, Lewis EF, Uno H, Peck J, Pivetta E, Merz AA, et al. Detection and prognostic value of pulmonary congestion by lung ultrasound in ambulatory heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(15):1244-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv745 PMid:26819225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv745

Li H, Li YD, Zhu WW, Kong LY, Ye XG, Cai QZ, et al. A simplified ultrasound comet tail grading scoring to assess pulmonary congestion in patients with heart failure. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8474839. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8474839 PMid:29487872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8474839

Xirouchaki N, Magkanas E, Vaporidi K, Kondili E, Plataki M, Patrianakos A, et al. Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: comparison with bedside chest radiography. Int Care Med. 2011;37(9):1488-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2317-y PMid:21809107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2317-y

Martindale JL, Wakai A, Collins SP, Levy PD, Diercks D, Hiestand BC, et al. Diagnosing acute heart failure in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(3):223-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12878 PMid:26910112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12878

Martelius L, Heldt H, Lauerma K. B-lines on pediatric lung sonography: Comparison with computed tomography. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(1):153-7. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.01092 PMid:26657749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.01092

Torino C, Gargani L, Sicari R, Letachowicz K, Ekart R, Fliser D, et al. The agreement between auscultation and lung ultrasound in hemodialysis patients: The LUST study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:2005-11. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03890416 PMid:27660305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03890416

Cox EG, Koster G, Baron A, Kaufmann T, Eck RJ, Veenstra TC, et al. Should the ultrasound probe replace your stethoscope? A SICS-I sub-study comparing lung ultrasound and pulmonary auscultation in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2020;24:14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2719-8

Pivetta E, Goffi A, Nazerian P, Castagno D, Tozzetti C, Tizzani P, et al. Lung ultrasound integrated with clinical assessment for the diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(6):754-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1379 PMid:30690825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1379

Hansell L, Milross M, Delaney A, Tian DH. George Ntoumenopoulos, Lung ultrasound has greater accuracy than conventional respiratory assessment tools for the diagnosis of pleural effusion, lung consolidation and collapse: A systematic review. J Physiother. 2021;67(1):41-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2020.12.002 PMid:33353830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2020.12.002

Downloads

Published

2021-11-18

How to Cite

1.
Ibrahim A, Elbeny HM, Soliman R, Belal S. Lung Ultrasound versus Pulmonary Auscultation in Detecting Pulmonary Congestion in the Critically Ill. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Nov. 18 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];9(B):1544-8. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/7614

Funding data